Cargando…
Prediction of prostate cancer recurrence using quantitative phase imaging: Validation on a general population
Prediction of biochemical recurrence risk of prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy is critical for determining whether the patient would benefit from adjuvant treatments. Various nomograms exist today for identifying individuals at higher risk for recurrence; however, an optimistic under-e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27658807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep33818 |
_version_ | 1782455251648905216 |
---|---|
author | Sridharan, Shamira Macias, Virgilia Tangella, Krishnarao Melamed, Jonathan Dube, Emily Kong, Max Xiangtian Kajdacsy-Balla, André Popescu, Gabriel |
author_facet | Sridharan, Shamira Macias, Virgilia Tangella, Krishnarao Melamed, Jonathan Dube, Emily Kong, Max Xiangtian Kajdacsy-Balla, André Popescu, Gabriel |
author_sort | Sridharan, Shamira |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prediction of biochemical recurrence risk of prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy is critical for determining whether the patient would benefit from adjuvant treatments. Various nomograms exist today for identifying individuals at higher risk for recurrence; however, an optimistic under-estimation of recurrence risk is a common problem associated with these methods. We previously showed that anisotropy of light scattering measured using quantitative phase imaging, in the stromal layer adjacent to cancerous glands, is predictive of recurrence. That nested-case controlled study consisted of specimens specifically chosen such that the current prognostic methods fail. Here we report on validating the utility of optical anisotropy for prediction of prostate cancer recurrence in a general population of 192 patients, with 17% probability of recurrence. Our results show that our method can identify recurrent cases with 73% sensitivity and 72% specificity, which is comparable to that of CAPRA-S, a current state of the art method, in the same population. However, our results show that optical anisotropy outperforms CAPRA-S for patients with Gleason grades 7–10. In essence, we demonstrate that anisotropy is a better biomarker for identifying high-risk cases, while Gleason grade is better suited for selecting non-recurrence. Therefore, we propose that anisotropy and current techniques be used together to maximize prediction accuracy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5034339 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50343392016-09-29 Prediction of prostate cancer recurrence using quantitative phase imaging: Validation on a general population Sridharan, Shamira Macias, Virgilia Tangella, Krishnarao Melamed, Jonathan Dube, Emily Kong, Max Xiangtian Kajdacsy-Balla, André Popescu, Gabriel Sci Rep Article Prediction of biochemical recurrence risk of prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy is critical for determining whether the patient would benefit from adjuvant treatments. Various nomograms exist today for identifying individuals at higher risk for recurrence; however, an optimistic under-estimation of recurrence risk is a common problem associated with these methods. We previously showed that anisotropy of light scattering measured using quantitative phase imaging, in the stromal layer adjacent to cancerous glands, is predictive of recurrence. That nested-case controlled study consisted of specimens specifically chosen such that the current prognostic methods fail. Here we report on validating the utility of optical anisotropy for prediction of prostate cancer recurrence in a general population of 192 patients, with 17% probability of recurrence. Our results show that our method can identify recurrent cases with 73% sensitivity and 72% specificity, which is comparable to that of CAPRA-S, a current state of the art method, in the same population. However, our results show that optical anisotropy outperforms CAPRA-S for patients with Gleason grades 7–10. In essence, we demonstrate that anisotropy is a better biomarker for identifying high-risk cases, while Gleason grade is better suited for selecting non-recurrence. Therefore, we propose that anisotropy and current techniques be used together to maximize prediction accuracy. Nature Publishing Group 2016-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5034339/ /pubmed/27658807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep33818 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Sridharan, Shamira Macias, Virgilia Tangella, Krishnarao Melamed, Jonathan Dube, Emily Kong, Max Xiangtian Kajdacsy-Balla, André Popescu, Gabriel Prediction of prostate cancer recurrence using quantitative phase imaging: Validation on a general population |
title | Prediction of prostate cancer recurrence using quantitative phase imaging: Validation on a general population |
title_full | Prediction of prostate cancer recurrence using quantitative phase imaging: Validation on a general population |
title_fullStr | Prediction of prostate cancer recurrence using quantitative phase imaging: Validation on a general population |
title_full_unstemmed | Prediction of prostate cancer recurrence using quantitative phase imaging: Validation on a general population |
title_short | Prediction of prostate cancer recurrence using quantitative phase imaging: Validation on a general population |
title_sort | prediction of prostate cancer recurrence using quantitative phase imaging: validation on a general population |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27658807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep33818 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sridharanshamira predictionofprostatecancerrecurrenceusingquantitativephaseimagingvalidationonageneralpopulation AT maciasvirgilia predictionofprostatecancerrecurrenceusingquantitativephaseimagingvalidationonageneralpopulation AT tangellakrishnarao predictionofprostatecancerrecurrenceusingquantitativephaseimagingvalidationonageneralpopulation AT melamedjonathan predictionofprostatecancerrecurrenceusingquantitativephaseimagingvalidationonageneralpopulation AT dubeemily predictionofprostatecancerrecurrenceusingquantitativephaseimagingvalidationonageneralpopulation AT kongmaxxiangtian predictionofprostatecancerrecurrenceusingquantitativephaseimagingvalidationonageneralpopulation AT kajdacsyballaandre predictionofprostatecancerrecurrenceusingquantitativephaseimagingvalidationonageneralpopulation AT popescugabriel predictionofprostatecancerrecurrenceusingquantitativephaseimagingvalidationonageneralpopulation |