Cargando…

The effects of superimposed tilt and lower body negative pressure on anterior and posterior cerebral circulations

Steady‐state tilt has no effect on cerebrovascular reactivity to increases in the partial pressure of end‐tidal carbon dioxide (P(ET)CO (2)). However, the anterior and posterior cerebral circulations may respond differently to a variety of stimuli that alter central blood volume, including lower bod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tymko, Michael M., Rickards, Caroline A., Skow, Rachel J., Ingram‐Cotton, Nathan C., Howatt, Michael K., Day, Trevor A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5027361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27634108
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12957
Descripción
Sumario:Steady‐state tilt has no effect on cerebrovascular reactivity to increases in the partial pressure of end‐tidal carbon dioxide (P(ET)CO (2)). However, the anterior and posterior cerebral circulations may respond differently to a variety of stimuli that alter central blood volume, including lower body negative pressure (LBNP). Little is known about the superimposed effects of head‐up tilt (HUT; decreased central blood volume and intracranial pressure) and head‐down tilt (HDT; increased central blood volume and intracranial pressure), and LBNP on cerebral blood flow (CBF) responses. We hypothesized that (a) cerebral blood velocity (CBV; an index of CBF) responses during LBNP would not change with HUT and HDT, and (b) CBV in the anterior cerebral circulation would decrease to a greater extent compared to posterior CBV during LBNP when controlling P(ET)CO (2). In 13 male participants, we measured CBV in the anterior (middle cerebral artery, MCAv) and posterior (posterior cerebral artery, PCAv) cerebral circulations using transcranial Doppler ultrasound during LBNP stress (−50 mmHg) in three body positions (45°HUT, supine, 45°HDT). P(ET)CO (2) was measured continuously and maintained at constant levels during LBNP through coached breathing. Our main findings were that (a) steady‐state tilt had no effect on CBV responses during LBNP in both the MCA (P = 0.077) and PCA (P = 0.583), and (b) despite controlling for P(ET)CO (2), both the MCAv and PCAv decreased by the same magnitude during LBNP in HUT (P = 0.348), supine (P = 0.694), and HDT (P = 0.407). Here, we demonstrate that there are no differences in anterior and posterior circulations in response to LBNP in different body positions.