Cargando…
Neuroscience cannot answer these questions: a response to G. and R. Murrow's essay hypothesizing a link between dehumanization, human rights abuses and public policy
The Murrows' paper, ‘A hypothetical link between dehumanization and human rights abuses’, in which they propose that neuroscience may answer some difficult public policy questions, including questions about the First Amendment, is an unfortunate foray into law and public policy unjustified by t...
Autor principal: | Hoffman, Morris B. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5033444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsv041 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Dehumanization: its operations and its origins
por: Simpson, Robert Mark
Publicado: (2015) -
Considering advances in neuroscience through the lenses of law and human rights
por: Frankel, Mark S.
Publicado: (2014) -
A hypothetical neurological association between dehumanization and human rights abuses
por: Murrow, Gail B., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Law and neuroscience: recommendations submitted to the President's Bioethics Commission
por: Jones, Owen D., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Ethical considerations of neuroscience research and the application of neuroscience research findings for the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
Publicado: (2014)