Cargando…

Modulation of frontal effective connectivity during speech

Noninvasive neurostimulation methods such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can elicit long-lasting, polarity-dependent changes in neocortical excitability. In a previous concurrent tDCS-fMRI study of overt picture naming, we reported significant behavioural and regionally specific n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holland, Rachel, Leff, Alex P., Penny, William D., Rothwell, John C., Crinion, Jenny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5033642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26825443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.037
_version_ 1782455181051428864
author Holland, Rachel
Leff, Alex P.
Penny, William D.
Rothwell, John C.
Crinion, Jenny
author_facet Holland, Rachel
Leff, Alex P.
Penny, William D.
Rothwell, John C.
Crinion, Jenny
author_sort Holland, Rachel
collection PubMed
description Noninvasive neurostimulation methods such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can elicit long-lasting, polarity-dependent changes in neocortical excitability. In a previous concurrent tDCS-fMRI study of overt picture naming, we reported significant behavioural and regionally specific neural facilitation effects in left inferior frontal cortex (IFC) with anodal tDCS applied to left frontal cortex (Holland et al., 2011). Although distributed connectivity effects of anodal tDCS have been modelled at rest, the mechanism by which ‘on-line’ tDCS may modulate neuronal connectivity during a task-state remains unclear. Here, we used Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) to determine: (i) how neural connectivity within the frontal speech network is modulated during anodal tDCS; and, (ii) how individual variability in behavioural response to anodal tDCS relates to changes in effective connectivity strength. Results showed that compared to sham, anodal tDCS elicited stronger feedback from inferior frontal sulcus (IFS) to ventral premotor (VPM) accompanied by weaker self-connections within VPM, consistent with processes of neuronal adaptation. During anodal tDCS individual variability in the feedforward connection strength from IFS to VPM positively correlated with the degree of facilitation in naming behaviour. These results provide an essential step towards understanding the mechanism of ‘online’ tDCS paired with a cognitive task. They also identify left IFS as a ‘top-down’ hub and driver for speech change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5033642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50336422016-10-15 Modulation of frontal effective connectivity during speech Holland, Rachel Leff, Alex P. Penny, William D. Rothwell, John C. Crinion, Jenny Neuroimage Article Noninvasive neurostimulation methods such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can elicit long-lasting, polarity-dependent changes in neocortical excitability. In a previous concurrent tDCS-fMRI study of overt picture naming, we reported significant behavioural and regionally specific neural facilitation effects in left inferior frontal cortex (IFC) with anodal tDCS applied to left frontal cortex (Holland et al., 2011). Although distributed connectivity effects of anodal tDCS have been modelled at rest, the mechanism by which ‘on-line’ tDCS may modulate neuronal connectivity during a task-state remains unclear. Here, we used Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) to determine: (i) how neural connectivity within the frontal speech network is modulated during anodal tDCS; and, (ii) how individual variability in behavioural response to anodal tDCS relates to changes in effective connectivity strength. Results showed that compared to sham, anodal tDCS elicited stronger feedback from inferior frontal sulcus (IFS) to ventral premotor (VPM) accompanied by weaker self-connections within VPM, consistent with processes of neuronal adaptation. During anodal tDCS individual variability in the feedforward connection strength from IFS to VPM positively correlated with the degree of facilitation in naming behaviour. These results provide an essential step towards understanding the mechanism of ‘online’ tDCS paired with a cognitive task. They also identify left IFS as a ‘top-down’ hub and driver for speech change. Academic Press 2016-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5033642/ /pubmed/26825443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.037 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Holland, Rachel
Leff, Alex P.
Penny, William D.
Rothwell, John C.
Crinion, Jenny
Modulation of frontal effective connectivity during speech
title Modulation of frontal effective connectivity during speech
title_full Modulation of frontal effective connectivity during speech
title_fullStr Modulation of frontal effective connectivity during speech
title_full_unstemmed Modulation of frontal effective connectivity during speech
title_short Modulation of frontal effective connectivity during speech
title_sort modulation of frontal effective connectivity during speech
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5033642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26825443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.037
work_keys_str_mv AT hollandrachel modulationoffrontaleffectiveconnectivityduringspeech
AT leffalexp modulationoffrontaleffectiveconnectivityduringspeech
AT pennywilliamd modulationoffrontaleffectiveconnectivityduringspeech
AT rothwelljohnc modulationoffrontaleffectiveconnectivityduringspeech
AT crinionjenny modulationoffrontaleffectiveconnectivityduringspeech