Cargando…

Development and Validation of a Simple Risk Score for Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes in a Resource-Constrained Setting

Objective. To develop and validate a risk score for detecting cases of undiagnosed diabetes in a resource-constrained country. Methods. Two population-based studies in Peruvian population aged ≥35 years were used in the analysis: the ENINBSC survey (n = 2,472) and the CRONICAS Cohort Study (n = 2,94...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernabe-Ortiz, Antonio, Smeeth, Liam, Gilman, Robert H., Sanchez-Abanto, Jose R., Checkley, William, Miranda, J. Jaime, Study Group, CRONICAS Cohort
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5027039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27689096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8790235
_version_ 1782454173449584640
author Bernabe-Ortiz, Antonio
Smeeth, Liam
Gilman, Robert H.
Sanchez-Abanto, Jose R.
Checkley, William
Miranda, J. Jaime
Study Group, CRONICAS Cohort
author_facet Bernabe-Ortiz, Antonio
Smeeth, Liam
Gilman, Robert H.
Sanchez-Abanto, Jose R.
Checkley, William
Miranda, J. Jaime
Study Group, CRONICAS Cohort
author_sort Bernabe-Ortiz, Antonio
collection PubMed
description Objective. To develop and validate a risk score for detecting cases of undiagnosed diabetes in a resource-constrained country. Methods. Two population-based studies in Peruvian population aged ≥35 years were used in the analysis: the ENINBSC survey (n = 2,472) and the CRONICAS Cohort Study (n = 2,945). Fasting plasma glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L was used to diagnose diabetes in both studies. Coefficients for risk score were derived from the ENINBSC data and then the performance was validated using both baseline and follow-up data of the CRONICAS Cohort Study. Results. The prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes was 2.0% in the ENINBSC survey and 2.9% in the CRONICAS Cohort Study. Predictors of undiagnosed diabetes were age, diabetes in first-degree relatives, and waist circumference. Score values ranged from 0 to 4, with an optimal cutoff ≥2 and had a moderate performance when applied in the CRONICAS baseline data (AUC = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.62–0.73; sensitivity 70%; specificity 59%). When predicting incident cases, the AUC was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.61–0.71), with a sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 59%. Conclusions. A simple nonblood based risk score based on age, diabetes in first-degree relatives, and waist circumference can be used as a simple screening tool for undiagnosed and incident cases of diabetes in Peru.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5027039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50270392016-09-29 Development and Validation of a Simple Risk Score for Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes in a Resource-Constrained Setting Bernabe-Ortiz, Antonio Smeeth, Liam Gilman, Robert H. Sanchez-Abanto, Jose R. Checkley, William Miranda, J. Jaime Study Group, CRONICAS Cohort J Diabetes Res Research Article Objective. To develop and validate a risk score for detecting cases of undiagnosed diabetes in a resource-constrained country. Methods. Two population-based studies in Peruvian population aged ≥35 years were used in the analysis: the ENINBSC survey (n = 2,472) and the CRONICAS Cohort Study (n = 2,945). Fasting plasma glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L was used to diagnose diabetes in both studies. Coefficients for risk score were derived from the ENINBSC data and then the performance was validated using both baseline and follow-up data of the CRONICAS Cohort Study. Results. The prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes was 2.0% in the ENINBSC survey and 2.9% in the CRONICAS Cohort Study. Predictors of undiagnosed diabetes were age, diabetes in first-degree relatives, and waist circumference. Score values ranged from 0 to 4, with an optimal cutoff ≥2 and had a moderate performance when applied in the CRONICAS baseline data (AUC = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.62–0.73; sensitivity 70%; specificity 59%). When predicting incident cases, the AUC was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.61–0.71), with a sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 59%. Conclusions. A simple nonblood based risk score based on age, diabetes in first-degree relatives, and waist circumference can be used as a simple screening tool for undiagnosed and incident cases of diabetes in Peru. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5027039/ /pubmed/27689096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8790235 Text en Copyright © 2016 Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bernabe-Ortiz, Antonio
Smeeth, Liam
Gilman, Robert H.
Sanchez-Abanto, Jose R.
Checkley, William
Miranda, J. Jaime
Study Group, CRONICAS Cohort
Development and Validation of a Simple Risk Score for Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes in a Resource-Constrained Setting
title Development and Validation of a Simple Risk Score for Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes in a Resource-Constrained Setting
title_full Development and Validation of a Simple Risk Score for Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes in a Resource-Constrained Setting
title_fullStr Development and Validation of a Simple Risk Score for Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes in a Resource-Constrained Setting
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of a Simple Risk Score for Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes in a Resource-Constrained Setting
title_short Development and Validation of a Simple Risk Score for Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes in a Resource-Constrained Setting
title_sort development and validation of a simple risk score for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in a resource-constrained setting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5027039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27689096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8790235
work_keys_str_mv AT bernabeortizantonio developmentandvalidationofasimpleriskscoreforundiagnosedtype2diabetesinaresourceconstrainedsetting
AT smeethliam developmentandvalidationofasimpleriskscoreforundiagnosedtype2diabetesinaresourceconstrainedsetting
AT gilmanroberth developmentandvalidationofasimpleriskscoreforundiagnosedtype2diabetesinaresourceconstrainedsetting
AT sanchezabantojoser developmentandvalidationofasimpleriskscoreforundiagnosedtype2diabetesinaresourceconstrainedsetting
AT checkleywilliam developmentandvalidationofasimpleriskscoreforundiagnosedtype2diabetesinaresourceconstrainedsetting
AT mirandajjaime developmentandvalidationofasimpleriskscoreforundiagnosedtype2diabetesinaresourceconstrainedsetting
AT studygroupcronicascohort developmentandvalidationofasimpleriskscoreforundiagnosedtype2diabetesinaresourceconstrainedsetting