Cargando…

Efficacy of a fixed combination of 0.09 % xanthan gum/0.1 % chondroitin sulfate preservative free vs polyethylene glycol/propylene glycol in subjects with dry eye disease: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Dry eye disease (DED) is multifactorial, affecting 5–34 % of the global adult population and reducing quality of life. The artificial tears or lubricants are the therapy most used for the treatment of DED, due to their low side effect profile, which attempt to modify the properties of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pérez-Balbuena, Ana L., Ochoa-Tabares, Juan C., Belalcazar-Rey, Sandra, Urzúa-Salinas, Cristian, Saucedo-Rodríguez, Laura R., Velasco-Ramos, Regina, Suárez-Sánchez, Raúl G., Rodríguez-Carrizalez, Adolfo D., Oregón-Miranda, Aldo A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5028962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27645318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0343-9
_version_ 1782454433404157952
author Pérez-Balbuena, Ana L.
Ochoa-Tabares, Juan C.
Belalcazar-Rey, Sandra
Urzúa-Salinas, Cristian
Saucedo-Rodríguez, Laura R.
Velasco-Ramos, Regina
Suárez-Sánchez, Raúl G.
Rodríguez-Carrizalez, Adolfo D.
Oregón-Miranda, Aldo A.
author_facet Pérez-Balbuena, Ana L.
Ochoa-Tabares, Juan C.
Belalcazar-Rey, Sandra
Urzúa-Salinas, Cristian
Saucedo-Rodríguez, Laura R.
Velasco-Ramos, Regina
Suárez-Sánchez, Raúl G.
Rodríguez-Carrizalez, Adolfo D.
Oregón-Miranda, Aldo A.
author_sort Pérez-Balbuena, Ana L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dry eye disease (DED) is multifactorial, affecting 5–34 % of the global adult population and reducing quality of life. The artificial tears or lubricants are the therapy most used for the treatment of DED, due to their low side effect profile, which attempt to modify the properties of the tear film. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a fixed combination of xanthan gum and chondroitin sulfate preservative free on the ocular surface of patients with dry eye disease during 60 days of intervention. METHODS: A phase III, double-blind, masked, controlled, multicenter, clinical trial of 148 subjects, randomized to either a fixed combination of xanthan gum 0.09 % and chondroitin sulfate 0.1 % (XG/CS) ophthalmic solution (n = 76) or a fixed combination of polyethylene glycol 400 0.4 % and propylene glycol 0.3 % (PEG/PG) (n = 72). Subjects self-dosed four times daily during 60 days. Follow-up was set on days 2, 7, 15, 30 and 60. Assessments of anterior/posterior segment ocular signs were performed. The outcome measures included Schirmer test, tear film break-up time and OSDI score. Security variables included intraocular pressure, lisamine green and fluorescein ocular surface stains. RESULTS: The primary efficacy endpoints were similar between groups at baseline. After intervention time Schirmer test increased in both groups compared to baseline, XG/CS (6.4 ± 2.2 vs 11.0 ± 6.6; p = 0.002) and PEG/PG (6.5 ± 2.5 vs 10.5 ± 5.6; p = 0.019) respectively. Similar results were reported in the tear film break-up time in XG/CS (5.5 ± 2.1 vs 7.4 ± 2.9; p = 0.027) and PEG/PG (5.2 ± 2.0 vs 7.4 ± 2.7; p = 0.046) respectively. The OSDI score decreased to normal values in both groups, XG/CS (19.3 ± 7.4 vs 7.3 ± 5.9; p = 0.001) and PEG/PG (19.3 ± 7.5 vs 7.9 ± 8.2; p = 0.001) respectively. There was no significant difference between treatments for any parameter. Moreover, both groups decreased the presence of burning sensation, tearing, foreign body sensation, conjunctival hyperemia and photophobia. The adverse events were not related to the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Xanthan gum/chondroitin sulfate preservative free showed similar clinical efficacy, evaluated with OSDI score, TBUT and Schirmer test compared to polyethylene glycol/propylene glycol in the treatment of dry eye disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01657253. Date of registration May 19, 2014.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5028962
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50289622016-09-22 Efficacy of a fixed combination of 0.09 % xanthan gum/0.1 % chondroitin sulfate preservative free vs polyethylene glycol/propylene glycol in subjects with dry eye disease: a multicenter randomized controlled trial Pérez-Balbuena, Ana L. Ochoa-Tabares, Juan C. Belalcazar-Rey, Sandra Urzúa-Salinas, Cristian Saucedo-Rodríguez, Laura R. Velasco-Ramos, Regina Suárez-Sánchez, Raúl G. Rodríguez-Carrizalez, Adolfo D. Oregón-Miranda, Aldo A. BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: Dry eye disease (DED) is multifactorial, affecting 5–34 % of the global adult population and reducing quality of life. The artificial tears or lubricants are the therapy most used for the treatment of DED, due to their low side effect profile, which attempt to modify the properties of the tear film. