Cargando…

Ontario's Emergency Department Process Improvement Program: The Experience of Implementation

OBJECTIVES: In recent years, Lean manufacturing principles have been applied to health care quality improvement efforts to improve wait times. In Ontario, an emergency department (ED) process improvement program based on Lean principles was introduced by the Ministry of Health and Long‐Term Care as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rotteau, Leahora, Webster, Fiona, Salkeld, Erin, Hellings, Chelsea, Guttmann, Astrid, Vermeulen, Marian J., Bell, Robert S., Zwarenstein, Merrick, Rowe, Brian H., Nigam, Amit, Schull, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5032978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25996451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.12688
_version_ 1782455089201414144
author Rotteau, Leahora
Webster, Fiona
Salkeld, Erin
Hellings, Chelsea
Guttmann, Astrid
Vermeulen, Marian J.
Bell, Robert S.
Zwarenstein, Merrick
Rowe, Brian H.
Nigam, Amit
Schull, Michael J.
author_facet Rotteau, Leahora
Webster, Fiona
Salkeld, Erin
Hellings, Chelsea
Guttmann, Astrid
Vermeulen, Marian J.
Bell, Robert S.
Zwarenstein, Merrick
Rowe, Brian H.
Nigam, Amit
Schull, Michael J.
author_sort Rotteau, Leahora
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In recent years, Lean manufacturing principles have been applied to health care quality improvement efforts to improve wait times. In Ontario, an emergency department (ED) process improvement program based on Lean principles was introduced by the Ministry of Health and Long‐Term Care as part of a strategy to reduce ED length of stay (LOS) and to improve patient flow. This article aims to describe the hospital‐based teams’ experiences during the ED process improvement program implementation and the teams’ perceptions of the key factors that influenced the program's success or failure. METHODS: A qualitative evaluation was conducted based on semistructured interviews with hospital implementation team members, such as team leads, medical leads, and executive sponsors, at 10 purposively selected hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Sites were selected based, in part, on their changes in median ED LOS following the implementation period. A thematic framework approach as used for interviews, and a standard thematic coding framework was developed. RESULTS: Twenty‐four interviews were coded and analyzed. The results are organized according to participants’ experience and are grouped into four themes that were identified as significantly affecting the implementation experience: local contextual factors, relationship between improvement team and support players, staff engagement, and success and sustainability. The results demonstrate the importance of the context of implementation, establishing strong relationships and communication strategies, and preparing for implementation and sustainability prior to the start of the project. CONCLUSIONS: Several key factors were identified as important to the success of the program, such as preparing for implementation, ensuring strong executive support, creation of implementation teams based on the tasks and outcomes of the initiative, and using multiple communication strategies throughout the implementation process. Explicit incorporation of these factors into the development and implementation of future similar interventions in health care settings could be useful.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5032978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50329782016-10-03 Ontario's Emergency Department Process Improvement Program: The Experience of Implementation Rotteau, Leahora Webster, Fiona Salkeld, Erin Hellings, Chelsea Guttmann, Astrid Vermeulen, Marian J. Bell, Robert S. Zwarenstein, Merrick Rowe, Brian H. Nigam, Amit Schull, Michael J. Acad Emerg Med Original Contributions OBJECTIVES: In recent years, Lean manufacturing principles have been applied to health care quality improvement efforts to improve wait times. In Ontario, an emergency department (ED) process improvement program based on Lean principles was introduced by the Ministry of Health and Long‐Term Care as part of a strategy to reduce ED length of stay (LOS) and to improve patient flow. This article aims to describe the hospital‐based teams’ experiences during the ED process improvement program implementation and the teams’ perceptions of the key factors that influenced the program's success or failure. METHODS: A qualitative evaluation was conducted based on semistructured interviews with hospital implementation team members, such as team leads, medical leads, and executive sponsors, at 10 purposively selected hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Sites were selected based, in part, on their changes in median ED LOS following the implementation period. A thematic framework approach as used for interviews, and a standard thematic coding framework was developed. RESULTS: Twenty‐four interviews were coded and analyzed. The results are organized according to participants’ experience and are grouped into four themes that were identified as significantly affecting the implementation experience: local contextual factors, relationship between improvement team and support players, staff engagement, and success and sustainability. The results demonstrate the importance of the context of implementation, establishing strong relationships and communication strategies, and preparing for implementation and sustainability prior to the start of the project. CONCLUSIONS: Several key factors were identified as important to the success of the program, such as preparing for implementation, ensuring strong executive support, creation of implementation teams based on the tasks and outcomes of the initiative, and using multiple communication strategies throughout the implementation process. Explicit incorporation of these factors into the development and implementation of future similar interventions in health care settings could be useful. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-06 2015-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5032978/ /pubmed/25996451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.12688 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Academic Emergency Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Contributions
Rotteau, Leahora
Webster, Fiona
Salkeld, Erin
Hellings, Chelsea
Guttmann, Astrid
Vermeulen, Marian J.
Bell, Robert S.
Zwarenstein, Merrick
Rowe, Brian H.
Nigam, Amit
Schull, Michael J.
Ontario's Emergency Department Process Improvement Program: The Experience of Implementation
title Ontario's Emergency Department Process Improvement Program: The Experience of Implementation
title_full Ontario's Emergency Department Process Improvement Program: The Experience of Implementation
title_fullStr Ontario's Emergency Department Process Improvement Program: The Experience of Implementation
title_full_unstemmed Ontario's Emergency Department Process Improvement Program: The Experience of Implementation
title_short Ontario's Emergency Department Process Improvement Program: The Experience of Implementation
title_sort ontario's emergency department process improvement program: the experience of implementation
topic Original Contributions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5032978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25996451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.12688
work_keys_str_mv AT rotteauleahora ontariosemergencydepartmentprocessimprovementprogramtheexperienceofimplementation
AT websterfiona ontariosemergencydepartmentprocessimprovementprogramtheexperienceofimplementation
AT salkelderin ontariosemergencydepartmentprocessimprovementprogramtheexperienceofimplementation
AT hellingschelsea ontariosemergencydepartmentprocessimprovementprogramtheexperienceofimplementation
AT guttmannastrid ontariosemergencydepartmentprocessimprovementprogramtheexperienceofimplementation
AT vermeulenmarianj ontariosemergencydepartmentprocessimprovementprogramtheexperienceofimplementation
AT bellroberts ontariosemergencydepartmentprocessimprovementprogramtheexperienceofimplementation
AT zwarensteinmerrick ontariosemergencydepartmentprocessimprovementprogramtheexperienceofimplementation
AT rowebrianh ontariosemergencydepartmentprocessimprovementprogramtheexperienceofimplementation
AT nigamamit ontariosemergencydepartmentprocessimprovementprogramtheexperienceofimplementation
AT schullmichaelj ontariosemergencydepartmentprocessimprovementprogramtheexperienceofimplementation
AT ontariosemergencydepartmentprocessimprovementprogramtheexperienceofimplementation