Cargando…
Universities and Patent Demands
Research universities have made enormous contributions to the field of medicine and the treatment of human disease. Alone or in collaboration with pharmaceutical companies, academic researchers have added to the store of knowledge that has led to numerous life science breakthroughs. A new chapter ma...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsv049 |
_version_ | 1782455261546414080 |
---|---|
author | Cordova, Andrew K. Feldman, Robin |
author_facet | Cordova, Andrew K. Feldman, Robin |
author_sort | Cordova, Andrew K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Research universities have made enormous contributions to the field of medicine and the treatment of human disease. Alone or in collaboration with pharmaceutical companies, academic researchers have added to the store of knowledge that has led to numerous life science breakthroughs. A new chapter may be opening for academic researchers, however, that could lead to a darker tale. ‘The mouse that trolled: the long and tortuous history of a gene mutation patent that became an expensive impediment to Alzheimer's research, by Bubela et al., chronicles one such tale.’ The authors do an excellent job of bringing to life the twisting saga that engulfed numerous academic and non-profit Alzheimer's researchers over many years. The authors note that the story is an outlier, but sadly, that may not be the case. There are increasing signs that academic researchers and their institutions are being caught up in the rush for gold that is accompanying the proliferation of the non-practicing entity business model. As I have noted before, academic institutions have a dual role, as keepers of the academic flame and guardians of the public monies entrusted to them through state and federal research funding. The specter of taxpayer money being used, not to advance research and for the betterment of society, but as part of schemes to extract money from productive companies may not sit well with voters, and ultimately, with legislators. In that case, researchers and institutions themselves may have much to lose. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5034403 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50344032016-10-21 Universities and Patent Demands Cordova, Andrew K. Feldman, Robin J Law Biosci Peer Commentary Research universities have made enormous contributions to the field of medicine and the treatment of human disease. Alone or in collaboration with pharmaceutical companies, academic researchers have added to the store of knowledge that has led to numerous life science breakthroughs. A new chapter may be opening for academic researchers, however, that could lead to a darker tale. ‘The mouse that trolled: the long and tortuous history of a gene mutation patent that became an expensive impediment to Alzheimer's research, by Bubela et al., chronicles one such tale.’ The authors do an excellent job of bringing to life the twisting saga that engulfed numerous academic and non-profit Alzheimer's researchers over many years. The authors note that the story is an outlier, but sadly, that may not be the case. There are increasing signs that academic researchers and their institutions are being caught up in the rush for gold that is accompanying the proliferation of the non-practicing entity business model. As I have noted before, academic institutions have a dual role, as keepers of the academic flame and guardians of the public monies entrusted to them through state and federal research funding. The specter of taxpayer money being used, not to advance research and for the betterment of society, but as part of schemes to extract money from productive companies may not sit well with voters, and ultimately, with legislators. In that case, researchers and institutions themselves may have much to lose. Oxford University Press 2015-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5034403/ /pubmed/27774221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsv049 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Duke University School of Law, Harvard Law School, Oxford University Press, and Stanford Law School. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Peer Commentary Cordova, Andrew K. Feldman, Robin Universities and Patent Demands |
title | Universities and Patent Demands |
title_full | Universities and Patent Demands |
title_fullStr | Universities and Patent Demands |
title_full_unstemmed | Universities and Patent Demands |
title_short | Universities and Patent Demands |
title_sort | universities and patent demands |
topic | Peer Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsv049 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cordovaandrewk universitiesandpatentdemands AT feldmanrobin universitiesandpatentdemands |