Cargando…

Porcine lie detectors: Automatic quantification of posture state and transitions in sows using inertial sensors

This paper presents a novel approach to automated classification and quantification of sow postures and posture transitions that may enable large scale and accurate continuous behaviour assessment on farm. Automatic classification and quantification of postures and posture transitions in domestic an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thompson, Robin, Matheson, Stephanie M., Plötz, Thomas, Edwards, Sandra A., Kyriazakis, Ilias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5026400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27667883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.07.017
_version_ 1782454122198335488
author Thompson, Robin
Matheson, Stephanie M.
Plötz, Thomas
Edwards, Sandra A.
Kyriazakis, Ilias
author_facet Thompson, Robin
Matheson, Stephanie M.
Plötz, Thomas
Edwards, Sandra A.
Kyriazakis, Ilias
author_sort Thompson, Robin
collection PubMed
description This paper presents a novel approach to automated classification and quantification of sow postures and posture transitions that may enable large scale and accurate continuous behaviour assessment on farm. Automatic classification and quantification of postures and posture transitions in domestic animals has substantial potential to enhance their welfare and productivity. Analysis of such behaviours in farrowing sows can highlight the need for human intervention or lead to the prediction of movement patterns that are potentially dangerous for their piglets, such as crushing when the sow lies down. Data were recorded by a tri-axial accelerometer secured to the hind-end of each sow, in a deployment that involved six sows over the period around parturition. The posture state (standing, sitting, lateral and sternal lying) was automatically classified for the full dataset with a mean F(1) score (a measure of predictive performance between 0 and 1) of 0.78. Sitting was shown to present a greater challenge to classification with a F(1) score of 0.54, compared to the lateral lying postures, which were classified with an average F(1) score of 0.91. Posture transitions were detected with a F(1) score of 0.79. We automatically extracted and visualized a range of features that characterise the manner in which the sows changed posture in order to provide comparative descriptors of sow activity and lying style that can be used to assess the influence of genetics or housing design. The methodology presented in this paper can be applied in large scale deployments with potential for enhancing animal welfare and productivity on farm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5026400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50264002016-09-23 Porcine lie detectors: Automatic quantification of posture state and transitions in sows using inertial sensors Thompson, Robin Matheson, Stephanie M. Plötz, Thomas Edwards, Sandra A. Kyriazakis, Ilias Comput Electron Agric Original Papers This paper presents a novel approach to automated classification and quantification of sow postures and posture transitions that may enable large scale and accurate continuous behaviour assessment on farm. Automatic classification and quantification of postures and posture transitions in domestic animals has substantial potential to enhance their welfare and productivity. Analysis of such behaviours in farrowing sows can highlight the need for human intervention or lead to the prediction of movement patterns that are potentially dangerous for their piglets, such as crushing when the sow lies down. Data were recorded by a tri-axial accelerometer secured to the hind-end of each sow, in a deployment that involved six sows over the period around parturition. The posture state (standing, sitting, lateral and sternal lying) was automatically classified for the full dataset with a mean F(1) score (a measure of predictive performance between 0 and 1) of 0.78. Sitting was shown to present a greater challenge to classification with a F(1) score of 0.54, compared to the lateral lying postures, which were classified with an average F(1) score of 0.91. Posture transitions were detected with a F(1) score of 0.79. We automatically extracted and visualized a range of features that characterise the manner in which the sows changed posture in order to provide comparative descriptors of sow activity and lying style that can be used to assess the influence of genetics or housing design. The methodology presented in this paper can be applied in large scale deployments with potential for enhancing animal welfare and productivity on farm. Elsevier 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5026400/ /pubmed/27667883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.07.017 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Papers
Thompson, Robin
Matheson, Stephanie M.
Plötz, Thomas
Edwards, Sandra A.
Kyriazakis, Ilias
Porcine lie detectors: Automatic quantification of posture state and transitions in sows using inertial sensors
title Porcine lie detectors: Automatic quantification of posture state and transitions in sows using inertial sensors
title_full Porcine lie detectors: Automatic quantification of posture state and transitions in sows using inertial sensors
title_fullStr Porcine lie detectors: Automatic quantification of posture state and transitions in sows using inertial sensors
title_full_unstemmed Porcine lie detectors: Automatic quantification of posture state and transitions in sows using inertial sensors
title_short Porcine lie detectors: Automatic quantification of posture state and transitions in sows using inertial sensors
title_sort porcine lie detectors: automatic quantification of posture state and transitions in sows using inertial sensors
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5026400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27667883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.07.017
work_keys_str_mv AT thompsonrobin porcineliedetectorsautomaticquantificationofposturestateandtransitionsinsowsusinginertialsensors
AT mathesonstephaniem porcineliedetectorsautomaticquantificationofposturestateandtransitionsinsowsusinginertialsensors
AT plotzthomas porcineliedetectorsautomaticquantificationofposturestateandtransitionsinsowsusinginertialsensors
AT edwardssandraa porcineliedetectorsautomaticquantificationofposturestateandtransitionsinsowsusinginertialsensors
AT kyriazakisilias porcineliedetectorsautomaticquantificationofposturestateandtransitionsinsowsusinginertialsensors