Cargando…

Three-dimensional Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Response Assessment for Breast Cancer: A Comparison with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pathology

To compare the capabilities of three-dimensional contrast enhanced ultrasound (3D-CEUS) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (DCE-MRI) in predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) among breast cancer patients, 48 patients with unilateral breast cancer were recruited for 3...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jia, Wan-Ru, Tang, Lei, Wang, Deng-Bin, Chai, Wei-Min, Fei, Xiao-Chun, He, Jian-Rong, Chen, Man, Wang, Wen-Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5031978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27652518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep33832
_version_ 1782454898830344192
author Jia, Wan-Ru
Tang, Lei
Wang, Deng-Bin
Chai, Wei-Min
Fei, Xiao-Chun
He, Jian-Rong
Chen, Man
Wang, Wen-Ping
author_facet Jia, Wan-Ru
Tang, Lei
Wang, Deng-Bin
Chai, Wei-Min
Fei, Xiao-Chun
He, Jian-Rong
Chen, Man
Wang, Wen-Ping
author_sort Jia, Wan-Ru
collection PubMed
description To compare the capabilities of three-dimensional contrast enhanced ultrasound (3D-CEUS) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (DCE-MRI) in predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) among breast cancer patients, 48 patients with unilateral breast cancer were recruited for 3D-CEUS and DCE-MRI examinations both before and after NAC; pathology was used to validate the results. This study was approved by the institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained from each patient. Imaging feature changes and pathological vascularity response, including microvessel density (MVD) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), were calculated. Pathological complete response (pCR) and major histological response (MHR) were used as references. The 3D-CEUS score, DCE-MRI score, MVD and VEGF significantly decreased (P < 0.0001) after NAC. The correlations between Δ3D-CEUS and ΔDCE-MRI with pCR (r = 0.649, P < 0.0001; r = 0.639, P < 0.0001) and MHR (r = 0.863, P < 0.0001; r = 0.836, P < 0.0001) were significant. All scores showed significant differences between the pCR and non-pCR groups with folder changes of 0.1, 0.1, 2.4, and 2.3, respectively (P = 0.0001, <0.0001, <0.0001 and <0.0001). In conclusion, 3D-CEUS is effective in assessing the response of breast cancer patients undergoing NAC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5031978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50319782016-09-29 Three-dimensional Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Response Assessment for Breast Cancer: A Comparison with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pathology Jia, Wan-Ru Tang, Lei Wang, Deng-Bin Chai, Wei-Min Fei, Xiao-Chun He, Jian-Rong Chen, Man Wang, Wen-Ping Sci Rep Article To compare the capabilities of three-dimensional contrast enhanced ultrasound (3D-CEUS) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (DCE-MRI) in predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) among breast cancer patients, 48 patients with unilateral breast cancer were recruited for 3D-CEUS and DCE-MRI examinations both before and after NAC; pathology was used to validate the results. This study was approved by the institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained from each patient. Imaging feature changes and pathological vascularity response, including microvessel density (MVD) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), were calculated. Pathological complete response (pCR) and major histological response (MHR) were used as references. The 3D-CEUS score, DCE-MRI score, MVD and VEGF significantly decreased (P < 0.0001) after NAC. The correlations between Δ3D-CEUS and ΔDCE-MRI with pCR (r = 0.649, P < 0.0001; r = 0.639, P < 0.0001) and MHR (r = 0.863, P < 0.0001; r = 0.836, P < 0.0001) were significant. All scores showed significant differences between the pCR and non-pCR groups with folder changes of 0.1, 0.1, 2.4, and 2.3, respectively (P = 0.0001, <0.0001, <0.0001 and <0.0001). In conclusion, 3D-CEUS is effective in assessing the response of breast cancer patients undergoing NAC. Nature Publishing Group 2016-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5031978/ /pubmed/27652518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep33832 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Jia, Wan-Ru
Tang, Lei
Wang, Deng-Bin
Chai, Wei-Min
Fei, Xiao-Chun
He, Jian-Rong
Chen, Man
Wang, Wen-Ping
Three-dimensional Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Response Assessment for Breast Cancer: A Comparison with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pathology
title Three-dimensional Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Response Assessment for Breast Cancer: A Comparison with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pathology
title_full Three-dimensional Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Response Assessment for Breast Cancer: A Comparison with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pathology
title_fullStr Three-dimensional Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Response Assessment for Breast Cancer: A Comparison with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pathology
title_full_unstemmed Three-dimensional Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Response Assessment for Breast Cancer: A Comparison with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pathology
title_short Three-dimensional Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Response Assessment for Breast Cancer: A Comparison with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pathology
title_sort three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound in response assessment for breast cancer: a comparison with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and pathology
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5031978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27652518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep33832
work_keys_str_mv AT jiawanru threedimensionalcontrastenhancedultrasoundinresponseassessmentforbreastcanceracomparisonwithdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingandpathology
AT tanglei threedimensionalcontrastenhancedultrasoundinresponseassessmentforbreastcanceracomparisonwithdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingandpathology
AT wangdengbin threedimensionalcontrastenhancedultrasoundinresponseassessmentforbreastcanceracomparisonwithdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingandpathology
AT chaiweimin threedimensionalcontrastenhancedultrasoundinresponseassessmentforbreastcanceracomparisonwithdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingandpathology
AT feixiaochun threedimensionalcontrastenhancedultrasoundinresponseassessmentforbreastcanceracomparisonwithdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingandpathology
AT hejianrong threedimensionalcontrastenhancedultrasoundinresponseassessmentforbreastcanceracomparisonwithdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingandpathology
AT chenman threedimensionalcontrastenhancedultrasoundinresponseassessmentforbreastcanceracomparisonwithdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingandpathology
AT wangwenping threedimensionalcontrastenhancedultrasoundinresponseassessmentforbreastcanceracomparisonwithdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingandpathology