Cargando…

Measuring safety climate in acute hospitals: Rasch analysis of the safety attitudes questionnaire

BACKGROUND: The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) is commonly used to assess staff perception of safety climate within their clinical environment. The psychometric properties of the SAQ have previously been explored with confirmatory factor analysis and found to have some issues with construct va...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soh, Sze-Ee, Barker, Anna, Morello, Renata, Dalton, Megan, Brand, Caroline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5029072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27644437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1744-4
_version_ 1782454458420035584
author Soh, Sze-Ee
Barker, Anna
Morello, Renata
Dalton, Megan
Brand, Caroline
author_facet Soh, Sze-Ee
Barker, Anna
Morello, Renata
Dalton, Megan
Brand, Caroline
author_sort Soh, Sze-Ee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) is commonly used to assess staff perception of safety climate within their clinical environment. The psychometric properties of the SAQ have previously been explored with confirmatory factor analysis and found to have some issues with construct validity. This study aimed to extend the psychometric evaluations of the SAQ by using Rasch analysis. METHODS: Assessment of internal construct validity included overall fit to the Rasch model (unidimensionality), response formats, targeting, differential item functioning (DIF) and person-separation index (PSI). RESULTS: A total of 420 nurses completed the SAQ (response rate 60 %). Data showed overall fit to a Rasch model of expected item functioning for interval scale measurement. The questionnaire demonstrated unidimensionality confirming the appropriateness of summing the items in each domain. Score reliabilities were appropriate (internal consistency PSI 0.6–0.8). However, participants were not using the response options on the SAQ in a consistent manner. All domains demonstrated suboptimal targeting and showed compromised score precision towards higher levels of safety climate (substantial ceiling effects). CONCLUSION: There was general support for the reliability of the SAQ as a measure of safety climate although it may not be able to detect small but clinically important changes in safety climate within an organisation. Further refinement of the SAQ is warranted. This may involve changing the response options and including new items to improve the overall targeting of the scale. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12611000332921 (21 March 2011). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1744-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5029072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50290722016-09-27 Measuring safety climate in acute hospitals: Rasch analysis of the safety attitudes questionnaire Soh, Sze-Ee Barker, Anna Morello, Renata Dalton, Megan Brand, Caroline BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) is commonly used to assess staff perception of safety climate within their clinical environment. The psychometric properties of the SAQ have previously been explored with confirmatory factor analysis and found to have some issues with construct validity. This study aimed to extend the psychometric evaluations of the SAQ by using Rasch analysis. METHODS: Assessment of internal construct validity included overall fit to the Rasch model (unidimensionality), response formats, targeting, differential item functioning (DIF) and person-separation index (PSI). RESULTS: A total of 420 nurses completed the SAQ (response rate 60 %). Data showed overall fit to a Rasch model of expected item functioning for interval scale measurement. The questionnaire demonstrated unidimensionality confirming the appropriateness of summing the items in each domain. Score reliabilities were appropriate (internal consistency PSI 0.6–0.8). However, participants were not using the response options on the SAQ in a consistent manner. All domains demonstrated suboptimal targeting and showed compromised score precision towards higher levels of safety climate (substantial ceiling effects). CONCLUSION: There was general support for the reliability of the SAQ as a measure of safety climate although it may not be able to detect small but clinically important changes in safety climate within an organisation. Further refinement of the SAQ is warranted. This may involve changing the response options and including new items to improve the overall targeting of the scale. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12611000332921 (21 March 2011). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1744-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5029072/ /pubmed/27644437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1744-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Soh, Sze-Ee
Barker, Anna
Morello, Renata
Dalton, Megan
Brand, Caroline
Measuring safety climate in acute hospitals: Rasch analysis of the safety attitudes questionnaire
title Measuring safety climate in acute hospitals: Rasch analysis of the safety attitudes questionnaire
title_full Measuring safety climate in acute hospitals: Rasch analysis of the safety attitudes questionnaire
title_fullStr Measuring safety climate in acute hospitals: Rasch analysis of the safety attitudes questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Measuring safety climate in acute hospitals: Rasch analysis of the safety attitudes questionnaire
title_short Measuring safety climate in acute hospitals: Rasch analysis of the safety attitudes questionnaire
title_sort measuring safety climate in acute hospitals: rasch analysis of the safety attitudes questionnaire
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5029072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27644437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1744-4
work_keys_str_mv AT sohszeee measuringsafetyclimateinacutehospitalsraschanalysisofthesafetyattitudesquestionnaire
AT barkeranna measuringsafetyclimateinacutehospitalsraschanalysisofthesafetyattitudesquestionnaire
AT morellorenata measuringsafetyclimateinacutehospitalsraschanalysisofthesafetyattitudesquestionnaire
AT daltonmegan measuringsafetyclimateinacutehospitalsraschanalysisofthesafetyattitudesquestionnaire
AT brandcaroline measuringsafetyclimateinacutehospitalsraschanalysisofthesafetyattitudesquestionnaire