Cargando…
Resolution criteria in double-slit microscopic imaging experiments
Double-slit imaging is widely used for verifying the resolution of high-resolution and super-resolution microscopies. However, due to the fabrication limits, the slit width is generally non-negligible, which can affect the claimed resolution. In this paper we theoretically calculate the electromagne...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5027385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27640808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep33764 |
_version_ | 1782454236334784512 |
---|---|
author | You, Shangting Kuang, Cuifang Zhang, Baile |
author_facet | You, Shangting Kuang, Cuifang Zhang, Baile |
author_sort | You, Shangting |
collection | PubMed |
description | Double-slit imaging is widely used for verifying the resolution of high-resolution and super-resolution microscopies. However, due to the fabrication limits, the slit width is generally non-negligible, which can affect the claimed resolution. In this paper we theoretically calculate the electromagnetic field distribution inside and near the metallic double slit using waveguide mode expansion method, and acquire the far-field image by vectorial Fourier optics. We find that the slit width has minimal influence when the illuminating light is polarized parallel to the slits. In this case, the claimed resolution should be based on the center-to-center distance of the double-slit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5027385 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50273852016-09-22 Resolution criteria in double-slit microscopic imaging experiments You, Shangting Kuang, Cuifang Zhang, Baile Sci Rep Article Double-slit imaging is widely used for verifying the resolution of high-resolution and super-resolution microscopies. However, due to the fabrication limits, the slit width is generally non-negligible, which can affect the claimed resolution. In this paper we theoretically calculate the electromagnetic field distribution inside and near the metallic double slit using waveguide mode expansion method, and acquire the far-field image by vectorial Fourier optics. We find that the slit width has minimal influence when the illuminating light is polarized parallel to the slits. In this case, the claimed resolution should be based on the center-to-center distance of the double-slit. Nature Publishing Group 2016-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5027385/ /pubmed/27640808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep33764 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article You, Shangting Kuang, Cuifang Zhang, Baile Resolution criteria in double-slit microscopic imaging experiments |
title | Resolution criteria in double-slit microscopic imaging experiments |
title_full | Resolution criteria in double-slit microscopic imaging experiments |
title_fullStr | Resolution criteria in double-slit microscopic imaging experiments |
title_full_unstemmed | Resolution criteria in double-slit microscopic imaging experiments |
title_short | Resolution criteria in double-slit microscopic imaging experiments |
title_sort | resolution criteria in double-slit microscopic imaging experiments |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5027385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27640808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep33764 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT youshangting resolutioncriteriaindoubleslitmicroscopicimagingexperiments AT kuangcuifang resolutioncriteriaindoubleslitmicroscopicimagingexperiments AT zhangbaile resolutioncriteriaindoubleslitmicroscopicimagingexperiments |