Cargando…
Patenting nature or protecting culture? Ethnopharmacology and indigenous intellectual property rights
Ethnopharmacologists are scientists and anthropologists that study indigenous medicines and healing practices, and who often develop new therapies and medicines for wider use. Ethnopharmacologists do fieldwork with indigenous peoples in traditional societies, where they encounter a wide range of cul...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5033432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsw003 |
_version_ | 1782455143749386240 |
---|---|
author | McGonigle, Ian Vincent |
author_facet | McGonigle, Ian Vincent |
author_sort | McGonigle, Ian Vincent |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ethnopharmacologists are scientists and anthropologists that study indigenous medicines and healing practices, and who often develop new therapies and medicines for wider use. Ethnopharmacologists do fieldwork with indigenous peoples in traditional societies, where they encounter a wide range of cultural values and varying ideas about the nature of property relations. This poses difficulties for protecting indigenous intellectual property and for making just trade agreements. This Note reviews the legal issues relevant to the protection of indigenous resources in ethnopharmacology trade agreements, and suggests that recent developments in anthropology and the social study of science could be instructive in furthering the legal discourse and in providing policy directions. Specifically, the Note introduces the concepts of ‘ontological pluralism’ and ‘epistemic subsidiarity’, which could help lawmakers write sui generis trade agreements to better protect indigenous knowledge and resources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5033432 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50334322016-10-21 Patenting nature or protecting culture? Ethnopharmacology and indigenous intellectual property rights McGonigle, Ian Vincent J Law Biosci New Developments Ethnopharmacologists are scientists and anthropologists that study indigenous medicines and healing practices, and who often develop new therapies and medicines for wider use. Ethnopharmacologists do fieldwork with indigenous peoples in traditional societies, where they encounter a wide range of cultural values and varying ideas about the nature of property relations. This poses difficulties for protecting indigenous intellectual property and for making just trade agreements. This Note reviews the legal issues relevant to the protection of indigenous resources in ethnopharmacology trade agreements, and suggests that recent developments in anthropology and the social study of science could be instructive in furthering the legal discourse and in providing policy directions. Specifically, the Note introduces the concepts of ‘ontological pluralism’ and ‘epistemic subsidiarity’, which could help lawmakers write sui generis trade agreements to better protect indigenous knowledge and resources. Oxford University Press 2016-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5033432/ /pubmed/27774245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsw003 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Duke University School of Law, Harvard Law School, Oxford University Press, and Stanford Law School. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | New Developments McGonigle, Ian Vincent Patenting nature or protecting culture? Ethnopharmacology and indigenous intellectual property rights |
title | Patenting nature or protecting culture? Ethnopharmacology and indigenous intellectual property rights |
title_full | Patenting nature or protecting culture? Ethnopharmacology and indigenous intellectual property rights |
title_fullStr | Patenting nature or protecting culture? Ethnopharmacology and indigenous intellectual property rights |
title_full_unstemmed | Patenting nature or protecting culture? Ethnopharmacology and indigenous intellectual property rights |
title_short | Patenting nature or protecting culture? Ethnopharmacology and indigenous intellectual property rights |
title_sort | patenting nature or protecting culture? ethnopharmacology and indigenous intellectual property rights |
topic | New Developments |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5033432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsw003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcgonigleianvincent patentingnatureorprotectingcultureethnopharmacologyandindigenousintellectualpropertyrights |