Cargando…

Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of invasive versus conservative management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax

INTRODUCTION: Current management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is variable, with little evidence from randomised controlled trials to guide treatment. Guidelines emphasise intervention in many patients, which involves chest drain insertion, hospital admission and occasionally surgery. Ho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Simon G A, Ball, Emma L, Perrin, Kyle, Read, Catherine A, Asha, Stephen E, Beasley, Richard, Egerton-Warburton, Diana, Jones, Peter G, Keijzers, Gerben, Kinnear, Frances B, Kwan, Ben C H, Lee, Y C Gary, Smith, Julian A, Summers, Quentin A, Simpson, Graham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5030537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27625060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011826
_version_ 1782454695980171264
author Brown, Simon G A
Ball, Emma L
Perrin, Kyle
Read, Catherine A
Asha, Stephen E
Beasley, Richard
Egerton-Warburton, Diana
Jones, Peter G
Keijzers, Gerben
Kinnear, Frances B
Kwan, Ben C H
Lee, Y C Gary
Smith, Julian A
Summers, Quentin A
Simpson, Graham
author_facet Brown, Simon G A
Ball, Emma L
Perrin, Kyle
Read, Catherine A
Asha, Stephen E
Beasley, Richard
Egerton-Warburton, Diana
Jones, Peter G
Keijzers, Gerben
Kinnear, Frances B
Kwan, Ben C H
Lee, Y C Gary
Smith, Julian A
Summers, Quentin A
Simpson, Graham
author_sort Brown, Simon G A
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Current management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is variable, with little evidence from randomised controlled trials to guide treatment. Guidelines emphasise intervention in many patients, which involves chest drain insertion, hospital admission and occasionally surgery. However, there is evidence that conservative management may be effective and safe, and it may also reduce the risk of recurrence. Significant questions remain regarding the optimal initial approach to the management of PSP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, prospective, randomised, open label, parallel group, non-inferiority study will randomise 342 participants with a first large PSP to conservative or interventional management. To maintain allocation concealment, randomisation will be performed in real time by computer and stratified by study site. Conservative management will involve a period of observation prior to discharge, with intervention for worsening symptoms or physiological instability. Interventional treatment will involve insertion of a small bore drain. If drainage continues after 1 hour, the patient will be admitted. If drainage stops, the drain will be clamped for 4 hours. The patient will be discharged if the lung remains inflated. Otherwise, the patient will be admitted. The primary end point is the proportion of participants with complete lung re-expansion by 8 weeks. Secondary end points are as follows: days in hospital, persistent air leak, predefined complications and adverse events, time to resolution of symptoms, and pneumothorax recurrence during a follow-up period of at least 1 year. The study has 95% power to detect an absolute non-inferiority margin of 9%, assuming 99% successful expansion at 8 weeks in the invasive treatment arm. The primary analysis will be by intention to treat. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Local ethics approval has been obtained for all sites. Study findings will be disseminated by publication in a high-impact international journal and presentation at major international Emergency Medicine and Respiratory meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12611000184976; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5030537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50305372016-10-04 Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of invasive versus conservative management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax Brown, Simon G A Ball, Emma L Perrin, Kyle Read, Catherine A Asha, Stephen E Beasley, Richard Egerton-Warburton, Diana Jones, Peter G Keijzers, Gerben Kinnear, Frances B Kwan, Ben C H Lee, Y C Gary Smith, Julian A Summers, Quentin A Simpson, Graham BMJ Open Respiratory Medicine INTRODUCTION: Current management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is variable, with little evidence from randomised controlled trials to guide treatment. Guidelines emphasise intervention in many patients, which involves chest drain insertion, hospital admission and occasionally surgery. However, there is evidence that conservative management may be effective and safe, and it may also reduce the risk of recurrence. Significant questions remain regarding the optimal initial approach to the management of PSP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, prospective, randomised, open label, parallel group, non-inferiority study will randomise 342 participants with a first large PSP to conservative or interventional management. To maintain allocation concealment, randomisation will be performed in real time by computer and stratified by study site. Conservative management will involve a period of observation prior to discharge, with intervention for worsening symptoms or physiological instability. Interventional treatment will involve insertion of a small bore drain. If drainage continues after 1 hour, the patient will be admitted. If drainage stops, the drain will be clamped for 4 hours. The patient will be discharged if the lung remains inflated. Otherwise, the patient will be admitted. The primary end point is the proportion of participants with complete lung re-expansion by 8 weeks. Secondary end points are as follows: days in hospital, persistent air leak, predefined complications and adverse events, time to resolution of symptoms, and pneumothorax recurrence during a follow-up period of at least 1 year. The study has 95% power to detect an absolute non-inferiority margin of 9%, assuming 99% successful expansion at 8 weeks in the invasive treatment arm. The primary analysis will be by intention to treat. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Local ethics approval has been obtained for all sites. Study findings will be disseminated by publication in a high-impact international journal and presentation at major international Emergency Medicine and Respiratory meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12611000184976; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5030537/ /pubmed/27625060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011826 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Respiratory Medicine
Brown, Simon G A
Ball, Emma L
Perrin, Kyle
Read, Catherine A
Asha, Stephen E
Beasley, Richard
Egerton-Warburton, Diana
Jones, Peter G
Keijzers, Gerben
Kinnear, Frances B
Kwan, Ben C H
Lee, Y C Gary
Smith, Julian A
Summers, Quentin A
Simpson, Graham
Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of invasive versus conservative management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax
title Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of invasive versus conservative management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax
title_full Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of invasive versus conservative management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax
title_fullStr Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of invasive versus conservative management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of invasive versus conservative management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax
title_short Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of invasive versus conservative management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax
title_sort study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of invasive versus conservative management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax
topic Respiratory Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5030537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27625060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011826
work_keys_str_mv AT brownsimonga studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofinvasiveversusconservativemanagementofprimaryspontaneouspneumothorax
AT ballemmal studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofinvasiveversusconservativemanagementofprimaryspontaneouspneumothorax
AT perrinkyle studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofinvasiveversusconservativemanagementofprimaryspontaneouspneumothorax
AT readcatherinea studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofinvasiveversusconservativemanagementofprimaryspontaneouspneumothorax
AT ashastephene studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofinvasiveversusconservativemanagementofprimaryspontaneouspneumothorax
AT beasleyrichard studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofinvasiveversusconservativemanagementofprimaryspontaneouspneumothorax
AT egertonwarburtondiana studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofinvasiveversusconservativemanagementofprimaryspontaneouspneumothorax
AT jonespeterg studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofinvasiveversusconservativemanagementofprimaryspontaneouspneumothorax
AT keijzersgerben studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofinvasiveversusconservativemanagementofprimaryspontaneouspneumothorax
AT kinnearfrancesb studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofinvasiveversusconservativemanagementofprimaryspontaneouspneumothorax
AT kwanbench studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofinvasiveversusconservativemanagementofprimaryspontaneouspneumothorax
AT leeycgary studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofinvasiveversusconservativemanagementofprimaryspontaneouspneumothorax
AT smithjuliana studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofinvasiveversusconservativemanagementofprimaryspontaneouspneumothorax
AT summersquentina studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofinvasiveversusconservativemanagementofprimaryspontaneouspneumothorax
AT simpsongraham studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofinvasiveversusconservativemanagementofprimaryspontaneouspneumothorax
AT studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofinvasiveversusconservativemanagementofprimaryspontaneouspneumothorax