Cargando…

Exploring senior doctors’ beliefs and attitudes regarding mental illness within the medical profession: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVE: To explore the views of senior doctors on mental illness within the medical profession. BACKGROUND: There has been increasing interest on the issue of doctors’ mental health. However, there have been few qualitative studies on senior doctors’ general attitude towards mental illness within...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bianchi, Eleonora F, Bhattacharyya, Mimi R, Meakin, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5030586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27638497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012598
_version_ 1782454704886775808
author Bianchi, Eleonora F
Bhattacharyya, Mimi R
Meakin, Richard
author_facet Bianchi, Eleonora F
Bhattacharyya, Mimi R
Meakin, Richard
author_sort Bianchi, Eleonora F
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore the views of senior doctors on mental illness within the medical profession. BACKGROUND: There has been increasing interest on the issue of doctors’ mental health. However, there have been few qualitative studies on senior doctors’ general attitude towards mental illness within the medical profession. SETTING: Large North London teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 13 hospital consultants and senior academic general practitioners. METHODS: A qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews and reflective work. The outcome measures were the themes derived from the thematic framework approach to analysis. RESULTS: Four main themes were identified. (1) ‘Doctors’ attitudes to mental illness’—doctors felt that there remained a significant stigma attached to suffering from a mental illness within the profession. (2) ‘Barriers to seeking help’—doctors felt that there were numerous barriers to seeking help such as negative career implications, being perceived as weak, denial and fear of prejudice. (3) ‘Support’—doctors felt that the use of support depended on certainty concerning confidentiality, which for occupational health was not thought to be guaranteed. Confiding in colleagues was rare except among close friends. Supervision for all doctors was raised. (4) ‘General Medical Council (GMC) involvement’—doctors felt that uneasy referring colleagues to the GMC and the appraisal and revalidation process was thought not to be thorough enough in picking up doctors with a mental illness. CONCLUSIONS: Owing to the small size of this study, the conclusions are limited; however, if the findings are confirmed by larger studies, they suggest that greater efforts are needed to destigmatise mental illness in the profession and improve support for doctors. Additional research should be carried out into doctors’ views on occupational health services in managing doctors with mental illness, the provision of supervision for all doctors and the effectiveness of the current appraisal and revalidation process at identifying doctors with a mental illness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5030586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50305862016-10-04 Exploring senior doctors’ beliefs and attitudes regarding mental illness within the medical profession: a qualitative study Bianchi, Eleonora F Bhattacharyya, Mimi R Meakin, Richard BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVE: To explore the views of senior doctors on mental illness within the medical profession. BACKGROUND: There has been increasing interest on the issue of doctors’ mental health. However, there have been few qualitative studies on senior doctors’ general attitude towards mental illness within the medical profession. SETTING: Large North London teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 13 hospital consultants and senior academic general practitioners. METHODS: A qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews and reflective work. The outcome measures were the themes derived from the thematic framework approach to analysis. RESULTS: Four main themes were identified. (1) ‘Doctors’ attitudes to mental illness’—doctors felt that there remained a significant stigma attached to suffering from a mental illness within the profession. (2) ‘Barriers to seeking help’—doctors felt that there were numerous barriers to seeking help such as negative career implications, being perceived as weak, denial and fear of prejudice. (3) ‘Support’—doctors felt that the use of support depended on certainty concerning confidentiality, which for occupational health was not thought to be guaranteed. Confiding in colleagues was rare except among close friends. Supervision for all doctors was raised. (4) ‘General Medical Council (GMC) involvement’—doctors felt that uneasy referring colleagues to the GMC and the appraisal and revalidation process was thought not to be thorough enough in picking up doctors with a mental illness. CONCLUSIONS: Owing to the small size of this study, the conclusions are limited; however, if the findings are confirmed by larger studies, they suggest that greater efforts are needed to destigmatise mental illness in the profession and improve support for doctors. Additional research should be carried out into doctors’ views on occupational health services in managing doctors with mental illness, the provision of supervision for all doctors and the effectiveness of the current appraisal and revalidation process at identifying doctors with a mental illness. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5030586/ /pubmed/27638497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012598 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Mental Health
Bianchi, Eleonora F
Bhattacharyya, Mimi R
Meakin, Richard
Exploring senior doctors’ beliefs and attitudes regarding mental illness within the medical profession: a qualitative study
title Exploring senior doctors’ beliefs and attitudes regarding mental illness within the medical profession: a qualitative study
title_full Exploring senior doctors’ beliefs and attitudes regarding mental illness within the medical profession: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Exploring senior doctors’ beliefs and attitudes regarding mental illness within the medical profession: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Exploring senior doctors’ beliefs and attitudes regarding mental illness within the medical profession: a qualitative study
title_short Exploring senior doctors’ beliefs and attitudes regarding mental illness within the medical profession: a qualitative study
title_sort exploring senior doctors’ beliefs and attitudes regarding mental illness within the medical profession: a qualitative study
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5030586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27638497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012598
work_keys_str_mv AT bianchieleonoraf exploringseniordoctorsbeliefsandattitudesregardingmentalillnesswithinthemedicalprofessionaqualitativestudy
AT bhattacharyyamimir exploringseniordoctorsbeliefsandattitudesregardingmentalillnesswithinthemedicalprofessionaqualitativestudy
AT meakinrichard exploringseniordoctorsbeliefsandattitudesregardingmentalillnesswithinthemedicalprofessionaqualitativestudy