Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of canal transportation, centering ability, and remaining dentin thickness between WaveOne and ProTaper rotary by using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study

AIMS: To compare the canal transportation, centering ability, and remaining dentin thickness of WaveOne and ProTaper systems using cone beam computed tomography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty extracted human single-rooted premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scanning of all tee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jain, Aditi, Asrani, Hemant, Singhal, Abhinav Chand, Bhatia, Taranjeet Kaur, Sharma, Vaibhav, Jaiswal, Pragya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5026104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27656063
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.190024
_version_ 1782454080639074304
author Jain, Aditi
Asrani, Hemant
Singhal, Abhinav Chand
Bhatia, Taranjeet Kaur
Sharma, Vaibhav
Jaiswal, Pragya
author_facet Jain, Aditi
Asrani, Hemant
Singhal, Abhinav Chand
Bhatia, Taranjeet Kaur
Sharma, Vaibhav
Jaiswal, Pragya
author_sort Jain, Aditi
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To compare the canal transportation, centering ability, and remaining dentin thickness of WaveOne and ProTaper systems using cone beam computed tomography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty extracted human single-rooted premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scanning of all teeth was taken; canal curvatures were calculated, and the samples were randomly divided into two groups, with twenty samples in each group; one group was instrumented with WaveOne system and the other group with ProTaper rotary system. Postinstrumentation scans were performed, and the two scans were compared to determine canal transportation, centering ability, and remaining dentin thickness at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm from the root apex. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Student's unpaired t-test. RESULTS: Using Student's unpaired t-test, results were as follows: for canal transportation, Group 1 showed significant difference at 3 mm and 6 mm and insignificant difference at 9 mm while Group 2 showed insignificant difference in all the three regions. For centering ability and remaining dentin thickness, Group 1 showed insignificant difference at 3 mm and 9 mm while significant difference at 6 mm was obtained. When comparison of remaining dentin thickness was done at three levels using two groups WaveOne and ProTaper, there was no significant difference between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: (1) WaveOne single reciprocation file system respected better canal anatomy better than ProTaper. (2) Individually, centering ability of WaveOne was better at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm levels. (3) However, ProTaper individually was better centered at 3 mm (apical third) and 9 mm (coronal 3(rd)) levels than 6 mm level (middle third).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5026104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50261042016-09-21 Comparative evaluation of canal transportation, centering ability, and remaining dentin thickness between WaveOne and ProTaper rotary by using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study Jain, Aditi Asrani, Hemant Singhal, Abhinav Chand Bhatia, Taranjeet Kaur Sharma, Vaibhav Jaiswal, Pragya J Conserv Dent Original Research Article AIMS: To compare the canal transportation, centering ability, and remaining dentin thickness of WaveOne and ProTaper systems using cone beam computed tomography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty extracted human single-rooted premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scanning of all teeth was taken; canal curvatures were calculated, and the samples were randomly divided into two groups, with twenty samples in each group; one group was instrumented with WaveOne system and the other group with ProTaper rotary system. Postinstrumentation scans were performed, and the two scans were compared to determine canal transportation, centering ability, and remaining dentin thickness at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm from the root apex. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Student's unpaired t-test. RESULTS: Using Student's unpaired t-test, results were as follows: for canal transportation, Group 1 showed significant difference at 3 mm and 6 mm and insignificant difference at 9 mm while Group 2 showed insignificant difference in all the three regions. For centering ability and remaining dentin thickness, Group 1 showed insignificant difference at 3 mm and 9 mm while significant difference at 6 mm was obtained. When comparison of remaining dentin thickness was done at three levels using two groups WaveOne and ProTaper, there was no significant difference between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: (1) WaveOne single reciprocation file system respected better canal anatomy better than ProTaper. (2) Individually, centering ability of WaveOne was better at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm levels. (3) However, ProTaper individually was better centered at 3 mm (apical third) and 9 mm (coronal 3(rd)) levels than 6 mm level (middle third). Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5026104/ /pubmed/27656063 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.190024 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Jain, Aditi
Asrani, Hemant
Singhal, Abhinav Chand
Bhatia, Taranjeet Kaur
Sharma, Vaibhav
Jaiswal, Pragya
Comparative evaluation of canal transportation, centering ability, and remaining dentin thickness between WaveOne and ProTaper rotary by using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study
title Comparative evaluation of canal transportation, centering ability, and remaining dentin thickness between WaveOne and ProTaper rotary by using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study
title_full Comparative evaluation of canal transportation, centering ability, and remaining dentin thickness between WaveOne and ProTaper rotary by using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of canal transportation, centering ability, and remaining dentin thickness between WaveOne and ProTaper rotary by using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of canal transportation, centering ability, and remaining dentin thickness between WaveOne and ProTaper rotary by using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study
title_short Comparative evaluation of canal transportation, centering ability, and remaining dentin thickness between WaveOne and ProTaper rotary by using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of canal transportation, centering ability, and remaining dentin thickness between waveone and protaper rotary by using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5026104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27656063
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.190024
work_keys_str_mv AT jainaditi comparativeevaluationofcanaltransportationcenteringabilityandremainingdentinthicknessbetweenwaveoneandprotaperrotarybyusingconebeamcomputedtomographyaninvitrostudy
AT asranihemant comparativeevaluationofcanaltransportationcenteringabilityandremainingdentinthicknessbetweenwaveoneandprotaperrotarybyusingconebeamcomputedtomographyaninvitrostudy
AT singhalabhinavchand comparativeevaluationofcanaltransportationcenteringabilityandremainingdentinthicknessbetweenwaveoneandprotaperrotarybyusingconebeamcomputedtomographyaninvitrostudy
AT bhatiataranjeetkaur comparativeevaluationofcanaltransportationcenteringabilityandremainingdentinthicknessbetweenwaveoneandprotaperrotarybyusingconebeamcomputedtomographyaninvitrostudy
AT sharmavaibhav comparativeevaluationofcanaltransportationcenteringabilityandremainingdentinthicknessbetweenwaveoneandprotaperrotarybyusingconebeamcomputedtomographyaninvitrostudy
AT jaiswalpragya comparativeevaluationofcanaltransportationcenteringabilityandremainingdentinthicknessbetweenwaveoneandprotaperrotarybyusingconebeamcomputedtomographyaninvitrostudy