Cargando…

Mental health pharmacists views on shared decision-making for antipsychotics in serious mental illness

Background People diagnosed with serious mental illnesses (SMIs) such as schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder are frequently treated with antipsychotics. National guidance advises the use of shared decision-making (SDM) in antipsychotic prescribing. There is currently little data on the opin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Younas, Mediha, Bradley, Eleanor, Holmes, Nikki, Sud, Dolly, Maidment, Ian D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5031729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27450504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0352-z
_version_ 1782454845916053504
author Younas, Mediha
Bradley, Eleanor
Holmes, Nikki
Sud, Dolly
Maidment, Ian D.
author_facet Younas, Mediha
Bradley, Eleanor
Holmes, Nikki
Sud, Dolly
Maidment, Ian D.
author_sort Younas, Mediha
collection PubMed
description Background People diagnosed with serious mental illnesses (SMIs) such as schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder are frequently treated with antipsychotics. National guidance advises the use of shared decision-making (SDM) in antipsychotic prescribing. There is currently little data on the opinions of health professionals on the role of SDM. Objective To explore the views and experiences of UK mental health pharmacists regarding the use of SDM in antipsychotic prescribing in people diagnosed with SMI. Setting The study was conducted by interviewing secondary care mental health pharmacists in the UK to obtain qualitative data. Methods Semi-structured interviews were recorded. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted using the method of constant comparison. Main outcome measure Themes evolving from mental health pharmacists on SDM in relation to antipsychotic prescribing in people with SMI. Results Thirteen mental health pharmacists were interviewed. SDM was perceived to be linked to positive clinical outcomes including adherence, service user satisfaction and improved therapeutic relations. Despite more prescribers and service users supporting SDM, it was not seen as being practised as widely as it could be; this was attributed to a number of barriers, most predominantly issues surrounding service user’s lacking capacity to engage in SDM and time pressures on clinical staff. The need for greater effort to work around the issues, engage service users and adopt a more inter-professional approach was conveyed. Conclusion The mental health pharmacists support SDM for antipsychotic prescribing, believing that it improves outcomes. However, barriers are seen to limit implementation. More research is needed into overcoming the barriers and measuring the benefits of SDM, along with exploring a more inter-professional approach to SDM. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11096-016-0352-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5031729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50317292016-10-09 Mental health pharmacists views on shared decision-making for antipsychotics in serious mental illness Younas, Mediha Bradley, Eleanor Holmes, Nikki Sud, Dolly Maidment, Ian D. Int J Clin Pharm Research Article Background People diagnosed with serious mental illnesses (SMIs) such as schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder are frequently treated with antipsychotics. National guidance advises the use of shared decision-making (SDM) in antipsychotic prescribing. There is currently little data on the opinions of health professionals on the role of SDM. Objective To explore the views and experiences of UK mental health pharmacists regarding the use of SDM in antipsychotic prescribing in people diagnosed with SMI. Setting The study was conducted by interviewing secondary care mental health pharmacists in the UK to obtain qualitative data. Methods Semi-structured interviews were recorded. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted using the method of constant comparison. Main outcome measure Themes evolving from mental health pharmacists on SDM in relation to antipsychotic prescribing in people with SMI. Results Thirteen mental health pharmacists were interviewed. SDM was perceived to be linked to positive clinical outcomes including adherence, service user satisfaction and improved therapeutic relations. Despite more prescribers and service users supporting SDM, it was not seen as being practised as widely as it could be; this was attributed to a number of barriers, most predominantly issues surrounding service user’s lacking capacity to engage in SDM and time pressures on clinical staff. The need for greater effort to work around the issues, engage service users and adopt a more inter-professional approach was conveyed. Conclusion The mental health pharmacists support SDM for antipsychotic prescribing, believing that it improves outcomes. However, barriers are seen to limit implementation. More research is needed into overcoming the barriers and measuring the benefits of SDM, along with exploring a more inter-professional approach to SDM. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11096-016-0352-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-07-23 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5031729/ /pubmed/27450504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0352-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Younas, Mediha
Bradley, Eleanor
Holmes, Nikki
Sud, Dolly
Maidment, Ian D.
Mental health pharmacists views on shared decision-making for antipsychotics in serious mental illness
title Mental health pharmacists views on shared decision-making for antipsychotics in serious mental illness
title_full Mental health pharmacists views on shared decision-making for antipsychotics in serious mental illness
title_fullStr Mental health pharmacists views on shared decision-making for antipsychotics in serious mental illness
title_full_unstemmed Mental health pharmacists views on shared decision-making for antipsychotics in serious mental illness
title_short Mental health pharmacists views on shared decision-making for antipsychotics in serious mental illness
title_sort mental health pharmacists views on shared decision-making for antipsychotics in serious mental illness
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5031729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27450504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0352-z
work_keys_str_mv AT younasmediha mentalhealthpharmacistsviewsonshareddecisionmakingforantipsychoticsinseriousmentalillness
AT bradleyeleanor mentalhealthpharmacistsviewsonshareddecisionmakingforantipsychoticsinseriousmentalillness
AT holmesnikki mentalhealthpharmacistsviewsonshareddecisionmakingforantipsychoticsinseriousmentalillness
AT suddolly mentalhealthpharmacistsviewsonshareddecisionmakingforantipsychoticsinseriousmentalillness
AT maidmentiand mentalhealthpharmacistsviewsonshareddecisionmakingforantipsychoticsinseriousmentalillness