Cargando…

Which One Is Better to Reduce the Infection Rate, Early or Late Cranioplasty?

OBJECTIVE: Decompressive craniectomy is an effective therapy to relieve high intracranial pressure after acute brain damage. However, the optimal timing for cranioplasty after decompression is still controversial. Many authors reported that early cranioplasty may contribute to improve the cerebral b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oh, Jae-Sang, Lee, Kyeong-Seok, Shim, Jai-Joon, Yoon, Seok-Mann, Doh, Jae-Won, Bae, Hack-Gun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Neurosurgical Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5028610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27651868
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.59.5.492
_version_ 1782454369787052032
author Oh, Jae-Sang
Lee, Kyeong-Seok
Shim, Jai-Joon
Yoon, Seok-Mann
Doh, Jae-Won
Bae, Hack-Gun
author_facet Oh, Jae-Sang
Lee, Kyeong-Seok
Shim, Jai-Joon
Yoon, Seok-Mann
Doh, Jae-Won
Bae, Hack-Gun
author_sort Oh, Jae-Sang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Decompressive craniectomy is an effective therapy to relieve high intracranial pressure after acute brain damage. However, the optimal timing for cranioplasty after decompression is still controversial. Many authors reported that early cranioplasty may contribute to improve the cerebral blood flow and brain metabolism. However, despite all the advantages, there always remains a concern that early cranioplasty may increase the chance of infection. The purpose of this retrospective study is to investigate whether the early cranioplasty increase the infection rate. We also evaluated the risk factors of infection following cranioplasty. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the results of 131 patients who underwent cranioplasty in our institution between January 2008 and June 2015. We divided them into early (≤90 days) and late (>90 days after craniectomy) groups. We examined the risk factors of infection after cranioplasty. We analyzed the infection rate between two groups. RESULTS: There were more male patients (62%) than female (38%). The mean age was 49 years. Infection occurred in 17 patients (13%) after cranioplasty. The infection rate of early cranioplasty was lower than that of late cranioplasty (7% vs. 20%; p=0.02). Early cranioplasty, non-metal allograft materials, re-operation before cranioplasty and younger age were the significant factors in the infection rate after cranioplasty (p<0.05). Especially allograft was a significant risk factor of infection (odds ratio, 12.4; 95% confidence interval, 3.24–47.33; p<0.01). Younger age was also a significant risk factor of infection after cranioplasty by multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.96–0.99; p=0.02). CONCLUSION: Early cranioplasty did not increase the infection rate in this study. The use of non-metal allograft materials influenced a more important role in infection in cranioplasty. Actually, timing itself was not a significant risk factor in multivariate analysis. So the early cranioplasty may bring better outcomes in cognitive functions or wound without raising the infection rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5028610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Neurosurgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50286102016-09-20 Which One Is Better to Reduce the Infection Rate, Early or Late Cranioplasty? Oh, Jae-Sang Lee, Kyeong-Seok Shim, Jai-Joon Yoon, Seok-Mann Doh, Jae-Won Bae, Hack-Gun J Korean Neurosurg Soc Clinical Article OBJECTIVE: Decompressive craniectomy is an effective therapy to relieve high intracranial pressure after acute brain damage. However, the optimal timing for cranioplasty after decompression is still controversial. Many authors reported that early cranioplasty may contribute to improve the cerebral blood flow and brain metabolism. However, despite all the advantages, there always remains a concern that early cranioplasty may increase the chance of infection. The purpose of this retrospective study is to investigate whether the early cranioplasty increase the infection rate. We also evaluated the risk factors of infection following cranioplasty. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the results of 131 patients who underwent cranioplasty in our institution between January 2008 and June 2015. We divided them into early (≤90 days) and late (>90 days after craniectomy) groups. We examined the risk factors of infection after cranioplasty. We analyzed the infection rate between two groups. RESULTS: There were more male patients (62%) than female (38%). The mean age was 49 years. Infection occurred in 17 patients (13%) after cranioplasty. The infection rate of early cranioplasty was lower than that of late cranioplasty (7% vs. 20%; p=0.02). Early cranioplasty, non-metal allograft materials, re-operation before cranioplasty and younger age were the significant factors in the infection rate after cranioplasty (p<0.05). Especially allograft was a significant risk factor of infection (odds ratio, 12.4; 95% confidence interval, 3.24–47.33; p<0.01). Younger age was also a significant risk factor of infection after cranioplasty by multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.96–0.99; p=0.02). CONCLUSION: Early cranioplasty did not increase the infection rate in this study. The use of non-metal allograft materials influenced a more important role in infection in cranioplasty. Actually, timing itself was not a significant risk factor in multivariate analysis. So the early cranioplasty may bring better outcomes in cognitive functions or wound without raising the infection rate. The Korean Neurosurgical Society 2016-09 2016-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5028610/ /pubmed/27651868 http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.59.5.492 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Korean Neurosurgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Article
Oh, Jae-Sang
Lee, Kyeong-Seok
Shim, Jai-Joon
Yoon, Seok-Mann
Doh, Jae-Won
Bae, Hack-Gun
Which One Is Better to Reduce the Infection Rate, Early or Late Cranioplasty?
title Which One Is Better to Reduce the Infection Rate, Early or Late Cranioplasty?
title_full Which One Is Better to Reduce the Infection Rate, Early or Late Cranioplasty?
title_fullStr Which One Is Better to Reduce the Infection Rate, Early or Late Cranioplasty?
title_full_unstemmed Which One Is Better to Reduce the Infection Rate, Early or Late Cranioplasty?
title_short Which One Is Better to Reduce the Infection Rate, Early or Late Cranioplasty?
title_sort which one is better to reduce the infection rate, early or late cranioplasty?
topic Clinical Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5028610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27651868
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.59.5.492
work_keys_str_mv AT ohjaesang whichoneisbettertoreducetheinfectionrateearlyorlatecranioplasty
AT leekyeongseok whichoneisbettertoreducetheinfectionrateearlyorlatecranioplasty
AT shimjaijoon whichoneisbettertoreducetheinfectionrateearlyorlatecranioplasty
AT yoonseokmann whichoneisbettertoreducetheinfectionrateearlyorlatecranioplasty
AT dohjaewon whichoneisbettertoreducetheinfectionrateearlyorlatecranioplasty
AT baehackgun whichoneisbettertoreducetheinfectionrateearlyorlatecranioplasty