Cargando…

Cervical length for predicting preterm birth and a comparison of ultrasonic measurement techniques

Introduction: Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality not attributable to congenital anomalies or aneuploidy. It has been shown that a shortened cervix is a powerful indicator of preterm births in women with singleton and twin gestations – the shorter the cervical leng...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Hara, Sandra, Zelesco, Marilyn, Sun, Zhonghua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5029998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28191186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2205-0140.2013.tb00100.x
_version_ 1782454618753597440
author O'Hara, Sandra
Zelesco, Marilyn
Sun, Zhonghua
author_facet O'Hara, Sandra
Zelesco, Marilyn
Sun, Zhonghua
author_sort O'Hara, Sandra
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality not attributable to congenital anomalies or aneuploidy. It has been shown that a shortened cervix is a powerful indicator of preterm births in women with singleton and twin gestations – the shorter the cervical length, the higher the risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Ultrasound measurements of the cervix are a more accurate way of determining cervical length (CL) than using a digital method. Background: There are three approaches that may be used to perform ultrasound measurements of the cervix; these are the transabdominal (TA), transperineal (TP) and the transvaginal (TV) approach. The TV approach is considered to be the gold standard. In women who are considered to be at a high risk of preterm birth it is now recommended that the cervix is measured at the mid‐trimester ultrasound using the TV ultrasound approach. For women considered to be at a historical low risk the TV scan is not recommended, however it has been found that many women who deliver a preterm baby have no known risk factors. Conclusion: There is contradictory evidence in the literature with regard to the correlation between TA, TP and TV measurements. This article provides an overview of these three approaches with a focus on the clinical value for the assessment of the maternal cervix.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5029998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50299982017-02-10 Cervical length for predicting preterm birth and a comparison of ultrasonic measurement techniques O'Hara, Sandra Zelesco, Marilyn Sun, Zhonghua Australas J Ultrasound Med Reviews Introduction: Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality not attributable to congenital anomalies or aneuploidy. It has been shown that a shortened cervix is a powerful indicator of preterm births in women with singleton and twin gestations – the shorter the cervical length, the higher the risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Ultrasound measurements of the cervix are a more accurate way of determining cervical length (CL) than using a digital method. Background: There are three approaches that may be used to perform ultrasound measurements of the cervix; these are the transabdominal (TA), transperineal (TP) and the transvaginal (TV) approach. The TV approach is considered to be the gold standard. In women who are considered to be at a high risk of preterm birth it is now recommended that the cervix is measured at the mid‐trimester ultrasound using the TV ultrasound approach. For women considered to be at a historical low risk the TV scan is not recommended, however it has been found that many women who deliver a preterm baby have no known risk factors. Conclusion: There is contradictory evidence in the literature with regard to the correlation between TA, TP and TV measurements. This article provides an overview of these three approaches with a focus on the clinical value for the assessment of the maternal cervix. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-12-31 2013-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5029998/ /pubmed/28191186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2205-0140.2013.tb00100.x Text en © 2013 Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine
spellingShingle Reviews
O'Hara, Sandra
Zelesco, Marilyn
Sun, Zhonghua
Cervical length for predicting preterm birth and a comparison of ultrasonic measurement techniques
title Cervical length for predicting preterm birth and a comparison of ultrasonic measurement techniques
title_full Cervical length for predicting preterm birth and a comparison of ultrasonic measurement techniques
title_fullStr Cervical length for predicting preterm birth and a comparison of ultrasonic measurement techniques
title_full_unstemmed Cervical length for predicting preterm birth and a comparison of ultrasonic measurement techniques
title_short Cervical length for predicting preterm birth and a comparison of ultrasonic measurement techniques
title_sort cervical length for predicting preterm birth and a comparison of ultrasonic measurement techniques
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5029998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28191186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2205-0140.2013.tb00100.x
work_keys_str_mv AT oharasandra cervicallengthforpredictingpretermbirthandacomparisonofultrasonicmeasurementtechniques
AT zelescomarilyn cervicallengthforpredictingpretermbirthandacomparisonofultrasonicmeasurementtechniques
AT sunzhonghua cervicallengthforpredictingpretermbirthandacomparisonofultrasonicmeasurementtechniques