Cargando…

Medical regulation of cognitive enhancement devices: some concerns

The authors present a cogent and detailed case for altering the Medical Devices Directive to allow regulation of cognitive enhancement devices (CEDs). Protection against significant risk of harm, especially for the vulnerable, and promotion of benefit through informed use of CEDs are all good featur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	King, Mike, Gavaghan, Colin, McMillan, John
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:	Peer Commentary
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5033531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsu020

Ejemplares similares

Outstanding questions concerning the regulation of cognitive enhancement devices
por: De Ridder, Dirk, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Regulation of cognitive enhancement devices: commentary
por: Johnson, Reuben, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The brain, cognitive enhancement devices, and European regulation
por: Kuersten, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Buttressing regulation of cognitive enhancement devices with principles of harm reduction
por: Fitz, Nicholas S., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Some questions about brain-based mind reading in forensic psychiatry
por: Glannon, Walter
Publicado: (2017)

FDA's pathway for regulation of FMT: not so fraught
por: Riley, Margaret F., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Precision medicine: a matter of regulation or collaboration?
por: Knoppers, Bartha Maria
Publicado: (2016)

‘Good soldiers are made, not born’(⊥): the dangers of medicalizing ability in the military use of genetics
por: Roberts, Jessica L.
Publicado: (2015)

Two kinds of rule regulating human subjects research
por: Sachs, Benjamin
Publicado: (2015)

A problem not yet manifest: gaps in insurance coverage of medical interventions after genetic testing
por: Malanga, Sarah, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Modernizing biomedical regulation: foresight and values in the promotion of responsible research and innovation
por: Harmon, Shawn H.E.
Publicado: (2016)

Regulating drug promotion to promote the public health: a response to Bennett et al.
por: Zettler, Patricia J.
Publicado: (2015)

The mouse that trolled
por: Hardy, John
Publicado: (2015)

It depends whose data are being shared: considerations for genomic data sharing policies
por: Robinson, Jill O., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Environmental neuroethics: changing the environment—changing the brain Recommendations submitted to the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
por: Illes, Judy, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Law and neuroscience: recommendations submitted to the President's Bioethics Commission
por: Jones, Owen D., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Letter
Publicado: (2014)

Ethical considerations of neuroscience research and the application of neuroscience research findings for the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
Publicado: (2014)

Considering advances in neuroscience through the lenses of law and human rights
por: Frankel, Mark S.
Publicado: (2014)

Yesterday's war; tomorrow's technology: peer commentary on ‘Ethical, legal, social and policy issues in the use of genomic technologies by the US military’
por: Evans, Nicholas G., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Military genomic testing: proportionality, expected benefits, and the connection between genotypes and phenotypes
por: Pence, Charles H.
Publicado: (2014)

Science wars—How much risk should soldiers be exposed to in military experimentation?
por: Savulescu, Julian
Publicado: (2015)

Dehumanization: its operations and its origins
por: Simpson, Robert Mark
Publicado: (2015)

Orphan drug incentives in the pharmacogenomic context: policy responses in the USA and Canada
por: Herder, Matthew
Publicado: (2016)

Hate speech, volition, and neurology
por: Roginsky, Alexandra B., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Neuroscience cannot answer these questions: a response to G. and R. Murrow's essay hypothesizing a link between dehumanization, human rights abuses and public policy
por: Hoffman, Morris B.
Publicado: (2015)

Egg freezing, stratified reproduction and the logic of not
por: Ikemoto, Lisa C.
Publicado: (2015)

The most plausible pro-coercion view: requiring informed agreement while penalizing non-participation in research
por: Barnhill, Anne
Publicado: (2015)

Informed consent to participation in interventional studies: second-order in a different sense
por: Eyal, Nir
Publicado: (2015)

Are ethics promulgations self-defeating?
por: Gray, Derrick
Publicado: (2015)

Diversion effects, incentive effects, and the goals of research ethics promulgations
por: Wenner, Danielle M.
Publicado: (2015)

Commentary: Is there a problem Consent in Escrow can solve?
por: Taylor, Holly A.
Publicado: (2015)

The problems of liminal states, line drawing, and false dichotomies
por: Suter, Sonia
Publicado: (2015)

The patent law Duchy of Grand Fenwick: a comment on The mouse that trolled: the long and tortuous history of a gene mutation patent that became an expensive impediment to Alzheimer's research
por: Sarnoff, Joshua D.
Publicado: (2015)

Off-label drug promotion and the ephemeral line between marketing and education
por: Krause, Joan H.
Publicado: (2015)

Universities and Patent Demands
por: Cordova, Andrew K., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

What do experimental simulations tell us about the effect of neuro/genetic evidence on jurors?
por: Scurich, Nicholas
Publicado: (2018)

Comment on mitochondrial replacement techniques and the birth of the ‘first’
por: Dimond, Rebecca, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Shifting the focus in the legal analysis of the first MST case
por: González-Santos, Sandra P
Publicado: (2017)

Bite mark evidence: bite mark analysis is not the same as bite mark comparison or matching or identification
por: Souviron, Richard, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_p6eccn6c18vuoficm8t1rj4nh2