Cargando…
Modulation of frontal effective connectivity during speech
Noninvasive neurostimulation methods such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can elicit long-lasting, polarity-dependent changes in neocortical excitability. In a previous concurrent tDCS-fMRI study of overt picture naming, we reported significant behavioural and regionally specific n...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academic Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5033642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26825443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.037 |
_version_ | 1782455181051428864 |
---|---|
author | Holland, Rachel Leff, Alex P. Penny, William D. Rothwell, John C. Crinion, Jenny |
author_facet | Holland, Rachel Leff, Alex P. Penny, William D. Rothwell, John C. Crinion, Jenny |
author_sort | Holland, Rachel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Noninvasive neurostimulation methods such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can elicit long-lasting, polarity-dependent changes in neocortical excitability. In a previous concurrent tDCS-fMRI study of overt picture naming, we reported significant behavioural and regionally specific neural facilitation effects in left inferior frontal cortex (IFC) with anodal tDCS applied to left frontal cortex (Holland et al., 2011). Although distributed connectivity effects of anodal tDCS have been modelled at rest, the mechanism by which ‘on-line’ tDCS may modulate neuronal connectivity during a task-state remains unclear. Here, we used Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) to determine: (i) how neural connectivity within the frontal speech network is modulated during anodal tDCS; and, (ii) how individual variability in behavioural response to anodal tDCS relates to changes in effective connectivity strength. Results showed that compared to sham, anodal tDCS elicited stronger feedback from inferior frontal sulcus (IFS) to ventral premotor (VPM) accompanied by weaker self-connections within VPM, consistent with processes of neuronal adaptation. During anodal tDCS individual variability in the feedforward connection strength from IFS to VPM positively correlated with the degree of facilitation in naming behaviour. These results provide an essential step towards understanding the mechanism of ‘online’ tDCS paired with a cognitive task. They also identify left IFS as a ‘top-down’ hub and driver for speech change. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5033642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Academic Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50336422016-10-15 Modulation of frontal effective connectivity during speech Holland, Rachel Leff, Alex P. Penny, William D. Rothwell, John C. Crinion, Jenny Neuroimage Article Noninvasive neurostimulation methods such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can elicit long-lasting, polarity-dependent changes in neocortical excitability. In a previous concurrent tDCS-fMRI study of overt picture naming, we reported significant behavioural and regionally specific neural facilitation effects in left inferior frontal cortex (IFC) with anodal tDCS applied to left frontal cortex (Holland et al., 2011). Although distributed connectivity effects of anodal tDCS have been modelled at rest, the mechanism by which ‘on-line’ tDCS may modulate neuronal connectivity during a task-state remains unclear. Here, we used Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) to determine: (i) how neural connectivity within the frontal speech network is modulated during anodal tDCS; and, (ii) how individual variability in behavioural response to anodal tDCS relates to changes in effective connectivity strength. Results showed that compared to sham, anodal tDCS elicited stronger feedback from inferior frontal sulcus (IFS) to ventral premotor (VPM) accompanied by weaker self-connections within VPM, consistent with processes of neuronal adaptation. During anodal tDCS individual variability in the feedforward connection strength from IFS to VPM positively correlated with the degree of facilitation in naming behaviour. These results provide an essential step towards understanding the mechanism of ‘online’ tDCS paired with a cognitive task. They also identify left IFS as a ‘top-down’ hub and driver for speech change. Academic Press 2016-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5033642/ /pubmed/26825443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.037 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Holland, Rachel Leff, Alex P. Penny, William D. Rothwell, John C. Crinion, Jenny Modulation of frontal effective connectivity during speech |
title | Modulation of frontal effective connectivity during speech |
title_full | Modulation of frontal effective connectivity during speech |
title_fullStr | Modulation of frontal effective connectivity during speech |
title_full_unstemmed | Modulation of frontal effective connectivity during speech |
title_short | Modulation of frontal effective connectivity during speech |
title_sort | modulation of frontal effective connectivity during speech |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5033642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26825443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.037 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hollandrachel modulationoffrontaleffectiveconnectivityduringspeech AT leffalexp modulationoffrontaleffectiveconnectivityduringspeech AT pennywilliamd modulationoffrontaleffectiveconnectivityduringspeech AT rothwelljohnc modulationoffrontaleffectiveconnectivityduringspeech AT crinionjenny modulationoffrontaleffectiveconnectivityduringspeech |