Cargando…
Behavioural and neural modulation of win-stay but not lose-shift strategies as a function of outcome value in Rock, Paper, Scissors
Competitive environments in which individuals compete for mutually-exclusive outcomes require rational decision making in order to maximize gains but often result in poor quality heuristics. Reasons for the greater reliance on lose-shift relative to win-stay behaviour shown in previous studies were...
Autores principales: | Forder, Lewis, Dyson, Benjamin James |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27658703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep33809 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Retention period differentially attenuates win–shift/lose–stay relative to win–stay/lose–shift performance in the rat
por: Reed, Phil
Publicado: (2017) -
Multi-AI competing and winning against humans in iterated Rock-Paper-Scissors game
por: Wang, Lei, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Negative outcomes evoke cyclic irrational decisions in Rock, Paper, Scissors
por: Dyson, Benjamin James, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Optimal Cooperation-Trap Strategies for the Iterated Rock-Paper-Scissors Game
por: Bi, Zedong, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Market Imitation and Win-Stay Lose-Shift Strategies Emerge as Unintended Patterns in Market Direction Guesses
por: Gutiérrez-Roig, Mario, et al.
Publicado: (2016)