Cargando…

The Stepwise Approach to Diabetes Prevention: Results From the D-CLIP Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE: This study tests the effectiveness of expert guidelines for diabetes prevention: lifestyle intervention with addition of metformin, when required, among people with prediabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The Diabetes Community Lifestyle Improvement Program (D-CLIP) is a randomized, con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weber, Mary Beth, Ranjani, Harish, Staimez, Lisa R., Anjana, Ranjit M., Ali, Mohammed K., Narayan, K.M. Venkat, Mohan, Viswanathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5033082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27504014
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc16-1241
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: This study tests the effectiveness of expert guidelines for diabetes prevention: lifestyle intervention with addition of metformin, when required, among people with prediabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The Diabetes Community Lifestyle Improvement Program (D-CLIP) is a randomized, controlled, translation trial of 578 overweight/obese Asian Indian adults with isolated impaired glucose tolerance (iIGT), isolated impaired fasting glucose (iIFG), or IFG+IGT in Chennai, India. Eligible individuals were identified through community-based recruitment and randomized to standard lifestyle advice (control) or a 6-month, culturally tailored, U.S. Diabetes Prevention Program–based lifestyle curriculum plus stepwise addition of metformin (500 mg, twice daily) for participants at highest risk of conversion to diabetes at ≥4 months of follow-up. The primary outcome, diabetes incidence, was assessed biannually and compared across study arms using an intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: During 3 years of follow-up, 34.9% of control and 25.7% of intervention participants developed diabetes (P = 0.014); the relative risk reduction (RRR) was 32% (95% CI 7–50), and the number needed to treat to prevent one case of diabetes was 9.8. The RRR varied by prediabetes type (IFG+IGT, 36%; iIGT, 31%; iIFG, 12%; P = 0.77) and was stronger in participants 50 years or older, male, or obese. Most participants (72.0%) required metformin in addition to lifestyle, although there was variability by prediabetes type (iIFG, 76.5%; IFG+IGT, 83.0%; iIGT, 51.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Stepwise diabetes prevention in people with prediabetes can effectively reduce diabetes incidence by a third in community settings; however, people with iIFG may require different interventions.