Cargando…
Towards an ethics safe harbor for global biomedical research
Although increasingly global, data-driven genomics and other ‘omics’-focused research hold great promise for health discoveries, current research ethics review systems around the world challenge potential improvements in human health from such research. To overcome this challenge, we propose a ‘Safe...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5033519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lst002 |
_version_ | 1782455160870535168 |
---|---|
author | Dove, Edward S. Knoppers, Bartha M. Zawati, Ma'n H. |
author_facet | Dove, Edward S. Knoppers, Bartha M. Zawati, Ma'n H. |
author_sort | Dove, Edward S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although increasingly global, data-driven genomics and other ‘omics’-focused research hold great promise for health discoveries, current research ethics review systems around the world challenge potential improvements in human health from such research. To overcome this challenge, we propose a ‘Safe Harbor Framework for International Ethics Equivalency’ that facilitates the harmonization of ethics review of specific types of data-driven international research projects while respecting globally transposable research ethics norms and principles. The Safe Harbor would consist in part of an agency supporting an International Federation for Ethics Review (IFER), formed by a voluntary compact among countries, granting agencies, philanthropies, institutions, and healthcare, patient advocacy, and research organizations. IFER would be both a central ethics review body, and also a forum for review and follow-up of policies concerning ethics norms for international research projects. It would be built on five principle elements: (1) registration, (2) compliance review, (3) recognition, (4) monitoring and enforcement, and (5) public participation. The Safe Harbor would create many benefits for researchers, countries, and the general public, and may eventually have application beyond (gen)omics to other areas of biomedical research that increasingly engage in secondary use of data and present only negligible risks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5033519 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50335192016-10-21 Towards an ethics safe harbor for global biomedical research Dove, Edward S. Knoppers, Bartha M. Zawati, Ma'n H. J Law Biosci Original Article Although increasingly global, data-driven genomics and other ‘omics’-focused research hold great promise for health discoveries, current research ethics review systems around the world challenge potential improvements in human health from such research. To overcome this challenge, we propose a ‘Safe Harbor Framework for International Ethics Equivalency’ that facilitates the harmonization of ethics review of specific types of data-driven international research projects while respecting globally transposable research ethics norms and principles. The Safe Harbor would consist in part of an agency supporting an International Federation for Ethics Review (IFER), formed by a voluntary compact among countries, granting agencies, philanthropies, institutions, and healthcare, patient advocacy, and research organizations. IFER would be both a central ethics review body, and also a forum for review and follow-up of policies concerning ethics norms for international research projects. It would be built on five principle elements: (1) registration, (2) compliance review, (3) recognition, (4) monitoring and enforcement, and (5) public participation. The Safe Harbor would create many benefits for researchers, countries, and the general public, and may eventually have application beyond (gen)omics to other areas of biomedical research that increasingly engage in secondary use of data and present only negligible risks. Oxford University Press 2014-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5033519/ /pubmed/27774154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lst002 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Duke University School of Law, Harvard Law School, Oxford University Press, and Stanford Law School. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dove, Edward S. Knoppers, Bartha M. Zawati, Ma'n H. Towards an ethics safe harbor for global biomedical research |
title | Towards an ethics safe harbor for global biomedical research |
title_full | Towards an ethics safe harbor for global biomedical research |
title_fullStr | Towards an ethics safe harbor for global biomedical research |
title_full_unstemmed | Towards an ethics safe harbor for global biomedical research |
title_short | Towards an ethics safe harbor for global biomedical research |
title_sort | towards an ethics safe harbor for global biomedical research |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5033519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lst002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT doveedwards towardsanethicssafeharborforglobalbiomedicalresearch AT knoppersbartham towardsanethicssafeharborforglobalbiomedicalresearch AT zawatimanh towardsanethicssafeharborforglobalbiomedicalresearch |