Cargando…
Protocol for process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of family-led rehabilitation post stroke (ATTEND) in India
INTRODUCTION: We are undertaking a randomised controlled trial (fAmily led rehabiliTaTion aftEr stroke in INDia, ATTEND) evaluating training a family carer to enable maximal rehabilitation of patients with stroke-related disability; as a potentially affordable, culturally acceptable and effective in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5030603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27633636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012027 |
_version_ | 1782454706864390144 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Hueiming Lindley, Richard Alim, Mohammed Felix, Cynthia Gandhi, Dorcas B C Verma, Shweta J Tugnawat, Deepak Kumar Syrigapu, Anuradha Ramamurthy, Ramaprabhu Krishnappa Pandian, Jeyaraj D Walker, Marion Forster, Anne Anderson, Craig S Langhorne, Peter Murthy, Gudlavalleti Venkata Satyanarayana Shamanna, Bindiganavale Ramaswamy Hackett, Maree L Maulik, Pallab K Harvey, Lisa A Jan, Stephen |
author_facet | Liu, Hueiming Lindley, Richard Alim, Mohammed Felix, Cynthia Gandhi, Dorcas B C Verma, Shweta J Tugnawat, Deepak Kumar Syrigapu, Anuradha Ramamurthy, Ramaprabhu Krishnappa Pandian, Jeyaraj D Walker, Marion Forster, Anne Anderson, Craig S Langhorne, Peter Murthy, Gudlavalleti Venkata Satyanarayana Shamanna, Bindiganavale Ramaswamy Hackett, Maree L Maulik, Pallab K Harvey, Lisa A Jan, Stephen |
author_sort | Liu, Hueiming |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: We are undertaking a randomised controlled trial (fAmily led rehabiliTaTion aftEr stroke in INDia, ATTEND) evaluating training a family carer to enable maximal rehabilitation of patients with stroke-related disability; as a potentially affordable, culturally acceptable and effective intervention for use in India. A process evaluation is needed to understand how and why this complex intervention may be effective, and to capture important barriers and facilitators to its implementation. We describe the protocol for our process evaluation to encourage the development of in-process evaluation methodology and transparency in reporting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The realist and RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance) frameworks informed the design. Mixed methods include semistructured interviews with health providers, patients and their carers, analysis of quantitative process data describing fidelity and dose of intervention, observations of trial set up and implementation, and the analysis of the cost data from the patients and their families perspective and programme budgets. These qualitative and quantitative data will be analysed iteratively prior to knowing the quantitative outcomes of the trial, and then triangulated with the results from the primary outcome evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The process evaluation has received ethical approval for all sites in India. In low-income and middle-income countries, the available human capital can form an approach to reducing the evidence practice gap, compared with the high cost alternatives available in established market economies. This process evaluation will provide insights into how such a programme can be implemented in practice and brought to scale. Through local stakeholder engagement and dissemination of findings globally we hope to build on patient-centred, cost-effective and sustainable models of stroke rehabilitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2013/04/003557. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5030603 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50306032016-10-04 Protocol for process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of family-led rehabilitation post stroke (ATTEND) in India Liu, Hueiming Lindley, Richard Alim, Mohammed Felix, Cynthia Gandhi, Dorcas B C Verma, Shweta J Tugnawat, Deepak Kumar Syrigapu, Anuradha Ramamurthy, Ramaprabhu Krishnappa Pandian, Jeyaraj D Walker, Marion Forster, Anne Anderson, Craig S Langhorne, Peter Murthy, Gudlavalleti Venkata Satyanarayana Shamanna, Bindiganavale Ramaswamy Hackett, Maree L Maulik, Pallab K Harvey, Lisa A Jan, Stephen BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: We are undertaking a randomised controlled trial (fAmily led rehabiliTaTion aftEr stroke in INDia, ATTEND) evaluating training a family carer to enable maximal rehabilitation of patients with stroke-related disability; as a potentially affordable, culturally acceptable and effective intervention for use in India. A process evaluation is needed to understand how and why this complex intervention may be effective, and to capture important barriers and facilitators to its implementation. We describe the protocol for our process evaluation to encourage the development of in-process evaluation methodology and transparency in reporting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The realist and RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance) frameworks informed the design. Mixed methods include semistructured interviews with health providers, patients and their carers, analysis of quantitative process data describing fidelity and dose of intervention, observations of trial set up and implementation, and the analysis of the cost data from the patients and their families perspective and programme budgets. These qualitative and quantitative data will be analysed iteratively prior to knowing the quantitative outcomes of the trial, and then triangulated with the results from the primary outcome evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The process evaluation has received ethical approval for all sites in India. In low-income and middle-income countries, the available human capital can form an approach to reducing the evidence practice gap, compared with the high cost alternatives available in established market economies. This process evaluation will provide insights into how such a programme can be implemented in practice and brought to scale. Through local stakeholder engagement and dissemination of findings globally we hope to build on patient-centred, cost-effective and sustainable models of stroke rehabilitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2013/04/003557. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5030603/ /pubmed/27633636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012027 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Liu, Hueiming Lindley, Richard Alim, Mohammed Felix, Cynthia Gandhi, Dorcas B C Verma, Shweta J Tugnawat, Deepak Kumar Syrigapu, Anuradha Ramamurthy, Ramaprabhu Krishnappa Pandian, Jeyaraj D Walker, Marion Forster, Anne Anderson, Craig S Langhorne, Peter Murthy, Gudlavalleti Venkata Satyanarayana Shamanna, Bindiganavale Ramaswamy Hackett, Maree L Maulik, Pallab K Harvey, Lisa A Jan, Stephen Protocol for process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of family-led rehabilitation post stroke (ATTEND) in India |
title | Protocol for process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of family-led rehabilitation post stroke (ATTEND) in India |
title_full | Protocol for process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of family-led rehabilitation post stroke (ATTEND) in India |
title_fullStr | Protocol for process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of family-led rehabilitation post stroke (ATTEND) in India |
title_full_unstemmed | Protocol for process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of family-led rehabilitation post stroke (ATTEND) in India |
title_short | Protocol for process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of family-led rehabilitation post stroke (ATTEND) in India |
title_sort | protocol for process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of family-led rehabilitation post stroke (attend) in india |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5030603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27633636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuhueiming protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia AT lindleyrichard protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia AT alimmohammed protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia AT felixcynthia protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia AT gandhidorcasbc protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia AT vermashwetaj protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia AT tugnawatdeepakkumar protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia AT syrigapuanuradha protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia AT ramamurthyramaprabhukrishnappa protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia AT pandianjeyarajd protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia AT walkermarion protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia AT forsteranne protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia AT andersoncraigs protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia AT langhornepeter protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia AT murthygudlavalletivenkatasatyanarayana protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia AT shamannabindiganavaleramaswamy protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia AT hackettmareel protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia AT maulikpallabk protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia AT harveylisaa protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia AT janstephen protocolforprocessevaluationofarandomisedcontrolledtrialoffamilyledrehabilitationpoststrokeattendinindia |