Cargando…
The 11-year long-term follow-up study from the randomized BENEFIT CIS trial
OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes for patients treated with interferon beta-1b immediately after clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) or after a short delay. METHODS: Participants in BENEFIT (Betaferon/Betaseron in Newly Emerging MS for Initial Treatment) were randomly assigned to receive interferon beta-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5027814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27511182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003078 |
_version_ | 1782454301193404416 |
---|---|
author | Kappos, Ludwig Edan, Gilles Freedman, Mark S. Montalbán, Xavier Hartung, Hans-Peter Hemmer, Bernhard Fox, Edward J. Barkhof, Frederik Schippling, Sven Schulze, Andrea Pleimes, Dirk Pohl, Christoph Sandbrink, Rupert Suarez, Gustavo Wicklein, Eva-Maria |
author_facet | Kappos, Ludwig Edan, Gilles Freedman, Mark S. Montalbán, Xavier Hartung, Hans-Peter Hemmer, Bernhard Fox, Edward J. Barkhof, Frederik Schippling, Sven Schulze, Andrea Pleimes, Dirk Pohl, Christoph Sandbrink, Rupert Suarez, Gustavo Wicklein, Eva-Maria |
author_sort | Kappos, Ludwig |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes for patients treated with interferon beta-1b immediately after clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) or after a short delay. METHODS: Participants in BENEFIT (Betaferon/Betaseron in Newly Emerging MS for Initial Treatment) were randomly assigned to receive interferon beta-1b (early treatment) or placebo (delayed treatment). After conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS) or 2 years, patients on placebo could switch to interferon beta-1b or another treatment. Eleven years after randomization, patients were reassessed. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-eight (59.4%) of the original 468 patients (71.3% of those eligible at participating sites) were enrolled (early: 167 [57.2%]; delayed: 111 [63.1%]). After 11 years, risk of CDMS remained lower in the early-treatment arm compared with the delayed-treatment arm (p = 0.0012), with longer time to first relapse (median [Q1, Q3] days: 1,888 [540, not reached] vs 931 [253, 3,296]; p = 0.0005) and lower overall annualized relapse rate (0.21 vs 0.26; p = 0.0018). Only 25 patients (5.9%, overall; early, 4.5%; delayed, 8.3%) converted to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Expanded Disability Status Scale scores remained low and stable, with no difference between treatment arms (median [Q1, Q3]: 2.0 [1.0, 3.0]). The early-treatment group had better Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task–3 total scores (p = 0.0070). Employment rates remained high, and health resource utilization tended to be low in both groups. MRI metrics did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although the delay in treatment was relatively short, several clinical outcomes favored earlier treatment. Along with low rates of disability and disease progression in both groups, this supports the value of treatment at CIS. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01795872. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that early compared to delayed treatment prolongs time to CDMS in CIS after 11 years. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5027814 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50278142016-09-27 The 11-year long-term follow-up study from the randomized BENEFIT CIS trial Kappos, Ludwig Edan, Gilles Freedman, Mark S. Montalbán, Xavier Hartung, Hans-Peter Hemmer, Bernhard Fox, Edward J. Barkhof, Frederik Schippling, Sven Schulze, Andrea Pleimes, Dirk Pohl, Christoph Sandbrink, Rupert Suarez, Gustavo Wicklein, Eva-Maria Neurology Article OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes for patients treated with interferon beta-1b immediately after clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) or after a short delay. METHODS: Participants in BENEFIT (Betaferon/Betaseron in Newly Emerging MS for Initial Treatment) were randomly assigned to receive interferon beta-1b (early treatment) or placebo (delayed treatment). After conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS) or 2 years, patients on placebo could switch to interferon beta-1b or another treatment. Eleven years after randomization, patients were reassessed. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-eight (59.4%) of the original 468 patients (71.3% of those eligible at participating sites) were enrolled (early: 167 [57.2%]; delayed: 111 [63.1%]). After 11 years, risk of CDMS remained lower in the early-treatment arm compared with the delayed-treatment arm (p = 0.0012), with longer time to first relapse (median [Q1, Q3] days: 1,888 [540, not reached] vs 931 [253, 3,296]; p = 0.0005) and lower overall annualized relapse rate (0.21 vs 0.26; p = 0.0018). Only 25 patients (5.9%, overall; early, 4.5%; delayed, 8.3%) converted to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Expanded Disability Status Scale scores remained low and stable, with no difference between treatment arms (median [Q1, Q3]: 2.0 [1.0, 3.0]). The early-treatment group had better Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task–3 total scores (p = 0.0070). Employment rates remained high, and health resource utilization tended to be low in both groups. MRI metrics did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although the delay in treatment was relatively short, several clinical outcomes favored earlier treatment. Along with low rates of disability and disease progression in both groups, this supports the value of treatment at CIS. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01795872. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that early compared to delayed treatment prolongs time to CDMS in CIS after 11 years. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5027814/ /pubmed/27511182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003078 Text en © 2016 American Academy of Neurology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. |
spellingShingle | Article Kappos, Ludwig Edan, Gilles Freedman, Mark S. Montalbán, Xavier Hartung, Hans-Peter Hemmer, Bernhard Fox, Edward J. Barkhof, Frederik Schippling, Sven Schulze, Andrea Pleimes, Dirk Pohl, Christoph Sandbrink, Rupert Suarez, Gustavo Wicklein, Eva-Maria The 11-year long-term follow-up study from the randomized BENEFIT CIS trial |
title | The 11-year long-term follow-up study from the randomized BENEFIT CIS trial |
title_full | The 11-year long-term follow-up study from the randomized BENEFIT CIS trial |
title_fullStr | The 11-year long-term follow-up study from the randomized BENEFIT CIS trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The 11-year long-term follow-up study from the randomized BENEFIT CIS trial |
title_short | The 11-year long-term follow-up study from the randomized BENEFIT CIS trial |
title_sort | 11-year long-term follow-up study from the randomized benefit cis trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5027814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27511182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003078 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kapposludwig the11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT edangilles the11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT freedmanmarks the11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT montalbanxavier the11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT hartunghanspeter the11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT hemmerbernhard the11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT foxedwardj the11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT barkhoffrederik the11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT schipplingsven the11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT schulzeandrea the11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT pleimesdirk the11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT pohlchristoph the11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT sandbrinkrupert the11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT suarezgustavo the11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT wickleinevamaria the11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT the11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT kapposludwig 11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT edangilles 11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT freedmanmarks 11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT montalbanxavier 11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT hartunghanspeter 11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT hemmerbernhard 11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT foxedwardj 11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT barkhoffrederik 11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT schipplingsven 11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT schulzeandrea 11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT pleimesdirk 11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT pohlchristoph 11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT sandbrinkrupert 11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT suarezgustavo 11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT wickleinevamaria 11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial AT 11yearlongtermfollowupstudyfromtherandomizedbenefitcistrial |