Cargando…

Neural Correlates of the Time Marker for the Perception of Event Timing

While sensory processing latency, inferred from the manual reaction time (RT), is substantially affected by diverse stimulus parameters, subjective temporal judgments are relatively accurate. The neural mechanisms underlying this timing perception remain obscure. Here, we measured human neural activ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amano, Kaoru, Qi, Liang, Terada, Yoshikazu, Nishida, Shin’ya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Neuroscience 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5030839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27679810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0144-16.2016
_version_ 1782454747188428800
author Amano, Kaoru
Qi, Liang
Terada, Yoshikazu
Nishida, Shin’ya
author_facet Amano, Kaoru
Qi, Liang
Terada, Yoshikazu
Nishida, Shin’ya
author_sort Amano, Kaoru
collection PubMed
description While sensory processing latency, inferred from the manual reaction time (RT), is substantially affected by diverse stimulus parameters, subjective temporal judgments are relatively accurate. The neural mechanisms underlying this timing perception remain obscure. Here, we measured human neural activity by magnetoencephalography while participants performed a simultaneity judgment task between the onset of random-dot coherent motion and a beep. In a separate session, participants performed an RT task for the same stimuli. We analyzed the relationship between neural activity evoked by motion onset and point of subjective simultaneity (PSS) or RT. The effect of motion coherence was smaller for PSS than RT, but changes in RT and PSS could both be predicted by the time at which an integrated sensory response crossed a threshold. The task differences could be ascribed to the lower threshold for PSS than for RT. In agreement with the psychophysical threshold difference, the participants reported longer delays in their motor response from the subjective motion onset for weaker stimuli. However, they could not judge the timing of stimuli weaker than the detection threshold. A possible interpretation of the present findings is that the brain assigns the time marker for timing perception prior to stimulus detection, but the time marker is available only after stimulus detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5030839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Society for Neuroscience
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50308392016-09-27 Neural Correlates of the Time Marker for the Perception of Event Timing Amano, Kaoru Qi, Liang Terada, Yoshikazu Nishida, Shin’ya eNeuro New Research While sensory processing latency, inferred from the manual reaction time (RT), is substantially affected by diverse stimulus parameters, subjective temporal judgments are relatively accurate. The neural mechanisms underlying this timing perception remain obscure. Here, we measured human neural activity by magnetoencephalography while participants performed a simultaneity judgment task between the onset of random-dot coherent motion and a beep. In a separate session, participants performed an RT task for the same stimuli. We analyzed the relationship between neural activity evoked by motion onset and point of subjective simultaneity (PSS) or RT. The effect of motion coherence was smaller for PSS than RT, but changes in RT and PSS could both be predicted by the time at which an integrated sensory response crossed a threshold. The task differences could be ascribed to the lower threshold for PSS than for RT. In agreement with the psychophysical threshold difference, the participants reported longer delays in their motor response from the subjective motion onset for weaker stimuli. However, they could not judge the timing of stimuli weaker than the detection threshold. A possible interpretation of the present findings is that the brain assigns the time marker for timing perception prior to stimulus detection, but the time marker is available only after stimulus detection. Society for Neuroscience 2016-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5030839/ /pubmed/27679810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0144-16.2016 Text en Copyright © 2016 Amano et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle New Research
Amano, Kaoru
Qi, Liang
Terada, Yoshikazu
Nishida, Shin’ya
Neural Correlates of the Time Marker for the Perception of Event Timing
title Neural Correlates of the Time Marker for the Perception of Event Timing
title_full Neural Correlates of the Time Marker for the Perception of Event Timing
title_fullStr Neural Correlates of the Time Marker for the Perception of Event Timing
title_full_unstemmed Neural Correlates of the Time Marker for the Perception of Event Timing
title_short Neural Correlates of the Time Marker for the Perception of Event Timing
title_sort neural correlates of the time marker for the perception of event timing
topic New Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5030839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27679810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0144-16.2016
work_keys_str_mv AT amanokaoru neuralcorrelatesofthetimemarkerfortheperceptionofeventtiming
AT qiliang neuralcorrelatesofthetimemarkerfortheperceptionofeventtiming
AT teradayoshikazu neuralcorrelatesofthetimemarkerfortheperceptionofeventtiming
AT nishidashinya neuralcorrelatesofthetimemarkerfortheperceptionofeventtiming