Cargando…

Universities and Patent Demands

Research universities have made enormous contributions to the field of medicine and the treatment of human disease. Alone or in collaboration with pharmaceutical companies, academic researchers have added to the store of knowledge that has led to numerous life science breakthroughs. A new chapter ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cordova, Andrew K., Feldman, Robin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsv049
_version_ 1782455261546414080
author Cordova, Andrew K.
Feldman, Robin
author_facet Cordova, Andrew K.
Feldman, Robin
author_sort Cordova, Andrew K.
collection PubMed
description Research universities have made enormous contributions to the field of medicine and the treatment of human disease. Alone or in collaboration with pharmaceutical companies, academic researchers have added to the store of knowledge that has led to numerous life science breakthroughs. A new chapter may be opening for academic researchers, however, that could lead to a darker tale. ‘The mouse that trolled: the long and tortuous history of a gene mutation patent that became an expensive impediment to Alzheimer's research, by Bubela et al., chronicles one such tale.’ The authors do an excellent job of bringing to life the twisting saga that engulfed numerous academic and non-profit Alzheimer's researchers over many years. The authors note that the story is an outlier, but sadly, that may not be the case. There are increasing signs that academic researchers and their institutions are being caught up in the rush for gold that is accompanying the proliferation of the non-practicing entity business model. As I have noted before, academic institutions have a dual role, as keepers of the academic flame and guardians of the public monies entrusted to them through state and federal research funding. The specter of taxpayer money being used, not to advance research and for the betterment of society, but as part of schemes to extract money from productive companies may not sit well with voters, and ultimately, with legislators. In that case, researchers and institutions themselves may have much to lose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5034403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50344032016-10-21 Universities and Patent Demands Cordova, Andrew K. Feldman, Robin J Law Biosci Peer Commentary Research universities have made enormous contributions to the field of medicine and the treatment of human disease. Alone or in collaboration with pharmaceutical companies, academic researchers have added to the store of knowledge that has led to numerous life science breakthroughs. A new chapter may be opening for academic researchers, however, that could lead to a darker tale. ‘The mouse that trolled: the long and tortuous history of a gene mutation patent that became an expensive impediment to Alzheimer's research, by Bubela et al., chronicles one such tale.’ The authors do an excellent job of bringing to life the twisting saga that engulfed numerous academic and non-profit Alzheimer's researchers over many years. The authors note that the story is an outlier, but sadly, that may not be the case. There are increasing signs that academic researchers and their institutions are being caught up in the rush for gold that is accompanying the proliferation of the non-practicing entity business model. As I have noted before, academic institutions have a dual role, as keepers of the academic flame and guardians of the public monies entrusted to them through state and federal research funding. The specter of taxpayer money being used, not to advance research and for the betterment of society, but as part of schemes to extract money from productive companies may not sit well with voters, and ultimately, with legislators. In that case, researchers and institutions themselves may have much to lose. Oxford University Press 2015-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5034403/ /pubmed/27774221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsv049 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Duke University School of Law, Harvard Law School, Oxford University Press, and Stanford Law School. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Peer Commentary
Cordova, Andrew K.
Feldman, Robin
Universities and Patent Demands
title Universities and Patent Demands
title_full Universities and Patent Demands
title_fullStr Universities and Patent Demands
title_full_unstemmed Universities and Patent Demands
title_short Universities and Patent Demands
title_sort universities and patent demands
topic Peer Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsv049
work_keys_str_mv AT cordovaandrewk universitiesandpatentdemands
AT feldmanrobin universitiesandpatentdemands