Cargando…
Standardized Reporting of Prostate MRI: Comparison of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 1 and Version 2
INTRODUCTION: Objective of our study was to determine the agreement between version 1 (v1) and v2 of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for evaluation of multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) and to compare their diagnostic accuracy, their inter-observer agreement and practicabi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5033350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27657729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162879 |
_version_ | 1782455125742190592 |
---|---|
author | Tewes, Susanne Mokov, Nikolaj Hartung, Dagmar Schick, Volker Peters, Inga Schedl, Peter Pertschy, Stefanie Wacker, Frank Voshage, Götz Hueper, Katja |
author_facet | Tewes, Susanne Mokov, Nikolaj Hartung, Dagmar Schick, Volker Peters, Inga Schedl, Peter Pertschy, Stefanie Wacker, Frank Voshage, Götz Hueper, Katja |
author_sort | Tewes, Susanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Objective of our study was to determine the agreement between version 1 (v1) and v2 of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for evaluation of multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) and to compare their diagnostic accuracy, their inter-observer agreement and practicability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: mpMRI including T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging (DCE) of 54 consecutive patients, who subsequently underwent MRI-guided in-bore biopsy were re-analyzed according to PI-RADS v1 and v2 by two independent readers. Diagnostic accuracy for detection of prostate cancer (PCa) was assessed using ROC-curve analysis. Agreement between PI-RADS versions and observers was calculated and the time needed for scoring was determined. RESULTS: MRI-guided biopsy revealed PCa in 31 patients. Diagnostic accuracy for detection of PCa was equivalent with both PI-RADS versions for reader 1 with sensitivities and specificities of 84%/91% (AUC = 0.91 95%CI[0.8–1]) for PI-RADS v1 and 100%/74% (AUC = 0.92 95% CI[0.8–1]) for PI-RADS v2. Reader 2 achieved similar diagnostic accuracy with sensitivity and specificity of 74%/91% (AUC = 0.88 95%CI[0.8–1]) for PI-RADS v1 and 81%/91% (AUC = 0.91 95%CI[0.8–1]) for PI-RADS v2. Agreement between scores determined with different PI-RADS versions was good (reader 1: κ = 0.62, reader 2: κ = 0.64). Inter-observer agreement was moderate with PI-RADS v2 (κ = 0.56) and fair with v1 (κ = 0.39). The time required for building the PI-RADS score was significantly lower with PI-RADS v2 compared to v1 (24.7±2.3 s vs. 41.9±2.6 s, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Agreement between PI-RADS versions was high and both versions revealed high diagnostic accuracy for detection of PCa. Due to better inter-observer agreement for malignant lesions and less time demand, the new PI-RADS version could be more practicable for clinical routine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5033350 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50333502016-10-10 Standardized Reporting of Prostate MRI: Comparison of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 1 and Version 2 Tewes, Susanne Mokov, Nikolaj Hartung, Dagmar Schick, Volker Peters, Inga Schedl, Peter Pertschy, Stefanie Wacker, Frank Voshage, Götz Hueper, Katja PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Objective of our study was to determine the agreement between version 1 (v1) and v2 of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for evaluation of multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) and to compare their diagnostic accuracy, their inter-observer agreement and practicability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: mpMRI including T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging (DCE) of 54 consecutive patients, who subsequently underwent MRI-guided in-bore biopsy were re-analyzed according to PI-RADS v1 and v2 by two independent readers. Diagnostic accuracy for detection of prostate cancer (PCa) was assessed using ROC-curve analysis. Agreement between PI-RADS versions and observers was calculated and the time needed for scoring was determined. RESULTS: MRI-guided biopsy revealed PCa in 31 patients. Diagnostic accuracy for detection of PCa was equivalent with both PI-RADS versions for reader 1 with sensitivities and specificities of 84%/91% (AUC = 0.91 95%CI[0.8–1]) for PI-RADS v1 and 100%/74% (AUC = 0.92 95% CI[0.8–1]) for PI-RADS v2. Reader 2 achieved similar diagnostic accuracy with sensitivity and specificity of 74%/91% (AUC = 0.88 95%CI[0.8–1]) for PI-RADS v1 and 81%/91% (AUC = 0.91 95%CI[0.8–1]) for PI-RADS v2. Agreement between scores determined with different PI-RADS versions was good (reader 1: κ = 0.62, reader 2: κ = 0.64). Inter-observer agreement was moderate with PI-RADS v2 (κ = 0.56) and fair with v1 (κ = 0.39). The time required for building the PI-RADS score was significantly lower with PI-RADS v2 compared to v1 (24.7±2.3 s vs. 41.9±2.6 s, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Agreement between PI-RADS versions was high and both versions revealed high diagnostic accuracy for detection of PCa. Due to better inter-observer agreement for malignant lesions and less time demand, the new PI-RADS version could be more practicable for clinical routine. Public Library of Science 2016-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5033350/ /pubmed/27657729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162879 Text en © 2016 Tewes et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tewes, Susanne Mokov, Nikolaj Hartung, Dagmar Schick, Volker Peters, Inga Schedl, Peter Pertschy, Stefanie Wacker, Frank Voshage, Götz Hueper, Katja Standardized Reporting of Prostate MRI: Comparison of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 1 and Version 2 |
title | Standardized Reporting of Prostate MRI: Comparison of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 1 and Version 2 |
title_full | Standardized Reporting of Prostate MRI: Comparison of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 1 and Version 2 |
title_fullStr | Standardized Reporting of Prostate MRI: Comparison of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 1 and Version 2 |
title_full_unstemmed | Standardized Reporting of Prostate MRI: Comparison of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 1 and Version 2 |
title_short | Standardized Reporting of Prostate MRI: Comparison of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 1 and Version 2 |
title_sort | standardized reporting of prostate mri: comparison of the prostate imaging reporting and data system (pi-rads) version 1 and version 2 |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5033350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27657729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162879 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tewessusanne standardizedreportingofprostatemricomparisonoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsversion1andversion2 AT mokovnikolaj standardizedreportingofprostatemricomparisonoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsversion1andversion2 AT hartungdagmar standardizedreportingofprostatemricomparisonoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsversion1andversion2 AT schickvolker standardizedreportingofprostatemricomparisonoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsversion1andversion2 AT petersinga standardizedreportingofprostatemricomparisonoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsversion1andversion2 AT schedlpeter standardizedreportingofprostatemricomparisonoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsversion1andversion2 AT pertschystefanie standardizedreportingofprostatemricomparisonoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsversion1andversion2 AT wackerfrank standardizedreportingofprostatemricomparisonoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsversion1andversion2 AT voshagegotz standardizedreportingofprostatemricomparisonoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsversion1andversion2 AT hueperkatja standardizedreportingofprostatemricomparisonoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsversion1andversion2 |