Cargando…

Standardized Reporting of Prostate MRI: Comparison of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 1 and Version 2

INTRODUCTION: Objective of our study was to determine the agreement between version 1 (v1) and v2 of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for evaluation of multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) and to compare their diagnostic accuracy, their inter-observer agreement and practicabi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tewes, Susanne, Mokov, Nikolaj, Hartung, Dagmar, Schick, Volker, Peters, Inga, Schedl, Peter, Pertschy, Stefanie, Wacker, Frank, Voshage, Götz, Hueper, Katja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5033350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27657729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162879
_version_ 1782455125742190592
author Tewes, Susanne
Mokov, Nikolaj
Hartung, Dagmar
Schick, Volker
Peters, Inga
Schedl, Peter
Pertschy, Stefanie
Wacker, Frank
Voshage, Götz
Hueper, Katja
author_facet Tewes, Susanne
Mokov, Nikolaj
Hartung, Dagmar
Schick, Volker
Peters, Inga
Schedl, Peter
Pertschy, Stefanie
Wacker, Frank
Voshage, Götz
Hueper, Katja
author_sort Tewes, Susanne
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Objective of our study was to determine the agreement between version 1 (v1) and v2 of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for evaluation of multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) and to compare their diagnostic accuracy, their inter-observer agreement and practicability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: mpMRI including T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging (DCE) of 54 consecutive patients, who subsequently underwent MRI-guided in-bore biopsy were re-analyzed according to PI-RADS v1 and v2 by two independent readers. Diagnostic accuracy for detection of prostate cancer (PCa) was assessed using ROC-curve analysis. Agreement between PI-RADS versions and observers was calculated and the time needed for scoring was determined. RESULTS: MRI-guided biopsy revealed PCa in 31 patients. Diagnostic accuracy for detection of PCa was equivalent with both PI-RADS versions for reader 1 with sensitivities and specificities of 84%/91% (AUC = 0.91 95%CI[0.8–1]) for PI-RADS v1 and 100%/74% (AUC = 0.92 95% CI[0.8–1]) for PI-RADS v2. Reader 2 achieved similar diagnostic accuracy with sensitivity and specificity of 74%/91% (AUC = 0.88 95%CI[0.8–1]) for PI-RADS v1 and 81%/91% (AUC = 0.91 95%CI[0.8–1]) for PI-RADS v2. Agreement between scores determined with different PI-RADS versions was good (reader 1: κ = 0.62, reader 2: κ = 0.64). Inter-observer agreement was moderate with PI-RADS v2 (κ = 0.56) and fair with v1 (κ = 0.39). The time required for building the PI-RADS score was significantly lower with PI-RADS v2 compared to v1 (24.7±2.3 s vs. 41.9±2.6 s, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Agreement between PI-RADS versions was high and both versions revealed high diagnostic accuracy for detection of PCa. Due to better inter-observer agreement for malignant lesions and less time demand, the new PI-RADS version could be more practicable for clinical routine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5033350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50333502016-10-10 Standardized Reporting of Prostate MRI: Comparison of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 1 and Version 2 Tewes, Susanne Mokov, Nikolaj Hartung, Dagmar Schick, Volker Peters, Inga Schedl, Peter Pertschy, Stefanie Wacker, Frank Voshage, Götz Hueper, Katja PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Objective of our study was to determine the agreement between version 1 (v1) and v2 of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for evaluation of multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) and to compare their diagnostic accuracy, their inter-observer agreement and practicability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: mpMRI including T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging (DCE) of 54 consecutive patients, who subsequently underwent MRI-guided in-bore biopsy were re-analyzed according to PI-RADS v1 and v2 by two independent readers. Diagnostic accuracy for detection of prostate cancer (PCa) was assessed using ROC-curve analysis. Agreement between PI-RADS versions and observers was calculated and the time needed for scoring was determined. RESULTS: MRI-guided biopsy revealed PCa in 31 patients. Diagnostic accuracy for detection of PCa was equivalent with both PI-RADS versions for reader 1 with sensitivities and specificities of 84%/91% (AUC = 0.91 95%CI[0.8–1]) for PI-RADS v1 and 100%/74% (AUC = 0.92 95% CI[0.8–1]) for PI-RADS v2. Reader 2 achieved similar diagnostic accuracy with sensitivity and specificity of 74%/91% (AUC = 0.88 95%CI[0.8–1]) for PI-RADS v1 and 81%/91% (AUC = 0.91 95%CI[0.8–1]) for PI-RADS v2. Agreement between scores determined with different PI-RADS versions was good (reader 1: κ = 0.62, reader 2: κ = 0.64). Inter-observer agreement was moderate with PI-RADS v2 (κ = 0.56) and fair with v1 (κ = 0.39). The time required for building the PI-RADS score was significantly lower with PI-RADS v2 compared to v1 (24.7±2.3 s vs. 41.9±2.6 s, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Agreement between PI-RADS versions was high and both versions revealed high diagnostic accuracy for detection of PCa. Due to better inter-observer agreement for malignant lesions and less time demand, the new PI-RADS version could be more practicable for clinical routine. Public Library of Science 2016-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5033350/ /pubmed/27657729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162879 Text en © 2016 Tewes et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tewes, Susanne
Mokov, Nikolaj
Hartung, Dagmar
Schick, Volker
Peters, Inga
Schedl, Peter
Pertschy, Stefanie
Wacker, Frank
Voshage, Götz
Hueper, Katja
Standardized Reporting of Prostate MRI: Comparison of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 1 and Version 2
title Standardized Reporting of Prostate MRI: Comparison of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 1 and Version 2
title_full Standardized Reporting of Prostate MRI: Comparison of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 1 and Version 2
title_fullStr Standardized Reporting of Prostate MRI: Comparison of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 1 and Version 2
title_full_unstemmed Standardized Reporting of Prostate MRI: Comparison of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 1 and Version 2
title_short Standardized Reporting of Prostate MRI: Comparison of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 1 and Version 2
title_sort standardized reporting of prostate mri: comparison of the prostate imaging reporting and data system (pi-rads) version 1 and version 2
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5033350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27657729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162879
work_keys_str_mv AT tewessusanne standardizedreportingofprostatemricomparisonoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsversion1andversion2
AT mokovnikolaj standardizedreportingofprostatemricomparisonoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsversion1andversion2
AT hartungdagmar standardizedreportingofprostatemricomparisonoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsversion1andversion2
AT schickvolker standardizedreportingofprostatemricomparisonoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsversion1andversion2
AT petersinga standardizedreportingofprostatemricomparisonoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsversion1andversion2
AT schedlpeter standardizedreportingofprostatemricomparisonoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsversion1andversion2
AT pertschystefanie standardizedreportingofprostatemricomparisonoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsversion1andversion2
AT wackerfrank standardizedreportingofprostatemricomparisonoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsversion1andversion2
AT voshagegotz standardizedreportingofprostatemricomparisonoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsversion1andversion2
AT hueperkatja standardizedreportingofprostatemricomparisonoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsversion1andversion2