Cargando…

Cell fate determination in cisplatin resistance and chemosensitization

Understanding the determination of cell fate choices after cancer treatment will shed new light on cancer resistance. In this study, we quantitatively analyzed the individual cell fate choice in resistant UM-SCC-38 head and neck cancer cells exposed to cisplatin. Our study revealed a highly heteroge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luong, Khanh V., Wang, Ling, Roberts, Brett J., Wahl, James K., Peng, Aimin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5029634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26993599
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8110
_version_ 1782454545885954048
author Luong, Khanh V.
Wang, Ling
Roberts, Brett J.
Wahl, James K.
Peng, Aimin
author_facet Luong, Khanh V.
Wang, Ling
Roberts, Brett J.
Wahl, James K.
Peng, Aimin
author_sort Luong, Khanh V.
collection PubMed
description Understanding the determination of cell fate choices after cancer treatment will shed new light on cancer resistance. In this study, we quantitatively analyzed the individual cell fate choice in resistant UM-SCC-38 head and neck cancer cells exposed to cisplatin. Our study revealed a highly heterogeneous pattern of cell fate choices in UM-SCC-38 cells, in comparison to that of the control, non-tumorigenic keratinocyte HaCaT cells. In both UM-SCC-38 and HaCaT cell lines, the majority of cell death occurred during the immediate interphase without mitotic entry, whereas significant portions of UM-SCC-38 cells survived the treatment via either checkpoint arrest or checkpoint slippage. Interestingly, checkpoint slippage occurred predominantly in cells treated in late S and G2 phases, and cells in M-phase were hypersensitive to cisplatin. Moreover, although the cisplatin-resistant progression of mitosis exhibited no delay in general, prolonged mitosis was correlated with the induction of cell death in mitosis. The finding thus suggested a combinatorial treatment using cisplatin and an agent that blocks mitotic exit. Consistently, we showed a strong synergy between cisplatin and the proteasome inhibitor Mg132. Finally, targeting the DNA damage checkpoint using inhibitors of ATR, but not ATM, effectively sensitized UM-SCC-38 to cisplatin treatment. Surprisingly, checkpoint targeting eliminated both checkpoint arrest and checkpoint slippage, and augmented the induction of cell death in interphase without mitotic entry. Taken together, our study, by profiling cell fate determination after cisplatin treatment, reveals new insights into chemoresistance and suggests combinatorial strategies that potentially overcome cancer resistance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5029634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50296342016-09-29 Cell fate determination in cisplatin resistance and chemosensitization Luong, Khanh V. Wang, Ling Roberts, Brett J. Wahl, James K. Peng, Aimin Oncotarget Research Paper Understanding the determination of cell fate choices after cancer treatment will shed new light on cancer resistance. In this study, we quantitatively analyzed the individual cell fate choice in resistant UM-SCC-38 head and neck cancer cells exposed to cisplatin. Our study revealed a highly heterogeneous pattern of cell fate choices in UM-SCC-38 cells, in comparison to that of the control, non-tumorigenic keratinocyte HaCaT cells. In both UM-SCC-38 and HaCaT cell lines, the majority of cell death occurred during the immediate interphase without mitotic entry, whereas significant portions of UM-SCC-38 cells survived the treatment via either checkpoint arrest or checkpoint slippage. Interestingly, checkpoint slippage occurred predominantly in cells treated in late S and G2 phases, and cells in M-phase were hypersensitive to cisplatin. Moreover, although the cisplatin-resistant progression of mitosis exhibited no delay in general, prolonged mitosis was correlated with the induction of cell death in mitosis. The finding thus suggested a combinatorial treatment using cisplatin and an agent that blocks mitotic exit. Consistently, we showed a strong synergy between cisplatin and the proteasome inhibitor Mg132. Finally, targeting the DNA damage checkpoint using inhibitors of ATR, but not ATM, effectively sensitized UM-SCC-38 to cisplatin treatment. Surprisingly, checkpoint targeting eliminated both checkpoint arrest and checkpoint slippage, and augmented the induction of cell death in interphase without mitotic entry. Taken together, our study, by profiling cell fate determination after cisplatin treatment, reveals new insights into chemoresistance and suggests combinatorial strategies that potentially overcome cancer resistance. Impact Journals LLC 2016-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5029634/ /pubmed/26993599 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8110 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Luong et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Luong, Khanh V.
Wang, Ling
Roberts, Brett J.
Wahl, James K.
Peng, Aimin
Cell fate determination in cisplatin resistance and chemosensitization
title Cell fate determination in cisplatin resistance and chemosensitization
title_full Cell fate determination in cisplatin resistance and chemosensitization
title_fullStr Cell fate determination in cisplatin resistance and chemosensitization
title_full_unstemmed Cell fate determination in cisplatin resistance and chemosensitization
title_short Cell fate determination in cisplatin resistance and chemosensitization
title_sort cell fate determination in cisplatin resistance and chemosensitization
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5029634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26993599
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8110
work_keys_str_mv AT luongkhanhv cellfatedeterminationincisplatinresistanceandchemosensitization
AT wangling cellfatedeterminationincisplatinresistanceandchemosensitization
AT robertsbrettj cellfatedeterminationincisplatinresistanceandchemosensitization
AT wahljamesk cellfatedeterminationincisplatinresistanceandchemosensitization
AT pengaimin cellfatedeterminationincisplatinresistanceandchemosensitization