Cargando…

Specimen retrieval during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it safe not to use a retrieval bag?

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of laparoscopic surgery for gallbladder disease different types of retrieval devices have been used to extract the gallbladder from the peritoneal cavity. These devises infer additional costs and may lead to associated risks and complications. We aimed to evaluate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Majid, Muhamed Hamid, Meshkat, Babak, Kohar, Haseeb, El Masry, Sherif
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5028946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27643488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-016-0181-y
_version_ 1782454429858922496
author Majid, Muhamed Hamid
Meshkat, Babak
Kohar, Haseeb
El Masry, Sherif
author_facet Majid, Muhamed Hamid
Meshkat, Babak
Kohar, Haseeb
El Masry, Sherif
author_sort Majid, Muhamed Hamid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of laparoscopic surgery for gallbladder disease different types of retrieval devices have been used to extract the gallbladder from the peritoneal cavity. These devises infer additional costs and may lead to associated risks and complications. We aimed to evaluate the safety of gallbladder retrieval without the use of a retrieval device. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted across two teaching hospitals in the Republic of Ireland from July 2010–2013. Patients undergoing planed elective day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the two institutions were included in the study. Data were collected on patient demographics, the use of a bag, any need for extension of fascial incision, any unexpected over night stay, any 30-day post operative complications and presence of port site hernia within 1 year surgery. RESULTS: There were 373 planned elective day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed during the study period. A bag was not used to retrieve the gallbladder in 41 % (n = 152) patients. A retrieval bag was used in the majority of patients (71 %) who required over night stay due to pain. Overall wound infection rate was low (2.4 %), with 57 % of those being in patients where no retrieval bag was used. An increase incision in the fascia was required in 9.7 % of patients. The majority of these were in patients in whom a retrieval bag was used (75 %). At 1 year follow up, there were no recorded cases of port site hernia for the no retrieval bag group and two (0.9 %) cases of umbilical port site hernias in the group where retrieval bag was used. CONCLUSION: In cases of elective uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy for radiologically confirmed benign disease there was no benefit in using a retrieval bag. Furthermore, not using a bag was associated with less need for increasing the size of the fascial incision thereby reducing post operative pain and risk of port site hernia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5028946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50289462016-09-22 Specimen retrieval during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it safe not to use a retrieval bag? Majid, Muhamed Hamid Meshkat, Babak Kohar, Haseeb El Masry, Sherif BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of laparoscopic surgery for gallbladder disease different types of retrieval devices have been used to extract the gallbladder from the peritoneal cavity. These devises infer additional costs and may lead to associated risks and complications. We aimed to evaluate the safety of gallbladder retrieval without the use of a retrieval device. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted across two teaching hospitals in the Republic of Ireland from July 2010–2013. Patients undergoing planed elective day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the two institutions were included in the study. Data were collected on patient demographics, the use of a bag, any need for extension of fascial incision, any unexpected over night stay, any 30-day post operative complications and presence of port site hernia within 1 year surgery. RESULTS: There were 373 planned elective day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed during the study period. A bag was not used to retrieve the gallbladder in 41 % (n = 152) patients. A retrieval bag was used in the majority of patients (71 %) who required over night stay due to pain. Overall wound infection rate was low (2.4 %), with 57 % of those being in patients where no retrieval bag was used. An increase incision in the fascia was required in 9.7 % of patients. The majority of these were in patients in whom a retrieval bag was used (75 %). At 1 year follow up, there were no recorded cases of port site hernia for the no retrieval bag group and two (0.9 %) cases of umbilical port site hernias in the group where retrieval bag was used. CONCLUSION: In cases of elective uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy for radiologically confirmed benign disease there was no benefit in using a retrieval bag. Furthermore, not using a bag was associated with less need for increasing the size of the fascial incision thereby reducing post operative pain and risk of port site hernia. BioMed Central 2016-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5028946/ /pubmed/27643488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-016-0181-y Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Majid, Muhamed Hamid
Meshkat, Babak
Kohar, Haseeb
El Masry, Sherif
Specimen retrieval during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it safe not to use a retrieval bag?
title Specimen retrieval during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it safe not to use a retrieval bag?
title_full Specimen retrieval during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it safe not to use a retrieval bag?
title_fullStr Specimen retrieval during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it safe not to use a retrieval bag?
title_full_unstemmed Specimen retrieval during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it safe not to use a retrieval bag?
title_short Specimen retrieval during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it safe not to use a retrieval bag?
title_sort specimen retrieval during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it safe not to use a retrieval bag?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5028946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27643488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-016-0181-y
work_keys_str_mv AT majidmuhamedhamid specimenretrievalduringelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomyisitsafenottousearetrievalbag
AT meshkatbabak specimenretrievalduringelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomyisitsafenottousearetrievalbag
AT koharhaseeb specimenretrievalduringelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomyisitsafenottousearetrievalbag
AT elmasrysherif specimenretrievalduringelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomyisitsafenottousearetrievalbag