Cargando…

Pre-contact by telephone increases response rates to postal questionnaires in a population of stroke patients: an open ended randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: A follow-up study on a cohort of stroke patients through a postal survey questionnaire 3 and 12 months after discharge from hospital was performed. The response rate at 3-months follow-up was lower than desired, and pre-contact by phone as a measure for increasing the response rate at 12...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barra, Mathias, Simonsen, Tone Breines, Dahl, Fredrik Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5031317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27654008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1732-8
_version_ 1782454786967207936
author Barra, Mathias
Simonsen, Tone Breines
Dahl, Fredrik Andreas
author_facet Barra, Mathias
Simonsen, Tone Breines
Dahl, Fredrik Andreas
author_sort Barra, Mathias
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A follow-up study on a cohort of stroke patients through a postal survey questionnaire 3 and 12 months after discharge from hospital was performed. The response rate at 3-months follow-up was lower than desired, and pre-contact by phone as a measure for increasing the response rate at 12 months was studied. METHODS: The study design was a randomized controlled trial on a cohort of 3 months follow-up-non-responders where the intervention group was pre-contacted with an aim to obtain an informal ’consent to receive’ the questionnaire before the 12-months survey was mailed, and the control group was not. The primary outcome was 45 days response rate; secondary outcome was 365 days response rate. The main analysis followed the intention to treat principle. A secondary, per-protocol analysis (i.e. subjects who were not reached by phone were reassigned to the control group) is included. Also included is a rudimentary cost-utility analysis, where we estimated the cost per additional response. RESULTS: Of the 235 subjects, 116 were randomized to the intervention group and 119 to the control group. 10 were excluded due to death (7 in the IG and 3 in the CG), 6 due to dementia (3 in the IG and 3 in the CG), and 2 (1 in the IG and 1 in the CG) for other reasons. The primary outcome was a response rate of 42.9 % in the intervention group, and 26.8 % in the control group, giving p =0.014, with estimated OR of 2.04 (95 % CI [1.16,3.64]). The secondary outcome had p =0.009 with OR 2.10 (95 % CI [1.20,3.70]). The as-per-protocol analyses gave stronger results with p =0.001 and p =0.003, respectively. The cost-utility analysis gave a time cost of 1 working hour per additional response. CONCLUSIONS: The results are in line with previous research, and show that pre-contact has a positive effect on response rate also for a population of elderly with reduced health. Given the importance of high response rate in surveys, a cost of 1 working hour per additional response is likely to be worth while. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration with ISRCTN initiated on 05/21/2013 and finalised on 06/30/2014 with http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN31304930. Following the prospective submission in May 2013, there were no subsequent changes to the protocol. The recruitment started on 01/06/13, after initiation of public registration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5031317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50313172016-09-29 Pre-contact by telephone increases response rates to postal questionnaires in a population of stroke patients: an open ended randomized controlled trial Barra, Mathias Simonsen, Tone Breines Dahl, Fredrik Andreas BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: A follow-up study on a cohort of stroke patients through a postal survey questionnaire 3 and 12 months after discharge from hospital was performed. The response rate at 3-months follow-up was lower than desired, and pre-contact by phone as a measure for increasing the response rate at 12 months was studied. METHODS: The study design was a randomized controlled trial on a cohort of 3 months follow-up-non-responders where the intervention group was pre-contacted with an aim to obtain an informal ’consent to receive’ the questionnaire before the 12-months survey was mailed, and the control group was not. The primary outcome was 45 days response rate; secondary outcome was 365 days response rate. The main analysis followed the intention to treat principle. A secondary, per-protocol analysis (i.e. subjects who were not reached by phone were reassigned to the control group) is included. Also included is a rudimentary cost-utility analysis, where we estimated the cost per additional response. RESULTS: Of the 235 subjects, 116 were randomized to the intervention group and 119 to the control group. 10 were excluded due to death (7 in the IG and 3 in the CG), 6 due to dementia (3 in the IG and 3 in the CG), and 2 (1 in the IG and 1 in the CG) for other reasons. The primary outcome was a response rate of 42.9 % in the intervention group, and 26.8 % in the control group, giving p =0.014, with estimated OR of 2.04 (95 % CI [1.16,3.64]). The secondary outcome had p =0.009 with OR 2.10 (95 % CI [1.20,3.70]). The as-per-protocol analyses gave stronger results with p =0.001 and p =0.003, respectively. The cost-utility analysis gave a time cost of 1 working hour per additional response. CONCLUSIONS: The results are in line with previous research, and show that pre-contact has a positive effect on response rate also for a population of elderly with reduced health. Given the importance of high response rate in surveys, a cost of 1 working hour per additional response is likely to be worth while. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration with ISRCTN initiated on 05/21/2013 and finalised on 06/30/2014 with http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN31304930. Following the prospective submission in May 2013, there were no subsequent changes to the protocol. The recruitment started on 01/06/13, after initiation of public registration. BioMed Central 2016-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5031317/ /pubmed/27654008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1732-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barra, Mathias
Simonsen, Tone Breines
Dahl, Fredrik Andreas
Pre-contact by telephone increases response rates to postal questionnaires in a population of stroke patients: an open ended randomized controlled trial
title Pre-contact by telephone increases response rates to postal questionnaires in a population of stroke patients: an open ended randomized controlled trial
title_full Pre-contact by telephone increases response rates to postal questionnaires in a population of stroke patients: an open ended randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Pre-contact by telephone increases response rates to postal questionnaires in a population of stroke patients: an open ended randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Pre-contact by telephone increases response rates to postal questionnaires in a population of stroke patients: an open ended randomized controlled trial
title_short Pre-contact by telephone increases response rates to postal questionnaires in a population of stroke patients: an open ended randomized controlled trial
title_sort pre-contact by telephone increases response rates to postal questionnaires in a population of stroke patients: an open ended randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5031317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27654008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1732-8
work_keys_str_mv AT barramathias precontactbytelephoneincreasesresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinapopulationofstrokepatientsanopenendedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT simonsentonebreines precontactbytelephoneincreasesresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinapopulationofstrokepatientsanopenendedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dahlfredrikandreas precontactbytelephoneincreasesresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinapopulationofstrokepatientsanopenendedrandomizedcontrolledtrial