Cargando…

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Insertion/Deletion Polymorphism and Susceptibility to Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Case-Control Study and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Studies of angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion (ACE I/D) polymorphisms and the risks of knee osteoarthritis (OA) have yielded conflicting results. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between ACE I/D and knee OA, we conducted a combined case-control study and meta-analysi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Chin, Chen, Hsiang-Cheng, Fang, Wen-Hui, Wang, Chih-Chien, Peng, Yi-Jen, Lee, Herng-Sheng, Chang, Hung, Chu, Chi-Ming, Huang, Guo-Shu, Chen, Wei-Teing, Tsai, Yu-Jui, Lin, Hong-Ling, Lin, Fu-Huang, Su, Sui-Lung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5033346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27657933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161754
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Studies of angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion (ACE I/D) polymorphisms and the risks of knee osteoarthritis (OA) have yielded conflicting results. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between ACE I/D and knee OA, we conducted a combined case-control study and meta-analysis. METHODS: For the case-control study, 447 knee OA cases and 423 healthy controls were recruited between March 2010 and July 2011. Knee OA cases were defined using the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system, and the ACE I/D genotype was determined using a standard polymerase chain reaction. The association between ACE I/D and knee OA was detected using allele, genotype, dominant, and recessive models. For the meta-analysis, PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched for prospective observational studies published up until August 2015. Studies of ACE I/D and knee OA with sufficient data were selected. Pooled results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the D versus I allele with regard to knee OA risk. RESULTS: We found no significant association between the D allele and knee OA [OR: 1.09 (95% CI: 0.76–1.89)] in the present case-control study, and the results of other genetic models were also nonsignificant. Five current studies were included, and there were a total of six study populations after including our case-control study (1165 cases and 1029 controls). In the meta-analysis, the allele model also yielded nonsignificant results [OR: 1.37 (95% CI: 0.95–1.99)] and a high heterogeneity (I(2): 87.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The association between ACE I/D and knee OA tended to yield negative results. High heterogeneity suggests a complex, multifactorial mechanism, and an epistasis analysis of ACE I/D and knee OA should therefore be conducted.