Cargando…
Quantification of Viral and Prokaryotic Production Rates in Benthic Ecosystems: A Methods Comparison
Viruses profoundly influence benthic marine ecosystems by infecting and subsequently killing their prokaryotic hosts, thereby impacting the cycling of carbon and nutrients. Previously conducted studies, based on different methodologies, have provided widely differing estimates of the relevance of vi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5032637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27713739 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01501 |
_version_ | 1782455035408416768 |
---|---|
author | Rastelli, Eugenio Dell’Anno, Antonio Corinaldesi, Cinzia Middelboe, Mathias Noble, Rachel T. Danovaro, Roberto |
author_facet | Rastelli, Eugenio Dell’Anno, Antonio Corinaldesi, Cinzia Middelboe, Mathias Noble, Rachel T. Danovaro, Roberto |
author_sort | Rastelli, Eugenio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Viruses profoundly influence benthic marine ecosystems by infecting and subsequently killing their prokaryotic hosts, thereby impacting the cycling of carbon and nutrients. Previously conducted studies, based on different methodologies, have provided widely differing estimates of the relevance of viruses on benthic prokaryotes. There has been no attempt so far to compare these independent approaches, including contextual comparisons among different approaches for sample manipulation (i.e., dilution or not of the sediments during incubations), between methods based on epifluorescence microscopy (EFM) or radiotracers, and between the use of different radiotracers. Therefore, it has been difficult to identify the most suitable methodologies and protocols to be used as standard approaches for the quantification of viral infections of prokaryotes. Here, we compared for the first time different methods for determining viral and prokaryotic production rates in marine sediments collected at two benthic sites, differing in depth and environmental conditions. We used a highly replicated experimental design, testing the potential biases associated to the incubation of sediments as diluted or undiluted. In parallel, we also compared EFM counts with the (3)H-thymidine incubations for the determination of viral production rates, and the use of (3)H-thymidine versus (3)H-leucine radiotracers for the determination of prokaryotic production. We show here that, independent from sediment dilution, EFM-based values of viral production ranged from 1.4 to 4.6 × 10(7) viruses g(-1) h(-1), and were similar but overall less variable compared to those obtained by the (3)H-thymidine method (0.3 to 9.0 × 10(7) viruses g(-1)h(-1)). In addition, the prokaryotic production rates were not affected by sediment dilution, and the use of different radiotracers provided very consistent estimates (10.3–35.1 and 9.3–34.6 ngC g(-1)h(-1) using the (3)H-thymidine or (3)H-leucine method, respectively). These results indicated that viral lysis was responsible for the abatement of 55–81% of the prokaryotic heterotrophic production, corroborating previous findings of the major role of viruses in benthic deep-sea ecosystems. Moreover, our methodological comparison for the analysis of viral production in marine sediments suggests that microscopy-based approaches are simpler and more cost-effective than those based on radiotracers. These approaches also reduce time to results and overcome issues related to generation of radioactive waste. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5032637 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50326372016-10-06 Quantification of Viral and Prokaryotic Production Rates in Benthic Ecosystems: A Methods Comparison Rastelli, Eugenio Dell’Anno, Antonio Corinaldesi, Cinzia Middelboe, Mathias Noble, Rachel T. Danovaro, Roberto Front Microbiol Microbiology Viruses profoundly influence benthic marine ecosystems by infecting and subsequently killing their prokaryotic hosts, thereby impacting the cycling of carbon and nutrients. Previously conducted studies, based on different methodologies, have provided widely differing estimates of the relevance of viruses on benthic prokaryotes. There has been no attempt so far to compare these independent approaches, including contextual comparisons among different approaches for sample manipulation (i.e., dilution or not of the sediments during incubations), between methods based on epifluorescence microscopy (EFM) or radiotracers, and between the use of different radiotracers. Therefore, it has been difficult to identify the most suitable methodologies and protocols to be used as standard approaches for the quantification of viral infections of prokaryotes. Here, we compared for the first time different methods for determining viral and prokaryotic production rates in marine sediments collected at two benthic sites, differing in depth and environmental conditions. We used a highly replicated experimental design, testing the potential biases associated to the incubation of sediments as diluted or undiluted. In parallel, we also compared EFM counts with the (3)H-thymidine incubations for the determination of viral production rates, and the use of (3)H-thymidine versus (3)H-leucine radiotracers for the determination of prokaryotic production. We show here that, independent from sediment dilution, EFM-based values of viral production ranged from 1.4 to 4.6 × 10(7) viruses g(-1) h(-1), and were similar but overall less variable compared to those obtained by the (3)H-thymidine method (0.3 to 9.0 × 10(7) viruses g(-1)h(-1)). In addition, the prokaryotic production rates were not affected by sediment dilution, and the use of different radiotracers provided very consistent estimates (10.3–35.1 and 9.3–34.6 ngC g(-1)h(-1) using the (3)H-thymidine or (3)H-leucine method, respectively). These results indicated that viral lysis was responsible for the abatement of 55–81% of the prokaryotic heterotrophic production, corroborating previous findings of the major role of viruses in benthic deep-sea ecosystems. Moreover, our methodological comparison for the analysis of viral production in marine sediments suggests that microscopy-based approaches are simpler and more cost-effective than those based on radiotracers. These approaches also reduce time to results and overcome issues related to generation of radioactive waste. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5032637/ /pubmed/27713739 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01501 Text en Copyright © 2016 Rastelli, Dell’Anno, Corinaldesi, Middelboe, Noble and Danovaro. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Rastelli, Eugenio Dell’Anno, Antonio Corinaldesi, Cinzia Middelboe, Mathias Noble, Rachel T. Danovaro, Roberto Quantification of Viral and Prokaryotic Production Rates in Benthic Ecosystems: A Methods Comparison |
title | Quantification of Viral and Prokaryotic Production Rates in Benthic Ecosystems: A Methods Comparison |
title_full | Quantification of Viral and Prokaryotic Production Rates in Benthic Ecosystems: A Methods Comparison |
title_fullStr | Quantification of Viral and Prokaryotic Production Rates in Benthic Ecosystems: A Methods Comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantification of Viral and Prokaryotic Production Rates in Benthic Ecosystems: A Methods Comparison |
title_short | Quantification of Viral and Prokaryotic Production Rates in Benthic Ecosystems: A Methods Comparison |
title_sort | quantification of viral and prokaryotic production rates in benthic ecosystems: a methods comparison |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5032637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27713739 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01501 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rastellieugenio quantificationofviralandprokaryoticproductionratesinbenthicecosystemsamethodscomparison AT dellannoantonio quantificationofviralandprokaryoticproductionratesinbenthicecosystemsamethodscomparison AT corinaldesicinzia quantificationofviralandprokaryoticproductionratesinbenthicecosystemsamethodscomparison AT middelboemathias quantificationofviralandprokaryoticproductionratesinbenthicecosystemsamethodscomparison AT noblerachelt quantificationofviralandprokaryoticproductionratesinbenthicecosystemsamethodscomparison AT danovaroroberto quantificationofviralandprokaryoticproductionratesinbenthicecosystemsamethodscomparison |