Cargando…

Is bedside ultrasound now a routine part of specialist obstetrics and gynaecology outpatient consultation?

Introduction: Portable ultrasound is extensively used in the delivery suite, and there is anecdotal evidence that ultrasound is increasingly common in routine outpatient gynaecological practice. We could find no published data regarding the prevalence of ‘rooms’ ultrasound use in outpatient gynaecol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Der Wal, Sarah, Robson, Stephen J, Choong, Shawn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5030056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28191196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2205-0140.2013.tb00246.x
_version_ 1782454620828729344
author Van Der Wal, Sarah
Robson, Stephen J
Choong, Shawn
author_facet Van Der Wal, Sarah
Robson, Stephen J
Choong, Shawn
author_sort Van Der Wal, Sarah
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Portable ultrasound is extensively used in the delivery suite, and there is anecdotal evidence that ultrasound is increasingly common in routine outpatient gynaecological practice. We could find no published data regarding the prevalence of ‘rooms’ ultrasound use in outpatient gynaecology. Methods: A survey instrument was developed containing demographic questions about ‘rooms’ ultrasound use, and three clinical vignettes regarding dysmenorrhoea in a young woman, bleeding in early pregnancy, and postmenopausal bleeding. For each vignette, respondents were asked whether they would refer for ‘formal’ ultrasound or rely on their own findings. The anonymous questions were sent to every obstetrician/gynaecologist in private practice in Australia. Results: 438 surveys were posted and 242 returned (response rate 55%). 226 respondents (93.8%) reported using ultrasound in their consulting rooms, with 201 (88.9%) using transvaginal ultrasound. For the dysmenorrhoea vignette, 59% of respondents would rely on their own ultrasound findings and not refer for additional imaging. For the bleeding in early pregnancy vignette, 91% would rely on their own ultrasound findings and not refer for additional imaging. For post‐menopausal bleeding, 54% would rely on their own clinical and ultrasound findings and would not refer for additional imaging. Conclusion: The majority of practitioners would not refer for tertiary ultrasound if their own imaging revealed apparent normal findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5030056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50300562017-02-10 Is bedside ultrasound now a routine part of specialist obstetrics and gynaecology outpatient consultation? Van Der Wal, Sarah Robson, Stephen J Choong, Shawn Australas J Ultrasound Med Original Reserach Introduction: Portable ultrasound is extensively used in the delivery suite, and there is anecdotal evidence that ultrasound is increasingly common in routine outpatient gynaecological practice. We could find no published data regarding the prevalence of ‘rooms’ ultrasound use in outpatient gynaecology. Methods: A survey instrument was developed containing demographic questions about ‘rooms’ ultrasound use, and three clinical vignettes regarding dysmenorrhoea in a young woman, bleeding in early pregnancy, and postmenopausal bleeding. For each vignette, respondents were asked whether they would refer for ‘formal’ ultrasound or rely on their own findings. The anonymous questions were sent to every obstetrician/gynaecologist in private practice in Australia. Results: 438 surveys were posted and 242 returned (response rate 55%). 226 respondents (93.8%) reported using ultrasound in their consulting rooms, with 201 (88.9%) using transvaginal ultrasound. For the dysmenorrhoea vignette, 59% of respondents would rely on their own ultrasound findings and not refer for additional imaging. For the bleeding in early pregnancy vignette, 91% would rely on their own ultrasound findings and not refer for additional imaging. For post‐menopausal bleeding, 54% would rely on their own clinical and ultrasound findings and would not refer for additional imaging. Conclusion: The majority of practitioners would not refer for tertiary ultrasound if their own imaging revealed apparent normal findings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-12-31 2013-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5030056/ /pubmed/28191196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2205-0140.2013.tb00246.x Text en © 2013 Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine
spellingShingle Original Reserach
Van Der Wal, Sarah
Robson, Stephen J
Choong, Shawn
Is bedside ultrasound now a routine part of specialist obstetrics and gynaecology outpatient consultation?
title Is bedside ultrasound now a routine part of specialist obstetrics and gynaecology outpatient consultation?
title_full Is bedside ultrasound now a routine part of specialist obstetrics and gynaecology outpatient consultation?
title_fullStr Is bedside ultrasound now a routine part of specialist obstetrics and gynaecology outpatient consultation?
title_full_unstemmed Is bedside ultrasound now a routine part of specialist obstetrics and gynaecology outpatient consultation?
title_short Is bedside ultrasound now a routine part of specialist obstetrics and gynaecology outpatient consultation?
title_sort is bedside ultrasound now a routine part of specialist obstetrics and gynaecology outpatient consultation?
topic Original Reserach
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5030056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28191196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2205-0140.2013.tb00246.x
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderwalsarah isbedsideultrasoundnowaroutinepartofspecialistobstetricsandgynaecologyoutpatientconsultation
AT robsonstephenj isbedsideultrasoundnowaroutinepartofspecialistobstetricsandgynaecologyoutpatientconsultation
AT choongshawn isbedsideultrasoundnowaroutinepartofspecialistobstetricsandgynaecologyoutpatientconsultation