Cargando…

Group Dynamics in Automatic Imitation

Imitation–matching the configural body movements of another individual–plays a crucial part in social interaction. We investigated whether automatic imitation is not only influenced by who we imitate (ingroup vs. outgroup member) but also by the nature of an expected interaction situation (competiti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gleibs, Ilka H., Wilson, Neil, Reddy, Geetha, Catmur, Caroline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5033460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27657926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162880
_version_ 1782455149942276096
author Gleibs, Ilka H.
Wilson, Neil
Reddy, Geetha
Catmur, Caroline
author_facet Gleibs, Ilka H.
Wilson, Neil
Reddy, Geetha
Catmur, Caroline
author_sort Gleibs, Ilka H.
collection PubMed
description Imitation–matching the configural body movements of another individual–plays a crucial part in social interaction. We investigated whether automatic imitation is not only influenced by who we imitate (ingroup vs. outgroup member) but also by the nature of an expected interaction situation (competitive vs. cooperative). In line with assumptions from Social Identity Theory), we predicted that both social group membership and the expected situation impact on the level of automatic imitation. We adopted a 2 (group membership target: ingroup, outgroup) x 2 (situation: cooperative, competitive) design. The dependent variable was the degree to which participants imitated the target in a reaction time automatic imitation task. 99 female students from two British Universities participated. We found a significant two-way interaction on the imitation effect. When interacting in expectation of cooperation, imitation was stronger for an ingroup target compared to an outgroup target. However, this was not the case in the competitive condition where imitation did not differ between ingroup and outgroup target. This demonstrates that the goal structure of an expected interaction will determine the extent to which intergroup relations influence imitation, supporting a social identity approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5033460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50334602016-10-10 Group Dynamics in Automatic Imitation Gleibs, Ilka H. Wilson, Neil Reddy, Geetha Catmur, Caroline PLoS One Research Article Imitation–matching the configural body movements of another individual–plays a crucial part in social interaction. We investigated whether automatic imitation is not only influenced by who we imitate (ingroup vs. outgroup member) but also by the nature of an expected interaction situation (competitive vs. cooperative). In line with assumptions from Social Identity Theory), we predicted that both social group membership and the expected situation impact on the level of automatic imitation. We adopted a 2 (group membership target: ingroup, outgroup) x 2 (situation: cooperative, competitive) design. The dependent variable was the degree to which participants imitated the target in a reaction time automatic imitation task. 99 female students from two British Universities participated. We found a significant two-way interaction on the imitation effect. When interacting in expectation of cooperation, imitation was stronger for an ingroup target compared to an outgroup target. However, this was not the case in the competitive condition where imitation did not differ between ingroup and outgroup target. This demonstrates that the goal structure of an expected interaction will determine the extent to which intergroup relations influence imitation, supporting a social identity approach. Public Library of Science 2016-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5033460/ /pubmed/27657926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162880 Text en © 2016 Gleibs et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gleibs, Ilka H.
Wilson, Neil
Reddy, Geetha
Catmur, Caroline
Group Dynamics in Automatic Imitation
title Group Dynamics in Automatic Imitation
title_full Group Dynamics in Automatic Imitation
title_fullStr Group Dynamics in Automatic Imitation
title_full_unstemmed Group Dynamics in Automatic Imitation
title_short Group Dynamics in Automatic Imitation
title_sort group dynamics in automatic imitation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5033460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27657926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162880
work_keys_str_mv AT gleibsilkah groupdynamicsinautomaticimitation
AT wilsonneil groupdynamicsinautomaticimitation
AT reddygeetha groupdynamicsinautomaticimitation
AT catmurcaroline groupdynamicsinautomaticimitation