Cargando…
Mental health pharmacists views on shared decision-making for antipsychotics in serious mental illness
Background People diagnosed with serious mental illnesses (SMIs) such as schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder are frequently treated with antipsychotics. National guidance advises the use of shared decision-making (SDM) in antipsychotic prescribing. There is currently little data on the opin...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5031729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27450504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0352-z |
_version_ | 1782454845916053504 |
---|---|
author | Younas, Mediha Bradley, Eleanor Holmes, Nikki Sud, Dolly Maidment, Ian D. |
author_facet | Younas, Mediha Bradley, Eleanor Holmes, Nikki Sud, Dolly Maidment, Ian D. |
author_sort | Younas, Mediha |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background People diagnosed with serious mental illnesses (SMIs) such as schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder are frequently treated with antipsychotics. National guidance advises the use of shared decision-making (SDM) in antipsychotic prescribing. There is currently little data on the opinions of health professionals on the role of SDM. Objective To explore the views and experiences of UK mental health pharmacists regarding the use of SDM in antipsychotic prescribing in people diagnosed with SMI. Setting The study was conducted by interviewing secondary care mental health pharmacists in the UK to obtain qualitative data. Methods Semi-structured interviews were recorded. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted using the method of constant comparison. Main outcome measure Themes evolving from mental health pharmacists on SDM in relation to antipsychotic prescribing in people with SMI. Results Thirteen mental health pharmacists were interviewed. SDM was perceived to be linked to positive clinical outcomes including adherence, service user satisfaction and improved therapeutic relations. Despite more prescribers and service users supporting SDM, it was not seen as being practised as widely as it could be; this was attributed to a number of barriers, most predominantly issues surrounding service user’s lacking capacity to engage in SDM and time pressures on clinical staff. The need for greater effort to work around the issues, engage service users and adopt a more inter-professional approach was conveyed. Conclusion The mental health pharmacists support SDM for antipsychotic prescribing, believing that it improves outcomes. However, barriers are seen to limit implementation. More research is needed into overcoming the barriers and measuring the benefits of SDM, along with exploring a more inter-professional approach to SDM. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11096-016-0352-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5031729 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50317292016-10-09 Mental health pharmacists views on shared decision-making for antipsychotics in serious mental illness Younas, Mediha Bradley, Eleanor Holmes, Nikki Sud, Dolly Maidment, Ian D. Int J Clin Pharm Research Article Background People diagnosed with serious mental illnesses (SMIs) such as schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder are frequently treated with antipsychotics. National guidance advises the use of shared decision-making (SDM) in antipsychotic prescribing. There is currently little data on the opinions of health professionals on the role of SDM. Objective To explore the views and experiences of UK mental health pharmacists regarding the use of SDM in antipsychotic prescribing in people diagnosed with SMI. Setting The study was conducted by interviewing secondary care mental health pharmacists in the UK to obtain qualitative data. Methods Semi-structured interviews were recorded. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted using the method of constant comparison. Main outcome measure Themes evolving from mental health pharmacists on SDM in relation to antipsychotic prescribing in people with SMI. Results Thirteen mental health pharmacists were interviewed. SDM was perceived to be linked to positive clinical outcomes including adherence, service user satisfaction and improved therapeutic relations. Despite more prescribers and service users supporting SDM, it was not seen as being practised as widely as it could be; this was attributed to a number of barriers, most predominantly issues surrounding service user’s lacking capacity to engage in SDM and time pressures on clinical staff. The need for greater effort to work around the issues, engage service users and adopt a more inter-professional approach was conveyed. Conclusion The mental health pharmacists support SDM for antipsychotic prescribing, believing that it improves outcomes. However, barriers are seen to limit implementation. More research is needed into overcoming the barriers and measuring the benefits of SDM, along with exploring a more inter-professional approach to SDM. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11096-016-0352-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-07-23 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5031729/ /pubmed/27450504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0352-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Younas, Mediha Bradley, Eleanor Holmes, Nikki Sud, Dolly Maidment, Ian D. Mental health pharmacists views on shared decision-making for antipsychotics in serious mental illness |
title | Mental health pharmacists views on shared decision-making for antipsychotics in serious mental illness |
title_full | Mental health pharmacists views on shared decision-making for antipsychotics in serious mental illness |
title_fullStr | Mental health pharmacists views on shared decision-making for antipsychotics in serious mental illness |
title_full_unstemmed | Mental health pharmacists views on shared decision-making for antipsychotics in serious mental illness |
title_short | Mental health pharmacists views on shared decision-making for antipsychotics in serious mental illness |
title_sort | mental health pharmacists views on shared decision-making for antipsychotics in serious mental illness |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5031729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27450504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0352-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT younasmediha mentalhealthpharmacistsviewsonshareddecisionmakingforantipsychoticsinseriousmentalillness AT bradleyeleanor mentalhealthpharmacistsviewsonshareddecisionmakingforantipsychoticsinseriousmentalillness AT holmesnikki mentalhealthpharmacistsviewsonshareddecisionmakingforantipsychoticsinseriousmentalillness AT suddolly mentalhealthpharmacistsviewsonshareddecisionmakingforantipsychoticsinseriousmentalillness AT maidmentiand mentalhealthpharmacistsviewsonshareddecisionmakingforantipsychoticsinseriousmentalillness |