Cargando…

Robotic vs laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective comparative mono-institutional study

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery has been developed with the aim of improving surgical quality and overcoming the limitations of conventional laparoscopy in the performance of complex mini-invasive procedures. The present study was designed to compare robotic and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy in the tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cianchi, Fabio, Indennitate, Giampiero, Trallori, Giacomo, Ortolani, Manuela, Paoli, Beatrice, Macrì, Giuseppe, Lami, Gabriele, Mallardi, Beatrice, Badii, Benedetta, Staderini, Fabio, Qirici, Etleva, Taddei, Antonio, Ringressi, Maria Novella, Messerini, Luca, Novelli, Luca, Bagnoli, Siro, Bonanomi, Andrea, Foppa, Caterina, Skalamera, Ileana, Fiorenza, Giulia, Perigli, Giuliano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5029040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27646414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-016-0180-z
_version_ 1782454451462733824
author Cianchi, Fabio
Indennitate, Giampiero
Trallori, Giacomo
Ortolani, Manuela
Paoli, Beatrice
Macrì, Giuseppe
Lami, Gabriele
Mallardi, Beatrice
Badii, Benedetta
Staderini, Fabio
Qirici, Etleva
Taddei, Antonio
Ringressi, Maria Novella
Messerini, Luca
Novelli, Luca
Bagnoli, Siro
Bonanomi, Andrea
Foppa, Caterina
Skalamera, Ileana
Fiorenza, Giulia
Perigli, Giuliano
author_facet Cianchi, Fabio
Indennitate, Giampiero
Trallori, Giacomo
Ortolani, Manuela
Paoli, Beatrice
Macrì, Giuseppe
Lami, Gabriele
Mallardi, Beatrice
Badii, Benedetta
Staderini, Fabio
Qirici, Etleva
Taddei, Antonio
Ringressi, Maria Novella
Messerini, Luca
Novelli, Luca
Bagnoli, Siro
Bonanomi, Andrea
Foppa, Caterina
Skalamera, Ileana
Fiorenza, Giulia
Perigli, Giuliano
author_sort Cianchi, Fabio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery has been developed with the aim of improving surgical quality and overcoming the limitations of conventional laparoscopy in the performance of complex mini-invasive procedures. The present study was designed to compare robotic and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer. METHODS: Between June 2008 and September 2015, 41 laparoscopic and 30 robotic distal gastrectomies were performed by a single surgeon at the same institution. Clinicopathological characteristics of the patients, surgical performance, postoperative morbidity/mortality and pathologic data were prospectively collected and compared between the laparoscopic and robotic groups by the Chi-square test and the Mann-Whitney test, as indicated. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the two groups. Mean tumor size was larger in the laparoscopic than in the robotic patients (5.3 ± 0.5 cm and 3.0 ± 0.4 cm, respectively; P = 0.02). However, tumor stage distribution was similar between the two groups. The mean number of dissected lymph nodes was higher in the robotic than in the laparoscopic patients (39.1 ± 3.7 and 30.5 ± 2.0, respectively; P = 0.02). The mean operative time was 262.6 ± 8.6 min in the laparoscopic group and 312.6 ± 15.7 min in the robotic group (P < 0.001). The incidences of surgery-related and surgery-unrelated complications were similar in the laparoscopic and in the robotic patients. There were no significant differences in short-term clinical outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitation of a small-sized, non-randomized analysis, our study confirms that robotic distal gastrectomy is a feasible and safe surgical procedure. When compared with conventional laparoscopy, robotic surgery shows evident benefits in the performance of lymphadenectomy with a higher number of retrieved and examined lymph nodes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5029040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50290402016-09-22 Robotic vs laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective comparative mono-institutional study Cianchi, Fabio Indennitate, Giampiero Trallori, Giacomo Ortolani, Manuela Paoli, Beatrice Macrì, Giuseppe Lami, Gabriele Mallardi, Beatrice Badii, Benedetta Staderini, Fabio Qirici, Etleva Taddei, Antonio Ringressi, Maria Novella Messerini, Luca Novelli, Luca Bagnoli, Siro Bonanomi, Andrea Foppa, Caterina Skalamera, Ileana Fiorenza, Giulia Perigli, Giuliano BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery has been developed with the aim of improving surgical quality and overcoming the limitations of conventional laparoscopy in the performance of complex mini-invasive procedures. The present study was designed to compare robotic and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer. METHODS: Between June 2008 and September 2015, 41 laparoscopic and 30 robotic distal gastrectomies were performed by a single surgeon at the same institution. Clinicopathological characteristics of the patients, surgical performance, postoperative morbidity/mortality and pathologic data were prospectively collected and compared between the laparoscopic and robotic groups by the Chi-square test and the Mann-Whitney test, as indicated. