Cargando…

Heterotopic pregnancy: a report of two cases

Background: A heterotopic pregnancy is defined as the presence of a concomitant intrauterine and extrauterine pregnancy. Its estimated incidence is 1/30,000 in spontaneous pregnancies. It is also reported to be as high as 1 in 3900 when the pregnancy is a result of assisted reproductive technology (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farnaghi, Soheil, Kothari, Alka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5029978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28191170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2205-0140.2013.tb00095.x
_version_ 1782454614138814464
author Farnaghi, Soheil
Kothari, Alka
author_facet Farnaghi, Soheil
Kothari, Alka
author_sort Farnaghi, Soheil
collection PubMed
description Background: A heterotopic pregnancy is defined as the presence of a concomitant intrauterine and extrauterine pregnancy. Its estimated incidence is 1/30,000 in spontaneous pregnancies. It is also reported to be as high as 1 in 3900 when the pregnancy is a result of assisted reproductive technology (ART). However, clomiphene citrate (CC) could be associated with a higher rate of heterotopic pregnancy as it amplifies the rate of twinning. Furthermore, heterotopic pregnancies are a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for obstetricians. If undiagnosed, they are associated with significant maternal morbidity and mortality. Case presentation: We present two cases of coincidental intra and extra‐uterine pregnancy. In the first case, heterotopic pregnancy was a result of induction of ovulation with CC. There was a delay in the diagnosis of the ectopic pregnancy component resulting in an emergency laparoscopy. Fortunately, after the laparoscopy the intrauterine pregnancy was not affected and it is progressing satisfactorily. Alternatively, the second case occurred spontaneously and was treated with methotrexate as the intrauterine pregnancy miscarried on its own accord. Conclusions: These cases highlight the fact that as clinicians, we should be aware of the possibility of a heterotopic pregnancy in any patient presenting with pelvic pain, even when an intrauterine pregnancy has been confirmed. This is even more imperative after induction of ovulation by CC or ART. We would also like to emphasise that an early diagnosis is critical to safeguard the intrauterine pregnancy and avoid maternal morbidity and mortality due to the ectopic pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5029978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50299782017-02-10 Heterotopic pregnancy: a report of two cases Farnaghi, Soheil Kothari, Alka Australas J Ultrasound Med Case Study Background: A heterotopic pregnancy is defined as the presence of a concomitant intrauterine and extrauterine pregnancy. Its estimated incidence is 1/30,000 in spontaneous pregnancies. It is also reported to be as high as 1 in 3900 when the pregnancy is a result of assisted reproductive technology (ART). However, clomiphene citrate (CC) could be associated with a higher rate of heterotopic pregnancy as it amplifies the rate of twinning. Furthermore, heterotopic pregnancies are a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for obstetricians. If undiagnosed, they are associated with significant maternal morbidity and mortality. Case presentation: We present two cases of coincidental intra and extra‐uterine pregnancy. In the first case, heterotopic pregnancy was a result of induction of ovulation with CC. There was a delay in the diagnosis of the ectopic pregnancy component resulting in an emergency laparoscopy. Fortunately, after the laparoscopy the intrauterine pregnancy was not affected and it is progressing satisfactorily. Alternatively, the second case occurred spontaneously and was treated with methotrexate as the intrauterine pregnancy miscarried on its own accord. Conclusions: These cases highlight the fact that as clinicians, we should be aware of the possibility of a heterotopic pregnancy in any patient presenting with pelvic pain, even when an intrauterine pregnancy has been confirmed. This is even more imperative after induction of ovulation by CC or ART. We would also like to emphasise that an early diagnosis is critical to safeguard the intrauterine pregnancy and avoid maternal morbidity and mortality due to the ectopic pregnancy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-12-31 2013-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5029978/ /pubmed/28191170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2205-0140.2013.tb00095.x Text en © 2013 Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine
spellingShingle Case Study
Farnaghi, Soheil
Kothari, Alka
Heterotopic pregnancy: a report of two cases
title Heterotopic pregnancy: a report of two cases
title_full Heterotopic pregnancy: a report of two cases
title_fullStr Heterotopic pregnancy: a report of two cases
title_full_unstemmed Heterotopic pregnancy: a report of two cases
title_short Heterotopic pregnancy: a report of two cases
title_sort heterotopic pregnancy: a report of two cases
topic Case Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5029978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28191170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2205-0140.2013.tb00095.x
work_keys_str_mv AT farnaghisoheil heterotopicpregnancyareportoftwocases
AT kotharialka heterotopicpregnancyareportoftwocases