Cargando…

Evaluation of Light-Activated Provisional Resin Materials for Periodontal Soft Tissue Management

The purpose of this study was to determine mechanical properties using a compressive test with cylinder specimen (h = 6 mm and ϕ = 4 mm) as well as cytotoxicity using elutes from disk specimen (ϕ = 10 mm and h = 2 mm) against human gingival fibroblasts and oral keratinocytes with light-activated pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jun, Soo-Kyung, Lee, Hae-Hyoung, Lee, Jung-Hwan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5031816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27672651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1209705
_version_ 1782454864471654400
author Jun, Soo-Kyung
Lee, Hae-Hyoung
Lee, Jung-Hwan
author_facet Jun, Soo-Kyung
Lee, Hae-Hyoung
Lee, Jung-Hwan
author_sort Jun, Soo-Kyung
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to determine mechanical properties using a compressive test with cylinder specimen (h = 6 mm and ϕ = 4 mm) as well as cytotoxicity using elutes from disk specimen (ϕ = 10 mm and h = 2 mm) against human gingival fibroblasts and oral keratinocytes with light-activated provisional resin materials (Revotek LC and Luxatemp Solar) compared to chemically activated counterpart (Snap, Trim II, and Jet). Significantly increased compressive strength (210~280 MPa) was detected in light-activated products compared to chemically activated ones (20~65 MPa, P < 0.05) and similar compressive modulus was detected in both types (0.8~1.5 and 0.5~1.3 GPa). Simultaneously, the light-activated products showed less adverse effects on the periodontal soft tissue cells in any polymerization stage compared to the chemically activated products. Particularly, chemically activated products had significantly greater adverse effects during the “polymerizing” phase compared to those that were “already set” (P < 0.05), as shown in confocal microscopic images of live and dead cells. In conclusion, light-activated provisional resin materials have better mechanical properties as well as biocompatibility against two tested types of oral cells compared to the chemically activated counterpart, which are considered as more beneficial choice for periodontal soft tissue management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5031816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50318162016-09-26 Evaluation of Light-Activated Provisional Resin Materials for Periodontal Soft Tissue Management Jun, Soo-Kyung Lee, Hae-Hyoung Lee, Jung-Hwan Biomed Res Int Research Article The purpose of this study was to determine mechanical properties using a compressive test with cylinder specimen (h = 6 mm and ϕ = 4 mm) as well as cytotoxicity using elutes from disk specimen (ϕ = 10 mm and h = 2 mm) against human gingival fibroblasts and oral keratinocytes with light-activated provisional resin materials (Revotek LC and Luxatemp Solar) compared to chemically activated counterpart (Snap, Trim II, and Jet). Significantly increased compressive strength (210~280 MPa) was detected in light-activated products compared to chemically activated ones (20~65 MPa, P < 0.05) and similar compressive modulus was detected in both types (0.8~1.5 and 0.5~1.3 GPa). Simultaneously, the light-activated products showed less adverse effects on the periodontal soft tissue cells in any polymerization stage compared to the chemically activated products. Particularly, chemically activated products had significantly greater adverse effects during the “polymerizing” phase compared to those that were “already set” (P < 0.05), as shown in confocal microscopic images of live and dead cells. In conclusion, light-activated provisional resin materials have better mechanical properties as well as biocompatibility against two tested types of oral cells compared to the chemically activated counterpart, which are considered as more beneficial choice for periodontal soft tissue management. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5031816/ /pubmed/27672651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1209705 Text en Copyright © 2016 Soo-Kyung Jun et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jun, Soo-Kyung
Lee, Hae-Hyoung
Lee, Jung-Hwan
Evaluation of Light-Activated Provisional Resin Materials for Periodontal Soft Tissue Management
title Evaluation of Light-Activated Provisional Resin Materials for Periodontal Soft Tissue Management
title_full Evaluation of Light-Activated Provisional Resin Materials for Periodontal Soft Tissue Management
title_fullStr Evaluation of Light-Activated Provisional Resin Materials for Periodontal Soft Tissue Management
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Light-Activated Provisional Resin Materials for Periodontal Soft Tissue Management
title_short Evaluation of Light-Activated Provisional Resin Materials for Periodontal Soft Tissue Management
title_sort evaluation of light-activated provisional resin materials for periodontal soft tissue management
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5031816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27672651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1209705
work_keys_str_mv AT junsookyung evaluationoflightactivatedprovisionalresinmaterialsforperiodontalsofttissuemanagement
AT leehaehyoung evaluationoflightactivatedprovisionalresinmaterialsforperiodontalsofttissuemanagement
AT leejunghwan evaluationoflightactivatedprovisionalresinmaterialsforperiodontalsofttissuemanagement