Cargando…

Evaluation of potential immunogenicity differences between Pandemrix™ and Arepanrix™

In retrospective observational studies, an increased relative risk of incident narcolepsy was observed in some European countries among recipients of the AS03-adjuvanted, A(H1N1)pdm09, inactivated, detergent-split virion vaccine Pandemrix™ manufactured in Dresden, Germany (D-Pan H1N1). A similar inc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Canelle, Quentin, Dewé, Walthère, Innis, Bruce L., van der Most, Robbert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5027709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27105343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2016.1168954
_version_ 1782454283947474944
author Canelle, Quentin
Dewé, Walthère
Innis, Bruce L.
van der Most, Robbert
author_facet Canelle, Quentin
Dewé, Walthère
Innis, Bruce L.
van der Most, Robbert
author_sort Canelle, Quentin
collection PubMed
description In retrospective observational studies, an increased relative risk of incident narcolepsy was observed in some European countries among recipients of the AS03-adjuvanted, A(H1N1)pdm09, inactivated, detergent-split virion vaccine Pandemrix™ manufactured in Dresden, Germany (D-Pan H1N1). A similar increased risk was not observed in a retrospective population-based study in individuals in Quebec province, Canada, who received Aprepanrix™, a Quebec-manufactured AS03-adjuvanted A(H1N1)pdm09 inactivated, detergent-split virion vaccine (Q-Pan H1N1). Antibody responses in D-Pan versus Q-Pan vaccinees (adults/children) measured as hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers 21 d post-vaccination were found to be equivalent (NCT01161160). The current post-hoc analysis was conducted to determine whether antibody avidity differed following immunization with the 2 vaccines. Using surface plasmon resonance, we evaluated the capacity of serum specimens (drawn from the comparative immunogenicity trial) from a subset of subjects aged 3–9 y who received either D-Pan or Q-Pan (N = 28/group), to bind to recombinant A(H1N1)pdm09 hemagglutinin. IgG antibodies were purified from Day 21 sera. Binding was assessed by end association level; dissociation by retention of antigen-antibody complexes at the end of the dissociation phase, and k(d). Inter-run variability for the control monoclonal antibody, association levels and dissociation levels was low (CVs 1.3%, 7.8% and 1.4%, respectively); non-specific binding was negligible. High avidity and slow dissociation was observed for both groups (k(d) ≤ 10(−4)/s; geometric mean [IQR] association and dissociation levels for D-Pan/Q-Pan: 15.4 RU [13.4–17.7]/12.4 RU [10.8–14.3] and 94.5% [92.5–96.5]/95.5% [93.5–97.6], respectively). Association, but not dissociation levels correlated with HI titers. No significant differences in avidity parameters were observed between D-Pan and Q-Pan sera.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5027709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50277092016-11-01 Evaluation of potential immunogenicity differences between Pandemrix™ and Arepanrix™ Canelle, Quentin Dewé, Walthère Innis, Bruce L. van der Most, Robbert Hum Vaccin Immunother Research Papers In retrospective observational studies, an increased relative risk of incident narcolepsy was observed in some European countries among recipients of the AS03-adjuvanted, A(H1N1)pdm09, inactivated, detergent-split virion vaccine Pandemrix™ manufactured in Dresden, Germany (D-Pan H1N1). A similar increased risk was not observed in a retrospective population-based study in individuals in Quebec province, Canada, who received Aprepanrix™, a Quebec-manufactured AS03-adjuvanted A(H1N1)pdm09 inactivated, detergent-split virion vaccine (Q-Pan H1N1). Antibody responses in D-Pan versus Q-Pan vaccinees (adults/children) measured as hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers 21 d post-vaccination were found to be equivalent (NCT01161160). The current post-hoc analysis was conducted to determine whether antibody avidity differed following immunization with the 2 vaccines. Using surface plasmon resonance, we evaluated the capacity of serum specimens (drawn from the comparative immunogenicity trial) from a subset of subjects aged 3–9 y who received either D-Pan or Q-Pan (N = 28/group), to bind to recombinant A(H1N1)pdm09 hemagglutinin. IgG antibodies were purified from Day 21 sera. Binding was assessed by end association level; dissociation by retention of antigen-antibody complexes at the end of the dissociation phase, and k(d). Inter-run variability for the control monoclonal antibody, association levels and dissociation levels was low (CVs 1.3%, 7.8% and 1.4%, respectively); non-specific binding was negligible. High avidity and slow dissociation was observed for both groups (k(d) ≤ 10(−4)/s; geometric mean [IQR] association and dissociation levels for D-Pan/Q-Pan: 15.4 RU [13.4–17.7]/12.4 RU [10.8–14.3] and 94.5% [92.5–96.5]/95.5% [93.5–97.6], respectively). Association, but not dissociation levels correlated with HI titers. No significant differences in avidity parameters were observed between D-Pan and Q-Pan sera. Taylor & Francis 2016-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5027709/ /pubmed/27105343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2016.1168954 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Canelle, Quentin
Dewé, Walthère
Innis, Bruce L.
van der Most, Robbert
Evaluation of potential immunogenicity differences between Pandemrix™ and Arepanrix™
title Evaluation of potential immunogenicity differences between Pandemrix™ and Arepanrix™
title_full Evaluation of potential immunogenicity differences between Pandemrix™ and Arepanrix™
title_fullStr Evaluation of potential immunogenicity differences between Pandemrix™ and Arepanrix™
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of potential immunogenicity differences between Pandemrix™ and Arepanrix™
title_short Evaluation of potential immunogenicity differences between Pandemrix™ and Arepanrix™
title_sort evaluation of potential immunogenicity differences between pandemrix™ and arepanrix™
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5027709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27105343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2016.1168954
work_keys_str_mv AT canellequentin evaluationofpotentialimmunogenicitydifferencesbetweenpandemrixandarepanrix
AT dewewalthere evaluationofpotentialimmunogenicitydifferencesbetweenpandemrixandarepanrix
AT innisbrucel evaluationofpotentialimmunogenicitydifferencesbetweenpandemrixandarepanrix
AT vandermostrobbert evaluationofpotentialimmunogenicitydifferencesbetweenpandemrixandarepanrix