Cargando…
Incidental findings and future testing methodologies: potential application of the ACMG 2013 recommendations
Reactions to the first clinical recommendations for the return of incidental findings (IFs) from genomic sequencing published by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) were polarized and resolute. Exploring the three main points of controversy: mandatory testing, testing childr...
Autor principal: | Richardson, Anastasia |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5033537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsu028 |
Ejemplares similares
-
MAGI-ACMG: Algorithm for the Classification of Variants According to ACMG and ACGS Recommendations
por: Cristofoli, Francesca, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Return of non-ACMG recommended incidental genetic findings to pediatric patients: considerations and opportunities from experiences in genomic sequencing
por: Bowling, Kevin M., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Genetic citizenship: DNA testing and the Israeli Law of Return
por: McGonigle, Ian V., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
The FDA and genetic testing: improper tools for a difficult problem
por: Willmarth, Kirk
Publicado: (2015) -
Designing a standard of proof: the case for professional standards in next-generation sequencing laboratory-developed tests
por: Walker, Quinn
Publicado: (2017)