Cargando…
Group Dynamics in Automatic Imitation
Imitation–matching the configural body movements of another individual–plays a crucial part in social interaction. We investigated whether automatic imitation is not only influenced by who we imitate (ingroup vs. outgroup member) but also by the nature of an expected interaction situation (competiti...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5033460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27657926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162880 |
_version_ | 1782455149942276096 |
---|---|
author | Gleibs, Ilka H. Wilson, Neil Reddy, Geetha Catmur, Caroline |
author_facet | Gleibs, Ilka H. Wilson, Neil Reddy, Geetha Catmur, Caroline |
author_sort | Gleibs, Ilka H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Imitation–matching the configural body movements of another individual–plays a crucial part in social interaction. We investigated whether automatic imitation is not only influenced by who we imitate (ingroup vs. outgroup member) but also by the nature of an expected interaction situation (competitive vs. cooperative). In line with assumptions from Social Identity Theory), we predicted that both social group membership and the expected situation impact on the level of automatic imitation. We adopted a 2 (group membership target: ingroup, outgroup) x 2 (situation: cooperative, competitive) design. The dependent variable was the degree to which participants imitated the target in a reaction time automatic imitation task. 99 female students from two British Universities participated. We found a significant two-way interaction on the imitation effect. When interacting in expectation of cooperation, imitation was stronger for an ingroup target compared to an outgroup target. However, this was not the case in the competitive condition where imitation did not differ between ingroup and outgroup target. This demonstrates that the goal structure of an expected interaction will determine the extent to which intergroup relations influence imitation, supporting a social identity approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5033460 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50334602016-10-10 Group Dynamics in Automatic Imitation Gleibs, Ilka H. Wilson, Neil Reddy, Geetha Catmur, Caroline PLoS One Research Article Imitation–matching the configural body movements of another individual–plays a crucial part in social interaction. We investigated whether automatic imitation is not only influenced by who we imitate (ingroup vs. outgroup member) but also by the nature of an expected interaction situation (competitive vs. cooperative). In line with assumptions from Social Identity Theory), we predicted that both social group membership and the expected situation impact on the level of automatic imitation. We adopted a 2 (group membership target: ingroup, outgroup) x 2 (situation: cooperative, competitive) design. The dependent variable was the degree to which participants imitated the target in a reaction time automatic imitation task. 99 female students from two British Universities participated. We found a significant two-way interaction on the imitation effect. When interacting in expectation of cooperation, imitation was stronger for an ingroup target compared to an outgroup target. However, this was not the case in the competitive condition where imitation did not differ between ingroup and outgroup target. This demonstrates that the goal structure of an expected interaction will determine the extent to which intergroup relations influence imitation, supporting a social identity approach. Public Library of Science 2016-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5033460/ /pubmed/27657926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162880 Text en © 2016 Gleibs et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gleibs, Ilka H. Wilson, Neil Reddy, Geetha Catmur, Caroline Group Dynamics in Automatic Imitation |
title | Group Dynamics in Automatic Imitation |
title_full | Group Dynamics in Automatic Imitation |
title_fullStr | Group Dynamics in Automatic Imitation |
title_full_unstemmed | Group Dynamics in Automatic Imitation |
title_short | Group Dynamics in Automatic Imitation |
title_sort | group dynamics in automatic imitation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5033460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27657926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162880 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gleibsilkah groupdynamicsinautomaticimitation AT wilsonneil groupdynamicsinautomaticimitation AT reddygeetha groupdynamicsinautomaticimitation AT catmurcaroline groupdynamicsinautomaticimitation |