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the two groups. Mean tumor size was larger in the laparoscopic than in the robotic patients (5.3 ± 0.5 cm and 3.0 ± 0.4 cm, respectively; P = 0.02). However, tumor stage distribution was similar between the two groups. The mean number of dissected lymph nodes was higher in the robotic than in the laparoscopic patients (39.1 ± 3.7 and 30.5 ± 2.0, respectively; P = 0.02). The mean operative time was 262.6 ± 8.6 min in the laparoscopic group and 312.6 ± 15.7 min in the robotic group (P < 0.001). The incidences of surgery-related and surgery-unrelated complications were similar in the laparoscopic and in the robotic patients. There were no significant differences in short-term clinical outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitation of a small-sized, non-randomized analysis, our study confirms that robotic distal gastrectomy is a feasible and safe surgical procedure. When compared with conventional laparoscopy, robotic surgery shows evident benefits in the performance of lymphadenectomy with a higher number of retrieved and examined lymph nodes. BioMed Central 2016-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5029040/ /pubmed/27646414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-016-0180-z Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cianchi, Fabio
Indennitate, Giampiero
Trallori, Giacomo
Ortolani, Manuela
Paoli, Beatrice
Macrì, Giuseppe
Lami, Gabriele
Mallardi, Beatrice
Badii, Benedetta
Staderini, Fabio
Qirici, Etleva
Taddei, Antonio
Ringressi, Maria Novella
Messerini, Luca
Novelli, Luca
Bagnoli, Siro
Bonanomi, Andrea
Foppa, Caterina
Skalamera, Ileana
Fiorenza, Giulia
Perigli, Giuliano
Robotic vs laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective comparative mono-institutional study
title Robotic vs laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective comparative mono-institutional study
title_full Robotic vs laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective comparative mono-institutional study
title_fullStr Robotic vs laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective comparative mono-institutional study
title_full_unstemmed Robotic vs laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective comparative mono-institutional study
title_short Robotic vs laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective comparative mono-institutional study
title_sort robotic vs laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with d2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective comparative mono-institutional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5029040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27646414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-016-0180-z
work_keys_str_mv AT cianchifabio roboticvslaparoscopicdistalgastrectomywithd2lymphadenectomyforgastriccanceraretrospectivecomparativemonoinstitutionalstudy
AT indennitategiampiero roboticvslaparoscopicdistalgastrectomywithd2lymphadenectomyforgastriccanceraretrospectivecomparativemonoinstitutionalstudy
AT trallorigiacomo roboticvslaparoscopicdistalgastrectomywithd2lymphadenectomyforgastriccanceraretrospectivecomparativemonoinstitutionalstudy
AT ortolanimanuela roboticvslaparoscopicdistalgastrectomywithd2lymphadenectomyforgastriccanceraretrospectivecomparativemonoinstitutionalstudy
AT paolibeatrice roboticvslaparoscopicdistalgastrectomywithd2lymphadenectomyforgastriccanceraretrospectivecomparativemonoinstitutionalstudy
AT macrigiuseppe roboticvslaparoscopicdistalgastrectomywithd2lymphadenectomyforgastriccanceraretrospectivecomparativemonoinstitutionalstudy
AT lamigabriele roboticvslaparoscopicdistalgastrectomywithd2lymphadenectomyforgastriccanceraretrospectivecomparativemonoinstitutionalstudy
AT mallardibeatrice roboticvslaparoscopicdistalgastrectomywithd2lymphadenectomyforgastriccanceraretrospectivecomparativemonoinstitutionalstudy
AT badiibenedetta roboticvslaparoscopicdistalgastrectomywithd2lymphadenectomyforgastriccanceraretrospectivecomparativemonoinstitutionalstudy
AT staderinifabio roboticvslaparoscopicdistalgastrectomywithd2lymphadenectomyforgastriccanceraretrospectivecomparativemonoinstitutionalstudy
AT qiricietleva roboticvslaparoscopicdistalgastrectomywithd2lymphadenectomyforgastriccanceraretrospectivecomparativemonoinstitutionalstudy
AT taddeiantonio roboticvslaparoscopicdistalgastrectomywithd2lymphadenectomyforgastriccanceraretrospectivecomparativemonoinstitutionalstudy
AT ringressimarianovella roboticvslaparoscopicdistalgastrectomywithd2lymphadenectomyforgastriccanceraretrospectivecomparativemonoinstitutionalstudy
AT messeriniluca roboticvslaparoscopicdistalgastrectomywithd2lymphadenectomyforgastriccanceraretrospectivecomparativemonoinstitutionalstudy
AT novelliluca roboticvslaparoscopicdistalgastrectomywithd2lymphadenectomyforgastriccanceraretrospectivecomparativemonoinstitutionalstudy
AT bagnolisiro roboticvslaparoscopicdistalgastrectomywithd2lymphadenectomyforgastriccanceraretrospectivecomparativemonoinstitutionalstudy
AT bonanomiandrea roboticvslaparoscopicdistalgastrectomywithd2lymphadenectomyforgastriccanceraretrospectivecomparativemonoinstitutionalstudy
AT foppacaterina roboticvslaparoscopicdistalgastrectomywithd2lymphadenectomyforgastriccanceraretrospectivecomparativemonoinstitutionalstudy
AT skalameraileana roboticvslaparoscopicdistalgastrectomywithd2lymphadenectomyforgastriccanceraretrospectivecomparativemonoinstitutionalstudy
AT fiorenzagiulia roboticvslaparoscopicdistalgastrectomywithd2lymphadenectomyforgastriccanceraretrospectivecomparativemonoinstitutionalstudy
AT perigligiuliano roboticvslaparoscopicdistalgastrectomywithd2lymphadenectomyforgastriccanceraretrospectivecomparativemonoinstitutionalstudy