Cargando…
Blood metal ion levels are not a useful test for adverse reactions to metal debris: A systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVES: Alarm over the reported high failure rates for metal-on-metal (MoM) hip implants as well as their potential for locally aggressive Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris (ARMDs) has prompted government agencies, internationally, to recommend the monitoring of patients with MoM hip implants. S...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5027892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27612918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.59.BJR-2016-0027.R1 |
_version_ | 1782454308742103040 |
---|---|
author | Pahuta, M. Smolders, J. M. van Susante, J. L. Peck, J. Kim, P. R. Beaule, P. E. |
author_facet | Pahuta, M. Smolders, J. M. van Susante, J. L. Peck, J. Kim, P. R. Beaule, P. E. |
author_sort | Pahuta, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Alarm over the reported high failure rates for metal-on-metal (MoM) hip implants as well as their potential for locally aggressive Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris (ARMDs) has prompted government agencies, internationally, to recommend the monitoring of patients with MoM hip implants. Some have advised that a blood ion level >7 µg/L indicates potential for ARMDs. We report a systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of metal ion testing for ARMDs. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify articles from which it was possible to reconstruct a 2 × 2 table. Two readers independently reviewed all articles and extracted data using explicit criteria. We computed a summary receiver operating curve using a Bayesian random-effects hierarchical model. RESULTS: Our literature search returned 575 unique articles; only six met inclusion criteria defined a priori. The discriminative capacity of ion tests was homogeneous across studies but that there was substantial cut-point heterogeneity. Our best estimate of the “true” area under curve (AUC) for metal ion testing is 0.615, with a 95% credible interval of 0.480 to 0.735, thus we can state that the probability that metal ion testing is actually clinically useful with an AUC ≥ 0.75 is 1.7%. CONCLUSION: Metal ion levels are not useful as a screening test for identifying high risk patients because ion testing will either lead to a large burden of false positive patients, or otherwise marginally modify the pre-test probability. With the availability of more accurate non-invasive tests, we did not find any evidence for using blood ion levels to diagnose symptomatic patients. Cite this article: M. Pahuta, J. M. Smolders, J. L. van Susante, J. Peck, P. R. Kim, P. E. Beaule. Blood metal ion levels are not a useful test for adverse reactions to metal debris: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:379–386. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.59.BJR-2016-0027.R1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5027892 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50278922016-09-30 Blood metal ion levels are not a useful test for adverse reactions to metal debris: A systematic review and meta-analysis Pahuta, M. Smolders, J. M. van Susante, J. L. Peck, J. Kim, P. R. Beaule, P. E. Bone Joint Res Hip OBJECTIVES: Alarm over the reported high failure rates for metal-on-metal (MoM) hip implants as well as their potential for locally aggressive Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris (ARMDs) has prompted government agencies, internationally, to recommend the monitoring of patients with MoM hip implants. Some have advised that a blood ion level >7 µg/L indicates potential for ARMDs. We report a systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of metal ion testing for ARMDs. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify articles from which it was possible to reconstruct a 2 × 2 table. Two readers independently reviewed all articles and extracted data using explicit criteria. We computed a summary receiver operating curve using a Bayesian random-effects hierarchical model. RESULTS: Our literature search returned 575 unique articles; only six met inclusion criteria defined a priori. The discriminative capacity of ion tests was homogeneous across studies but that there was substantial cut-point heterogeneity. Our best estimate of the “true” area under curve (AUC) for metal ion testing is 0.615, with a 95% credible interval of 0.480 to 0.735, thus we can state that the probability that metal ion testing is actually clinically useful with an AUC ≥ 0.75 is 1.7%. CONCLUSION: Metal ion levels are not useful as a screening test for identifying high risk patients because ion testing will either lead to a large burden of false positive patients, or otherwise marginally modify the pre-test probability. With the availability of more accurate non-invasive tests, we did not find any evidence for using blood ion levels to diagnose symptomatic patients. Cite this article: M. Pahuta, J. M. Smolders, J. L. van Susante, J. Peck, P. R. Kim, P. E. Beaule. Blood metal ion levels are not a useful test for adverse reactions to metal debris: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:379–386. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.59.BJR-2016-0027.R1. 2016-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5027892/ /pubmed/27612918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.59.BJR-2016-0027.R1 Text en © 2016 Pahuta et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence (CC-BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Hip Pahuta, M. Smolders, J. M. van Susante, J. L. Peck, J. Kim, P. R. Beaule, P. E. Blood metal ion levels are not a useful test for adverse reactions to metal debris: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Blood metal ion levels are not a useful test for adverse reactions to metal debris: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Blood metal ion levels are not a useful test for adverse reactions to metal debris: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Blood metal ion levels are not a useful test for adverse reactions to metal debris: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Blood metal ion levels are not a useful test for adverse reactions to metal debris: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Blood metal ion levels are not a useful test for adverse reactions to metal debris: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | blood metal ion levels are not a useful test for adverse reactions to metal debris: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Hip |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5027892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27612918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.59.BJR-2016-0027.R1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pahutam bloodmetalionlevelsarenotausefultestforadversereactionstometaldebrisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT smoldersjm bloodmetalionlevelsarenotausefultestforadversereactionstometaldebrisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vansusantejl bloodmetalionlevelsarenotausefultestforadversereactionstometaldebrisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT peckj bloodmetalionlevelsarenotausefultestforadversereactionstometaldebrisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kimpr bloodmetalionlevelsarenotausefultestforadversereactionstometaldebrisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT beaulepe bloodmetalionlevelsarenotausefultestforadversereactionstometaldebrisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |