Cargando…
Ontario's Emergency Department Process Improvement Program: The Experience of Implementation
OBJECTIVES: In recent years, Lean manufacturing principles have been applied to health care quality improvement efforts to improve wait times. In Ontario, an emergency department (ED) process improvement program based on Lean principles was introduced by the Ministry of Health and Long‐Term Care as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5032978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25996451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.12688 |
_version_ | 1782455089201414144 |
---|---|
author | Rotteau, Leahora Webster, Fiona Salkeld, Erin Hellings, Chelsea Guttmann, Astrid Vermeulen, Marian J. Bell, Robert S. Zwarenstein, Merrick Rowe, Brian H. Nigam, Amit Schull, Michael J. |
author_facet | Rotteau, Leahora Webster, Fiona Salkeld, Erin Hellings, Chelsea Guttmann, Astrid Vermeulen, Marian J. Bell, Robert S. Zwarenstein, Merrick Rowe, Brian H. Nigam, Amit Schull, Michael J. |
author_sort | Rotteau, Leahora |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: In recent years, Lean manufacturing principles have been applied to health care quality improvement efforts to improve wait times. In Ontario, an emergency department (ED) process improvement program based on Lean principles was introduced by the Ministry of Health and Long‐Term Care as part of a strategy to reduce ED length of stay (LOS) and to improve patient flow. This article aims to describe the hospital‐based teams’ experiences during the ED process improvement program implementation and the teams’ perceptions of the key factors that influenced the program's success or failure. METHODS: A qualitative evaluation was conducted based on semistructured interviews with hospital implementation team members, such as team leads, medical leads, and executive sponsors, at 10 purposively selected hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Sites were selected based, in part, on their changes in median ED LOS following the implementation period. A thematic framework approach as used for interviews, and a standard thematic coding framework was developed. RESULTS: Twenty‐four interviews were coded and analyzed. The results are organized according to participants’ experience and are grouped into four themes that were identified as significantly affecting the implementation experience: local contextual factors, relationship between improvement team and support players, staff engagement, and success and sustainability. The results demonstrate the importance of the context of implementation, establishing strong relationships and communication strategies, and preparing for implementation and sustainability prior to the start of the project. CONCLUSIONS: Several key factors were identified as important to the success of the program, such as preparing for implementation, ensuring strong executive support, creation of implementation teams based on the tasks and outcomes of the initiative, and using multiple communication strategies throughout the implementation process. Explicit incorporation of these factors into the development and implementation of future similar interventions in health care settings could be useful. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5032978 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50329782016-10-03 Ontario's Emergency Department Process Improvement Program: The Experience of Implementation Rotteau, Leahora Webster, Fiona Salkeld, Erin Hellings, Chelsea Guttmann, Astrid Vermeulen, Marian J. Bell, Robert S. Zwarenstein, Merrick Rowe, Brian H. Nigam, Amit Schull, Michael J. Acad Emerg Med Original Contributions OBJECTIVES: In recent years, Lean manufacturing principles have been applied to health care quality improvement efforts to improve wait times. In Ontario, an emergency department (ED) process improvement program based on Lean principles was introduced by the Ministry of Health and Long‐Term Care as part of a strategy to reduce ED length of stay (LOS) and to improve patient flow. This article aims to describe the hospital‐based teams’ experiences during the ED process improvement program implementation and the teams’ perceptions of the key factors that influenced the program's success or failure. METHODS: A qualitative evaluation was conducted based on semistructured interviews with hospital implementation team members, such as team leads, medical leads, and executive sponsors, at 10 purposively selected hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Sites were selected based, in part, on their changes in median ED LOS following the implementation period. A thematic framework approach as used for interviews, and a standard thematic coding framework was developed. RESULTS: Twenty‐four interviews were coded and analyzed. The results are organized according to participants’ experience and are grouped into four themes that were identified as significantly affecting the implementation experience: local contextual factors, relationship between improvement team and support players, staff engagement, and success and sustainability. The results demonstrate the importance of the context of implementation, establishing strong relationships and communication strategies, and preparing for implementation and sustainability prior to the start of the project. CONCLUSIONS: Several key factors were identified as important to the success of the program, such as preparing for implementation, ensuring strong executive support, creation of implementation teams based on the tasks and outcomes of the initiative, and using multiple communication strategies throughout the implementation process. Explicit incorporation of these factors into the development and implementation of future similar interventions in health care settings could be useful. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-06 2015-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5032978/ /pubmed/25996451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.12688 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Academic Emergency Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Contributions Rotteau, Leahora Webster, Fiona Salkeld, Erin Hellings, Chelsea Guttmann, Astrid Vermeulen, Marian J. Bell, Robert S. Zwarenstein, Merrick Rowe, Brian H. Nigam, Amit Schull, Michael J. Ontario's Emergency Department Process Improvement Program: The Experience of Implementation |
title | Ontario's Emergency Department Process Improvement Program: The Experience of Implementation |
title_full | Ontario's Emergency Department Process Improvement Program: The Experience of Implementation |
title_fullStr | Ontario's Emergency Department Process Improvement Program: The Experience of Implementation |
title_full_unstemmed | Ontario's Emergency Department Process Improvement Program: The Experience of Implementation |
title_short | Ontario's Emergency Department Process Improvement Program: The Experience of Implementation |
title_sort | ontario's emergency department process improvement program: the experience of implementation |
topic | Original Contributions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5032978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25996451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.12688 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rotteauleahora ontariosemergencydepartmentprocessimprovementprogramtheexperienceofimplementation AT websterfiona ontariosemergencydepartmentprocessimprovementprogramtheexperienceofimplementation AT salkelderin ontariosemergencydepartmentprocessimprovementprogramtheexperienceofimplementation AT hellingschelsea ontariosemergencydepartmentprocessimprovementprogramtheexperienceofimplementation AT guttmannastrid ontariosemergencydepartmentprocessimprovementprogramtheexperienceofimplementation AT vermeulenmarianj ontariosemergencydepartmentprocessimprovementprogramtheexperienceofimplementation AT bellroberts ontariosemergencydepartmentprocessimprovementprogramtheexperienceofimplementation AT zwarensteinmerrick ontariosemergencydepartmentprocessimprovementprogramtheexperienceofimplementation AT rowebrianh ontariosemergencydepartmentprocessimprovementprogramtheexperienceofimplementation AT nigamamit ontariosemergencydepartmentprocessimprovementprogramtheexperienceofimplementation AT schullmichaelj ontariosemergencydepartmentprocessimprovementprogramtheexperienceofimplementation AT ontariosemergencydepartmentprocessimprovementprogramtheexperienceofimplementation |