Cargando…
Clinical prediction rules for failed nonoperative reduction of intussusception
PURPOSE: The nonoperative reduction of intussusception in children can be performed safely if there are no contraindications. Many risk factors associated with failed reduction were defined. The aim of this study was to develop a scoring system for predicting the failure of nonoperative reduction us...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5028175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27695337 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S115253 |
_version_ | 1782454343622983680 |
---|---|
author | Khorana, Jiraporn Patumanond, Jayanton Ukarapol, Nuthapong Laohapensang, Mongkol Visrutaratna, Pannee Singhavejsakul, Jesda |
author_facet | Khorana, Jiraporn Patumanond, Jayanton Ukarapol, Nuthapong Laohapensang, Mongkol Visrutaratna, Pannee Singhavejsakul, Jesda |
author_sort | Khorana, Jiraporn |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The nonoperative reduction of intussusception in children can be performed safely if there are no contraindications. Many risk factors associated with failed reduction were defined. The aim of this study was to develop a scoring system for predicting the failure of nonoperative reduction using various determinants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data were collected from Chiang Mai University Hospital and Siriraj Hospital from January 2006 to December 2012. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients with intussusception aged 0–15 years with no contraindications for nonoperative reduction. The clinical prediction rules were developed using significant risk factors from the multivariable analysis. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients with intussusception were included in the study. In the final analysis model, 154 patients were used for identifying the significant risk factors of failure of reduction. Ten factors clustering by the age of 3 years were identified and used for developing the clinical prediction rules, and the factors were as follows: body weight <12 kg (relative risk [RR] =1.48, P=0.004), duration of symptoms >48 hours (RR =1.26, P<0.001), vomiting (RR =1.63, P<0.001), rectal bleeding (RR =1.50, P<0.001), abdominal distension (RR =1.60, P=0.003), temperature >37.8°C (RR =1.51, P<0.001), palpable mass (RR =1.26, P<0.001), location of mass (left over right side RR =1.48, P<0.001), ultrasound showed poor prognostic signs (RR =1.35, P<0.001), and the method of reduction (hydrostatic over pneumatic, RR =1.34, P=0.023). Prediction scores ranged from 0 to 16. A high-risk group (scores 12–16) predicted a greater chance of reduction failure (likelihood ratio of positive [LR+] =18.22, P<0.001). A low-risk group (score 0–11) predicted a lower chance of reduction failure (LR+ =0.79, P<0.001). The performance of the scoring model was 80.68% (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve). CONCLUSION: This scoring guideline was used to predict the results of nonoperative reduction and forecast the prognosis of the failed reduction. The usefulness of these prediction scores is for informing the parents before the reduction. This scoring system can be used as a guide to promote the possible referral of the cases to tertiary centers with facilities for nonoperative reduction if possible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5028175 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50281752016-09-30 Clinical prediction rules for failed nonoperative reduction of intussusception Khorana, Jiraporn Patumanond, Jayanton Ukarapol, Nuthapong Laohapensang, Mongkol Visrutaratna, Pannee Singhavejsakul, Jesda Ther Clin Risk Manag Original Research PURPOSE: The nonoperative reduction of intussusception in children can be performed safely if there are no contraindications. Many risk factors associated with failed reduction were defined. The aim of this study was to develop a scoring system for predicting the failure of nonoperative reduction using various determinants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data were collected from Chiang Mai University Hospital and Siriraj Hospital from January 2006 to December 2012. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients with intussusception aged 0–15 years with no contraindications for nonoperative reduction. The clinical prediction rules were developed using significant risk factors from the multivariable analysis. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients with intussusception were included in the study. In the final analysis model, 154 patients were used for identifying the significant risk factors of failure of reduction. Ten factors clustering by the age of 3 years were identified and used for developing the clinical prediction rules, and the factors were as follows: body weight <12 kg (relative risk [RR] =1.48, P=0.004), duration of symptoms >48 hours (RR =1.26, P<0.001), vomiting (RR =1.63, P<0.001), rectal bleeding (RR =1.50, P<0.001), abdominal distension (RR =1.60, P=0.003), temperature >37.8°C (RR =1.51, P<0.001), palpable mass (RR =1.26, P<0.001), location of mass (left over right side RR =1.48, P<0.001), ultrasound showed poor prognostic signs (RR =1.35, P<0.001), and the method of reduction (hydrostatic over pneumatic, RR =1.34, P=0.023). Prediction scores ranged from 0 to 16. A high-risk group (scores 12–16) predicted a greater chance of reduction failure (likelihood ratio of positive [LR+] =18.22, P<0.001). A low-risk group (score 0–11) predicted a lower chance of reduction failure (LR+ =0.79, P<0.001). The performance of the scoring model was 80.68% (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve). CONCLUSION: This scoring guideline was used to predict the results of nonoperative reduction and forecast the prognosis of the failed reduction. The usefulness of these prediction scores is for informing the parents before the reduction. This scoring system can be used as a guide to promote the possible referral of the cases to tertiary centers with facilities for nonoperative reduction if possible. Dove Medical Press 2016-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5028175/ /pubmed/27695337 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S115253 Text en © 2016 Khorana et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Khorana, Jiraporn Patumanond, Jayanton Ukarapol, Nuthapong Laohapensang, Mongkol Visrutaratna, Pannee Singhavejsakul, Jesda Clinical prediction rules for failed nonoperative reduction of intussusception |
title | Clinical prediction rules for failed nonoperative reduction of intussusception |
title_full | Clinical prediction rules for failed nonoperative reduction of intussusception |
title_fullStr | Clinical prediction rules for failed nonoperative reduction of intussusception |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical prediction rules for failed nonoperative reduction of intussusception |
title_short | Clinical prediction rules for failed nonoperative reduction of intussusception |
title_sort | clinical prediction rules for failed nonoperative reduction of intussusception |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5028175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27695337 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S115253 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khoranajiraporn clinicalpredictionrulesforfailednonoperativereductionofintussusception AT patumanondjayanton clinicalpredictionrulesforfailednonoperativereductionofintussusception AT ukarapolnuthapong clinicalpredictionrulesforfailednonoperativereductionofintussusception AT laohapensangmongkol clinicalpredictionrulesforfailednonoperativereductionofintussusception AT visrutaratnapannee clinicalpredictionrulesforfailednonoperativereductionofintussusception AT singhavejsakuljesda clinicalpredictionrulesforfailednonoperativereductionofintussusception |