Cargando…
Development and Validation of a Simple Risk Score for Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes in a Resource-Constrained Setting
Objective. To develop and validate a risk score for detecting cases of undiagnosed diabetes in a resource-constrained country. Methods. Two population-based studies in Peruvian population aged ≥35 years were used in the analysis: the ENINBSC survey (n = 2,472) and the CRONICAS Cohort Study (n = 2,94...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5027039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27689096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8790235 |
_version_ | 1782454173449584640 |
---|---|
author | Bernabe-Ortiz, Antonio Smeeth, Liam Gilman, Robert H. Sanchez-Abanto, Jose R. Checkley, William Miranda, J. Jaime Study Group, CRONICAS Cohort |
author_facet | Bernabe-Ortiz, Antonio Smeeth, Liam Gilman, Robert H. Sanchez-Abanto, Jose R. Checkley, William Miranda, J. Jaime Study Group, CRONICAS Cohort |
author_sort | Bernabe-Ortiz, Antonio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective. To develop and validate a risk score for detecting cases of undiagnosed diabetes in a resource-constrained country. Methods. Two population-based studies in Peruvian population aged ≥35 years were used in the analysis: the ENINBSC survey (n = 2,472) and the CRONICAS Cohort Study (n = 2,945). Fasting plasma glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L was used to diagnose diabetes in both studies. Coefficients for risk score were derived from the ENINBSC data and then the performance was validated using both baseline and follow-up data of the CRONICAS Cohort Study. Results. The prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes was 2.0% in the ENINBSC survey and 2.9% in the CRONICAS Cohort Study. Predictors of undiagnosed diabetes were age, diabetes in first-degree relatives, and waist circumference. Score values ranged from 0 to 4, with an optimal cutoff ≥2 and had a moderate performance when applied in the CRONICAS baseline data (AUC = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.62–0.73; sensitivity 70%; specificity 59%). When predicting incident cases, the AUC was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.61–0.71), with a sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 59%. Conclusions. A simple nonblood based risk score based on age, diabetes in first-degree relatives, and waist circumference can be used as a simple screening tool for undiagnosed and incident cases of diabetes in Peru. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5027039 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50270392016-09-29 Development and Validation of a Simple Risk Score for Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes in a Resource-Constrained Setting Bernabe-Ortiz, Antonio Smeeth, Liam Gilman, Robert H. Sanchez-Abanto, Jose R. Checkley, William Miranda, J. Jaime Study Group, CRONICAS Cohort J Diabetes Res Research Article Objective. To develop and validate a risk score for detecting cases of undiagnosed diabetes in a resource-constrained country. Methods. Two population-based studies in Peruvian population aged ≥35 years were used in the analysis: the ENINBSC survey (n = 2,472) and the CRONICAS Cohort Study (n = 2,945). Fasting plasma glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L was used to diagnose diabetes in both studies. Coefficients for risk score were derived from the ENINBSC data and then the performance was validated using both baseline and follow-up data of the CRONICAS Cohort Study. Results. The prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes was 2.0% in the ENINBSC survey and 2.9% in the CRONICAS Cohort Study. Predictors of undiagnosed diabetes were age, diabetes in first-degree relatives, and waist circumference. Score values ranged from 0 to 4, with an optimal cutoff ≥2 and had a moderate performance when applied in the CRONICAS baseline data (AUC = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.62–0.73; sensitivity 70%; specificity 59%). When predicting incident cases, the AUC was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.61–0.71), with a sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 59%. Conclusions. A simple nonblood based risk score based on age, diabetes in first-degree relatives, and waist circumference can be used as a simple screening tool for undiagnosed and incident cases of diabetes in Peru. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5027039/ /pubmed/27689096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8790235 Text en Copyright © 2016 Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bernabe-Ortiz, Antonio Smeeth, Liam Gilman, Robert H. Sanchez-Abanto, Jose R. Checkley, William Miranda, J. Jaime Study Group, CRONICAS Cohort Development and Validation of a Simple Risk Score for Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes in a Resource-Constrained Setting |
title | Development and Validation of a Simple Risk Score for Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes in a Resource-Constrained Setting |
title_full | Development and Validation of a Simple Risk Score for Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes in a Resource-Constrained Setting |
title_fullStr | Development and Validation of a Simple Risk Score for Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes in a Resource-Constrained Setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and Validation of a Simple Risk Score for Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes in a Resource-Constrained Setting |
title_short | Development and Validation of a Simple Risk Score for Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes in a Resource-Constrained Setting |
title_sort | development and validation of a simple risk score for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in a resource-constrained setting |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5027039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27689096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8790235 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bernabeortizantonio developmentandvalidationofasimpleriskscoreforundiagnosedtype2diabetesinaresourceconstrainedsetting AT smeethliam developmentandvalidationofasimpleriskscoreforundiagnosedtype2diabetesinaresourceconstrainedsetting AT gilmanroberth developmentandvalidationofasimpleriskscoreforundiagnosedtype2diabetesinaresourceconstrainedsetting AT sanchezabantojoser developmentandvalidationofasimpleriskscoreforundiagnosedtype2diabetesinaresourceconstrainedsetting AT checkleywilliam developmentandvalidationofasimpleriskscoreforundiagnosedtype2diabetesinaresourceconstrainedsetting AT mirandajjaime developmentandvalidationofasimpleriskscoreforundiagnosedtype2diabetesinaresourceconstrainedsetting AT studygroupcronicascohort developmentandvalidationofasimpleriskscoreforundiagnosedtype2diabetesinaresourceconstrainedsetting |