Cargando…

Therapeutic drug monitoring of mexiletine at a large academic medical center

INTRODUCTION: The therapeutic trough range for mexiletine (0.8–2 mcg/mL) was largely established in the setting of arrhythmia prophylaxis following myocardial infarction. OBJECTIVE: Describe the usage patterns of serum mexiletine concentrations and the impact of these concentrations on mexiletine do...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nei, Scott D, Danelich, Ilya M, Lose, Jennifer M, Leung, Lydia Yuk Ting, Asirvatham, Samuel J, McLeod, Christopher J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27708780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312116670659
_version_ 1782455274127228928
author Nei, Scott D
Danelich, Ilya M
Lose, Jennifer M
Leung, Lydia Yuk Ting
Asirvatham, Samuel J
McLeod, Christopher J
author_facet Nei, Scott D
Danelich, Ilya M
Lose, Jennifer M
Leung, Lydia Yuk Ting
Asirvatham, Samuel J
McLeod, Christopher J
author_sort Nei, Scott D
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The therapeutic trough range for mexiletine (0.8–2 mcg/mL) was largely established in the setting of arrhythmia prophylaxis following myocardial infarction. OBJECTIVE: Describe the usage patterns of serum mexiletine concentrations and the impact of these concentrations on mexiletine dosing in modern practice for ventricular arrhythmia treatment. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective analysis was conducted using the electronic medical record to identify serum mexiletine concentrations drawn between December 2004 and December 2014. The primary endpoint was the incidence of mexiletine concentrations drawn as troughs. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of mexiletine concentrations that prompted a dose change, association between adverse events and elevated concentrations, and association between baseline characteristics and mexiletine concentrations. RESULTS: A total of 237 individual concentrations were included for analysis with 109 (46.0%) drawn appropriately as trough concentrations. Only 31 (13.1%) of the 237 concentrations drawn prompted a dose change. Mexiletine was primarily used for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias (96.2%), and 108 (45.6%) concentrations were drawn in an effort to assess efficacy. The median concentration was statistically different between patients with and without an adverse event (0.8 vs 0.7 mcg/mL, respectively; p = 0.017), but may not represent a clinical significance. Patients with hepatic dysfunction had higher median concentrations compared to those without hepatic dysfunction (1.30 vs 1.07 mcg/mL; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Mexiletine concentrations are often drawn at inappropriate times and seldom influence a dose change. This study suggests that routine monitoring of mexiletine concentrations may not be necessary; however, therapeutic drug monitoring may be considered in patients with hepatic dysfunction or to confirm mexiletine absorption in patients where this represents a concern.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5034464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50344642016-10-05 Therapeutic drug monitoring of mexiletine at a large academic medical center Nei, Scott D Danelich, Ilya M Lose, Jennifer M Leung, Lydia Yuk Ting Asirvatham, Samuel J McLeod, Christopher J SAGE Open Med Original Article INTRODUCTION: The therapeutic trough range for mexiletine (0.8–2 mcg/mL) was largely established in the setting of arrhythmia prophylaxis following myocardial infarction. OBJECTIVE: Describe the usage patterns of serum mexiletine concentrations and the impact of these concentrations on mexiletine dosing in modern practice for ventricular arrhythmia treatment. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective analysis was conducted using the electronic medical record to identify serum mexiletine concentrations drawn between December 2004 and December 2014. The primary endpoint was the incidence of mexiletine concentrations drawn as troughs. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of mexiletine concentrations that prompted a dose change, association between adverse events and elevated concentrations, and association between baseline characteristics and mexiletine concentrations. RESULTS: A total of 237 individual concentrations were included for analysis with 109 (46.0%) drawn appropriately as trough concentrations. Only 31 (13.1%) of the 237 concentrations drawn prompted a dose change. Mexiletine was primarily used for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias (96.2%), and 108 (45.6%) concentrations were drawn in an effort to assess efficacy. The median concentration was statistically different between patients with and without an adverse event (0.8 vs 0.7 mcg/mL, respectively; p = 0.017), but may not represent a clinical significance. Patients with hepatic dysfunction had higher median concentrations compared to those without hepatic dysfunction (1.30 vs 1.07 mcg/mL; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Mexiletine concentrations are often drawn at inappropriate times and seldom influence a dose change. This study suggests that routine monitoring of mexiletine concentrations may not be necessary; however, therapeutic drug monitoring may be considered in patients with hepatic dysfunction or to confirm mexiletine absorption in patients where this represents a concern. SAGE Publications 2016-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5034464/ /pubmed/27708780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312116670659 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Nei, Scott D
Danelich, Ilya M
Lose, Jennifer M
Leung, Lydia Yuk Ting
Asirvatham, Samuel J
McLeod, Christopher J
Therapeutic drug monitoring of mexiletine at a large academic medical center
title Therapeutic drug monitoring of mexiletine at a large academic medical center
title_full Therapeutic drug monitoring of mexiletine at a large academic medical center
title_fullStr Therapeutic drug monitoring of mexiletine at a large academic medical center
title_full_unstemmed Therapeutic drug monitoring of mexiletine at a large academic medical center
title_short Therapeutic drug monitoring of mexiletine at a large academic medical center
title_sort therapeutic drug monitoring of mexiletine at a large academic medical center
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27708780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312116670659
work_keys_str_mv AT neiscottd therapeuticdrugmonitoringofmexiletineatalargeacademicmedicalcenter
AT danelichilyam therapeuticdrugmonitoringofmexiletineatalargeacademicmedicalcenter
AT losejenniferm therapeuticdrugmonitoringofmexiletineatalargeacademicmedicalcenter
AT leunglydiayukting therapeuticdrugmonitoringofmexiletineatalargeacademicmedicalcenter
AT asirvathamsamuelj therapeuticdrugmonitoringofmexiletineatalargeacademicmedicalcenter
AT mcleodchristopherj therapeuticdrugmonitoringofmexiletineatalargeacademicmedicalcenter