Cargando…

Commentary: Is there a problem Consent in Escrow can solve?

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Taylor, Holly A.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:	Peer Commentary
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsv022

Ejemplares similares

Consent in escrow: opting to opt in
por: Van der Loos, Kiah I., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Consent in escrow
por: Van der Loos, Kiah I., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Early analysis of deemed consent: why Moorlock’s critique is mistaken
por: Parsons, Jordan A
Publicado: (2021)

Premature presumptions about presumed consent: why Parsons’ comparison is mistaken
por: Moorlock, Greg
Publicado: (2021)

Informed consent to participation in interventional studies: second-order in a different sense
por: Eyal, Nir
Publicado: (2015)

Regulation of cognitive enhancement devices: commentary
por: Johnson, Reuben, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Peer commentary: in vitro gametogenesis: just another way to have a baby
por: Carbone, June
Publicado: (2016)

The problems of liminal states, line drawing, and false dichotomies
por: Suter, Sonia
Publicado: (2015)

Yesterday's war; tomorrow's technology: peer commentary on ‘Ethical, legal, social and policy issues in the use of genomic technologies by the US military’
por: Evans, Nicholas G., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

A problem not yet manifest: gaps in insurance coverage of medical interventions after genetic testing
por: Malanga, Sarah, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Can the COVID-19 interstate travel restrictions help lift the FDA’s blood ban?
por: Dorfman, Doron
Publicado: (2020)

Open peer review commentary on building clinically relevant outcomes across the Alzheimer's disease spectrum
por: Rockwood, Kenneth
Publicado: (2021)

Meaningful benefit and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in Alzheimer's disease: Open peer commentary
por: Cummings, Jeffrey
Publicado: (2023)

Can a microdynamic approach to sleep-onset imagery solve the overabundance problem of dreaming? Commentary on Tore Nielsen’s “Microdream neurophenomenology”
por: Windt, Jennifer M
Publicado: (2019)

Open peer commentary on “Prescribing anti‐amyloid immunotherapies to treat Alzheimer's disease: Fully informing patient decisions”
por: Gandy, Sam
Publicado: (2023)

Commentary on “Solving the benign prostatic hyperplasia puzzle”
por: Thomas, Dominique, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Law and neuroscience: recommendations submitted to the President's Bioethics Commission
por: Jones, Owen D., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Domains of Well-Being in Minimally Conscious Patients: Illuminating a Persistent Problem
por: Graham, Mackenzie
Publicado: (2018)

Precision medicine: a matter of regulation or collaboration?
por: Knoppers, Bartha Maria
Publicado: (2016)

Neuroscience cannot answer these questions: a response to G. and R. Murrow's essay hypothesizing a link between dehumanization, human rights abuses and public policy
por: Hoffman, Morris B.
Publicado: (2015)

Assessing health-state utility: is there a uniquely privileged perspective?
por: Wasserman, David
Publicado: (2020)

The patent law Duchy of Grand Fenwick: a comment on The mouse that trolled: the long and tortuous history of a gene mutation patent that became an expensive impediment to Alzheimer's research
por: Sarnoff, Joshua D.
Publicado: (2015)

Uterus transplantation: does procreative liberty encompass a right to gestate?
por: Alghrani, Amel
Publicado: (2016)

‘No, actually your life is going considerably worse’: a comment on Nir Eyal
por: Enoch, David
Publicado: (2020)

Regulating drug promotion to promote the public health: a response to Bennett et al.
por: Zettler, Patricia J.
Publicado: (2015)

We should not vaccinate the young to protect the old: a response to Giubilini, Savulescu, and Wilkinson
por: de Miguel Beriain, Iñigo
Publicado: (2021)

Commentary: Can the vessels help solve the puzzle? Distinguishing high myopes from primary open-angle glaucomas
por: Ramesh, Prasanna V, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Reporting, recording, and communication of COVID-19 cases in workplace: data protection as a moving target
por: Shabani, Mahsa, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Science wars—How much risk should soldiers be exposed to in military experimentation?
por: Savulescu, Julian
Publicado: (2015)

Dehumanization: its operations and its origins
por: Simpson, Robert Mark
Publicado: (2015)

Hate speech, volition, and neurology
por: Roginsky, Alexandra B., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Egg freezing, stratified reproduction and the logic of not
por: Ikemoto, Lisa C.
Publicado: (2015)

‘Good soldiers are made, not born’(⊥): the dangers of medicalizing ability in the military use of genetics
por: Roberts, Jessica L.
Publicado: (2015)

The most plausible pro-coercion view: requiring informed agreement while penalizing non-participation in research
por: Barnhill, Anne
Publicado: (2015)

Two kinds of rule regulating human subjects research
por: Sachs, Benjamin
Publicado: (2015)

Are ethics promulgations self-defeating?
por: Gray, Derrick
Publicado: (2015)

Diversion effects, incentive effects, and the goals of research ethics promulgations
por: Wenner, Danielle M.
Publicado: (2015)

Off-label drug promotion and the ephemeral line between marketing and education
por: Krause, Joan H.
Publicado: (2015)

The mouse that trolled
por: Hardy, John
Publicado: (2015)

FDA's pathway for regulation of FMT: not so fraught
por: Riley, Margaret F., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_9vn2vh4q04acck1f9bpacup57q