Cargando…

Protocol for process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of family-led rehabilitation post stroke (ATTEND) in India

INTRODUCTION: We are undertaking a randomised controlled trial (fAmily led rehabiliTaTion aftEr stroke in INDia, ATTEND) evaluating training a family carer to enable maximal rehabilitation of patients with stroke-related disability; as a potentially affordable, culturally acceptable and effective in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Hueiming, Lindley, Richard, Alim, Mohammed, Felix, Cynthia, Gandhi, Dorcas B C, Verma, Shweta J, Tugnawat, Deepak Kumar, Syrigapu, Anuradha, Ramamurthy, Ramaprabhu Krishnappa, Pandian, Jeyaraj D, Walker, Marion, Forster, Anne, Anderson, Craig S, Langhorne, Peter, Murthy, Gudlavalleti Venkata Satyanarayana, Shamanna, Bindiganavale Ramaswamy, Hackett, Maree L, Maulik, Pallab K, Harvey, Lisa A, Jan, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5030603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27633636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012027
_version_ 1782454706864390144
author Liu, Hueiming
Lindley, Richard
Alim, Mohammed
Felix, Cynthia
Gandhi, Dorcas B C
Verma, Shweta J
Tugnawat, Deepak Kumar
Syrigapu, Anuradha
Ramamurthy, Ramaprabhu Krishnappa
Pandian, Jeyaraj D
Walker, Marion
Forster, Anne
Anderson, Craig S
Langhorne, Peter
Murthy, Gudlavalleti Venkata Satyanarayana
Shamanna, Bindiganavale Ramaswamy
Hackett, Maree L
Maulik, Pallab K
Harvey, Lisa A
Jan, Stephen
author_facet Liu, Hueiming
Lindley, Richard
Alim, Mohammed
Felix, Cynthia
Gandhi, Dorcas B C
Verma, Shweta J
Tugnawat, Deepak Kumar
Syrigapu, Anuradha
Ramamurthy, Ramaprabhu Krishnappa
Pandian, Jeyaraj D
Walker, Marion
Forster, Anne
Anderson, Craig S
Langhorne, Peter
Murthy, Gudlavalleti Venkata Satyanarayana
Shamanna, Bindiganavale Ramaswamy
Hackett, Maree L
Maulik, Pallab K
Harvey, Lisa A
Jan, Stephen
author_sort Liu, Hueiming
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We are undertaking a randomised controlled trial (fAmily led rehabiliTaTion aftEr stroke in INDia, ATTEND) evaluating training a family carer to enable maximal rehabilitation of patients with stroke-related disability; as a potentially affordable, culturally acceptable and effective intervention for use in India. A process evaluation is needed to understand how and why this complex intervention may be effective, and to capture important barriers and facilitators to its implementation. We describe the protocol for our process evaluation to encourage the development of in-process evaluation methodology and transparency in reporting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The realist and RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance) frameworks informed the design. Mixed methods include semistructured interviews with health providers, patients and their carers, analysis of quantitative process data describing fidelity and dose of intervention, observations of trial set up and implementation, and the analysis of the cost data from the patients and their families perspective and programme budgets. These qualitative and quantitative data will be analysed iteratively prior to knowing the quantitative outcomes of the trial, and then triangulated with the results from the primary outcome evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The process evaluation has received ethical approval for all sites in India. In low-income and middle-income countries, the available human capital can form an approach to reducing the evidence practice gap, compared with the high cost alternatives available in established market economies. This process evaluation will provide insights into how such a programme can be implemented in practice and brought to scale. Through local stakeholder engagement and dissemination of findings globally we hope to build on patient-centred, cost-effective and sustainable models of stroke rehabilitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2013/04/003557.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5030603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50306032016-10-04 Protocol for process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of family-led rehabilitation post stroke (ATTEND) in India Liu, Hueiming Lindley, Richard Alim, Mohammed Felix, Cynthia Gandhi, Dorcas B C Verma, Shweta J Tugnawat, Deepak Kumar Syrigapu, Anuradha Ramamurthy, Ramaprabhu Krishnappa Pandian, Jeyaraj D Walker, Marion Forster, Anne Anderson, Craig S Langhorne, Peter Murthy, Gudlavalleti Venkata Satyanarayana Shamanna, Bindiganavale Ramaswamy Hackett, Maree L Maulik, Pallab K Harvey, Lisa A Jan, Stephen BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: We are undertaking a randomised controlled trial (fAmily led rehabiliTaTion aftEr stroke in INDia, ATTEND) evaluating training a family carer to enable maximal rehabilitation of patients with stroke-related disability; as a potentially affordable, culturally acceptable and effective intervention for use in India. A process evaluation is needed to understand how and why this complex intervention may be effective, and to capture important barriers and facilitators to its implementation. We describe the protocol for our process evaluation to encourage the development of in-process evaluation methodology and transparency in reporting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The realist and RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance) frameworks informed the design. Mixed methods include semistructured interviews with health providers, patients and their carers, analysis of quantitative process data describing fidelity and dose of intervention, observations of trial set up and implementation, and the analysis of the cost data from the patients and their families perspective and programme budgets. These qualitative and quantitative data will be analysed iteratively prior to knowing the quantitative outcomes of the trial, and then triangulated with the results from the primary outcome evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The process evaluation has received ethical approval for all sites in India. In low-income and middle-income countries, the available human capital can form an approach to reducing the evidence practice gap, compared with the high cost alternatives available in established market economies. This process evaluation will provide insights into how such a programme can be implemented in practice and brought to scale. Through local stakeholder engagement and dissemination of findings globally we hope to build on patient-centred, cost-effective and sustainable models of stroke rehabilitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2013/04/003557. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5030603/ /pubmed/27633636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012027 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Liu, Hueiming
Lindley, Richard
Alim, Mohammed
Felix, Cynthia
Gandhi, Dorcas B C
Verma, Shweta J
Tugnawat, Deepak Kumar
Syrigapu, Anuradha
Ramamurthy, Ramaprabhu Krishnappa
Pandian, Jeyaraj D
Walker, Marion
Forster, Anne
Anderson, Craig S
Langhorne, Peter
Murthy, Gudlavalleti Venkata Satyanarayana
Shamanna, Bindiganavale Ramaswamy
Hackett, Maree L
Maulik, Pallab K
Harvey, Lisa A
Jan, Stephen
Protocol for process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of family-led rehabilitation post stroke (ATTEND) in India
title Protocol for process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of family-led rehabilitation post stroke (ATTEND) in India
title_full Protocol for process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of family-led rehabilitation post stroke (ATTEND) in India
title_fullStr Protocol for process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of family-led rehabilitation post stroke (ATTEND) in India
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of family-led rehabilitation post stroke (ATTEND) in India
title_short Protocol for process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of family-led rehabilitation post stroke (ATTEND) in India
title_sort protocol for process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of family-led rehabilitation post stroke (attend) in india
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5030603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27633636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012027
work_keys_str_mv AT liuhueiming protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia
AT lindleyrichard protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia
AT alimmohammed protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia
AT felixcynthia protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia
AT gandhidorcasbc protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia
AT vermashwetaj protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia
AT tugnawatdeepakkumar protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia
AT syrigapuanuradha protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia
AT ramamurthyramaprabhukrishnappa protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia
AT pandianjeyarajd protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia
AT walkermarion protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia
AT forsteranne protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia
AT andersoncraigs protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia
AT langhornepeter protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia
AT murthygudlavalletivenkatasatyanarayana protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia
AT shamannabindiganavaleramaswamy protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia
AT hackettmareel protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia
AT maulikpallabk protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia
AT harveylisaa protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia
AT janstephen protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia