Cargando…

Size-Exclusion Chromatography-based isolation minimally alters Extracellular Vesicles’ characteristics compared to precipitating agents

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have become an attractive field among the scientific community. Yet, a major challenge is to define a consensus method for EVs isolation. Ultracentrifugation has been the most widely used methodology but rapid methods, including Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC) and/or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gámez-Valero, Ana, Monguió-Tortajada, Marta, Carreras-Planella, Laura, Franquesa, Marcel·la, Beyer, Katrin, Borràs, Francesc E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5027519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27640641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep33641
_version_ 1782454250297622528
author Gámez-Valero, Ana
Monguió-Tortajada, Marta
Carreras-Planella, Laura
Franquesa, Marcel·la
Beyer, Katrin
Borràs, Francesc E.
author_facet Gámez-Valero, Ana
Monguió-Tortajada, Marta
Carreras-Planella, Laura
Franquesa, Marcel·la
Beyer, Katrin
Borràs, Francesc E.
author_sort Gámez-Valero, Ana
collection PubMed
description Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have become an attractive field among the scientific community. Yet, a major challenge is to define a consensus method for EVs isolation. Ultracentrifugation has been the most widely used methodology but rapid methods, including Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC) and/or precipitating agents such as Polyethylene glycol (PEG) or PRotein Organic Solvent PRecipitation (PROSPR) have emerged. To evaluate the impact of these different methods on the resulting EV preparations, plasma EVs were isolated using SEC, PEG and PROSPR, and their total protein content, NTA and Cryo-electron microscopy profiles, and EV-markers were compared. Also, their effect on recipient cells was tested. Low protein content and Cryo-EM analysis showed that SEC removed most of the overabundant soluble plasma proteins, which were not removed using PEG and partially by PROSPR. Moreover, only SEC allowed the detection of the EV-markers CD9, CD63 and CD81, LGALS3BP and CD5L, suggesting a putative interference of the precipitating agents in the structure/composition of the EVs. Furthermore, PEG and PROSPR-based EV isolation resulted in reduced cell viability in vitro. These results stress that appropriate EV-isolation method should be considered depending on the forthcoming application of the purified EVs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5027519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50275192016-09-22 Size-Exclusion Chromatography-based isolation minimally alters Extracellular Vesicles’ characteristics compared to precipitating agents Gámez-Valero, Ana Monguió-Tortajada, Marta Carreras-Planella, Laura Franquesa, Marcel·la Beyer, Katrin Borràs, Francesc E. Sci Rep Article Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have become an attractive field among the scientific community. Yet, a major challenge is to define a consensus method for EVs isolation. Ultracentrifugation has been the most widely used methodology but rapid methods, including Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC) and/or precipitating agents such as Polyethylene glycol (PEG) or PRotein Organic Solvent PRecipitation (PROSPR) have emerged. To evaluate the impact of these different methods on the resulting EV preparations, plasma EVs were isolated using SEC, PEG and PROSPR, and their total protein content, NTA and Cryo-electron microscopy profiles, and EV-markers were compared. Also, their effect on recipient cells was tested. Low protein content and Cryo-EM analysis showed that SEC removed most of the overabundant soluble plasma proteins, which were not removed using PEG and partially by PROSPR. Moreover, only SEC allowed the detection of the EV-markers CD9, CD63 and CD81, LGALS3BP and CD5L, suggesting a putative interference of the precipitating agents in the structure/composition of the EVs. Furthermore, PEG and PROSPR-based EV isolation resulted in reduced cell viability in vitro. These results stress that appropriate EV-isolation method should be considered depending on the forthcoming application of the purified EVs. Nature Publishing Group 2016-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5027519/ /pubmed/27640641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep33641 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Gámez-Valero, Ana
Monguió-Tortajada, Marta
Carreras-Planella, Laura
Franquesa, Marcel·la
Beyer, Katrin
Borràs, Francesc E.
Size-Exclusion Chromatography-based isolation minimally alters Extracellular Vesicles’ characteristics compared to precipitating agents
title Size-Exclusion Chromatography-based isolation minimally alters Extracellular Vesicles’ characteristics compared to precipitating agents
title_full Size-Exclusion Chromatography-based isolation minimally alters Extracellular Vesicles’ characteristics compared to precipitating agents
title_fullStr Size-Exclusion Chromatography-based isolation minimally alters Extracellular Vesicles’ characteristics compared to precipitating agents
title_full_unstemmed Size-Exclusion Chromatography-based isolation minimally alters Extracellular Vesicles’ characteristics compared to precipitating agents
title_short Size-Exclusion Chromatography-based isolation minimally alters Extracellular Vesicles’ characteristics compared to precipitating agents
title_sort size-exclusion chromatography-based isolation minimally alters extracellular vesicles’ characteristics compared to precipitating agents
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5027519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27640641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep33641
work_keys_str_mv AT gamezvaleroana sizeexclusionchromatographybasedisolationminimallyaltersextracellularvesiclescharacteristicscomparedtoprecipitatingagents
AT monguiotortajadamarta sizeexclusionchromatographybasedisolationminimallyaltersextracellularvesiclescharacteristicscomparedtoprecipitatingagents
AT carrerasplanellalaura sizeexclusionchromatographybasedisolationminimallyaltersextracellularvesiclescharacteristicscomparedtoprecipitatingagents
AT franquesamarcella sizeexclusionchromatographybasedisolationminimallyaltersextracellularvesiclescharacteristicscomparedtoprecipitatingagents
AT beyerkatrin sizeexclusionchromatographybasedisolationminimallyaltersextracellularvesiclescharacteristicscomparedtoprecipitatingagents
AT borrasfrancesce sizeexclusionchromatographybasedisolationminimallyaltersextracellularvesiclescharacteristicscomparedtoprecipitatingagents