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a fixed combination of xanthan gum and chondroitin sulfate preservative free on the ocular surface of patients with dry eye disease during 60 days of intervention. METHODS: A phase III, double-blind, masked, controlled, multicenter, clinical trial of 148 subjects, randomized to either a fixed combination of xanthan gum 0.09 % and chondroitin sulfate 0.1 % (XG/CS) ophthalmic solution (n = 76) or a fixed combination of polyethylene glycol 400 0.4 % and propylene glycol 0.3 % (PEG/PG) (n = 72). Subjects self-dosed four times daily during 60 days. Follow-up was set on days 2, 7, 15, 30 and 60. Assessments of anterior/posterior segment ocular signs were performed. The outcome measures included Schirmer test, tear film break-up time and OSDI score. Security variables included intraocular pressure, lisamine green and fluorescein ocular surface stains. RESULTS: The primary efficacy endpoints were similar between groups at baseline. After intervention time Schirmer test increased in both groups compared to baseline, XG/CS (6.4 ± 2.2 vs 11.0 ± 6.6; p = 0.002) and PEG/PG (6.5 ± 2.5 vs 10.5 ± 5.6; p = 0.019) respectively. Similar results were reported in the tear film break-up time in XG/CS (5.5 ± 2.1 vs 7.4 ± 2.9; p = 0.027) and PEG/PG (5.2 ± 2.0 vs 7.4 ± 2.7; p = 0.046) respectively. The OSDI score decreased to normal values in both groups, XG/CS (19.3 ± 7.4 vs 7.3 ± 5.9; p = 0.001) and PEG/PG (19.3 ± 7.5 vs 7.9 ± 8.2; p = 0.001) respectively. There was no significant difference between treatments for any parameter. Moreover, both groups decreased the presence of burning sensation, tearing, foreign body sensation, conjunctival hyperemia and photophobia. The adverse events were not related to the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Xanthan gum/chondroitin sulfate preservative free showed similar clinical efficacy, evaluated with OSDI score, TBUT and Schirmer test compared to polyethylene glycol/propylene glycol in the treatment of dry eye disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01657253. Date of registration May 19, 2014. BioMed Central 2016-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5028962/ /pubmed/27645318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0343-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pérez-Balbuena, Ana L.
Ochoa-Tabares, Juan C.
Belalcazar-Rey, Sandra
Urzúa-Salinas, Cristian
Saucedo-Rodríguez, Laura R.
Velasco-Ramos, Regina
Suárez-Sánchez, Raúl G.
Rodríguez-Carrizalez, Adolfo D.
Oregón-Miranda, Aldo A.
Efficacy of a fixed combination of 0.09 % xanthan gum/0.1 % chondroitin sulfate preservative free vs polyethylene glycol/propylene glycol in subjects with dry eye disease: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
title Efficacy of a fixed combination of 0.09 % xanthan gum/0.1 % chondroitin sulfate preservative free vs polyethylene glycol/propylene glycol in subjects with dry eye disease: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_full Efficacy of a fixed combination of 0.09 % xanthan gum/0.1 % chondroitin sulfate preservative free vs polyethylene glycol/propylene glycol in subjects with dry eye disease: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of a fixed combination of 0.09 % xanthan gum/0.1 % chondroitin sulfate preservative free vs polyethylene glycol/propylene glycol in subjects with dry eye disease: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of a fixed combination of 0.09 % xanthan gum/0.1 % chondroitin sulfate preservative free vs polyethylene glycol/propylene glycol in subjects with dry eye disease: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_short Efficacy of a fixed combination of 0.09 % xanthan gum/0.1 % chondroitin sulfate preservative free vs polyethylene glycol/propylene glycol in subjects with dry eye disease: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of a fixed combination of 0.09 % xanthan gum/0.1 % chondroitin sulfate preservative free vs polyethylene glycol/propylene glycol in subjects with dry eye disease: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5028962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27645318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0343-9
work_keys_str_mv AT perezbalbuenaanal efficacyofafixedcombinationof009xanthangum01chondroitinsulfatepreservativefreevspolyethyleneglycolpropyleneglycolinsubjectswithdryeyediseaseamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ochoatabaresjuanc efficacyofafixedcombinationof009xanthangum01chondroitinsulfatepreservativefreevspolyethyleneglycolpropyleneglycolinsubjectswithdryeyediseaseamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT belalcazarreysandra efficacyofafixedcombinationof009xanthangum01chondroitinsulfatepreservativefreevspolyethyleneglycolpropyleneglycolinsubjectswithdryeyediseaseamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT urzuasalinascristian efficacyofafixedcombinationof009xanthangum01chondroitinsulfatepreservativefreevspolyethyleneglycolpropyleneglycolinsubjectswithdryeyediseaseamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT saucedorodriguezlaurar efficacyofafixedcombinationof009xanthangum01chondroitinsulfatepreservativefreevspolyethyleneglycolpropyleneglycolinsubjectswithdryeyediseaseamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT velascoramosregina efficacyofafixedcombinationof009xanthangum01chondroitinsulfatepreservativefreevspolyethyleneglycolpropyleneglycolinsubjectswithdryeyediseaseamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT suarezsanchezraulg efficacyofafixedcombinationof009xanthangum01chondroitinsulfatepreservativefreevspolyethyleneglycolpropyleneglycolinsubjectswithdryeyediseaseamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rodriguezcarrizalezadolfod efficacyofafixedcombinationof009xanthangum01chondroitinsulfatepreservativefreevspolyethyleneglycolpropyleneglycolinsubjectswithdryeyediseaseamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT oregonmirandaaldoa efficacyofafixedcombinationof009xanthangum01chondroitinsulfatepreservativefreevspolyethyleneglycolpropyleneglycolinsubjectswithdryeyediseaseamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial