Cargando…

Feasibility and validity of a statistical adjustment to reduce self-report bias of height and weight in wave 1 of the Add Health study

BACKGROUND: Bias in adolescent self-reported height and weight is well documented. Given the importance and widespread use of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health) data for obesity research, we developed and tested the feasibility and validity of an empirically d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liechty, Janet M., Bi, Xuan, Qu, Annie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27658820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0227-y
_version_ 1782455286712238080
author Liechty, Janet M.
Bi, Xuan
Qu, Annie
author_facet Liechty, Janet M.
Bi, Xuan
Qu, Annie
author_sort Liechty, Janet M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bias in adolescent self-reported height and weight is well documented. Given the importance and widespread use of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health) data for obesity research, we developed and tested the feasibility and validity of an empirically derived statistical correction for self-report bias in wave 1 (W1) of Add Health, a large panel study in the United States. METHODS: Participants in grades 7–12 with complete height and weight data at W1 were included (n = 20,175). We used measured and self-reported (SR) height and weight and relevant biopsychosocial factors from wave 2 (W2) of Add Health (n = 14,190) to identify sources of bias and derive the most efficient sex-specific estimates of corrected height and weight. Measured, SR, and corrected W2 BMI values were calculated and compared, including sensitivity and specificity. Final correction equations were applied to W1. RESULTS: After correction, weight status misclassification rates among those who underestimated their weight status were reduced from 6.6 to 5.7 % for males and from 8.0 to 5.6 % for females compared to self-report; and the correlation between SR and measured BMI in W2 increased slightly from 0.92 to 0.93. Among females, correction procedures resulted in a 3.4 % increase in sensitivity to detect overweight/obesity (BMI ≥ 25) and 5.9 % increase in sensitivity for obesity (BMI ≥ 30). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that application of the proposed statistical corrections can reduce bias of self-report height and weight in W1 of the Add Health data and may be useful in some analyses. In particular, the corrected BMI values improve sensitivity --the ability to detect a true positive—for overweight/obesity among females, which addresses a major concern about self-report bias in obesity research. However, the correction does not improve sensitivity to identify underweight or healthy weight adolescents and so should be applied selectively based on research questions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5034522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50345222016-09-29 Feasibility and validity of a statistical adjustment to reduce self-report bias of height and weight in wave 1 of the Add Health study Liechty, Janet M. Bi, Xuan Qu, Annie BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Bias in adolescent self-reported height and weight is well documented. Given the importance and widespread use of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health) data for obesity research, we developed and tested the feasibility and validity of an empirically derived statistical correction for self-report bias in wave 1 (W1) of Add Health, a large panel study in the United States. METHODS: Participants in grades 7–12 with complete height and weight data at W1 were included (n = 20,175). We used measured and self-reported (SR) height and weight and relevant biopsychosocial factors from wave 2 (W2) of Add Health (n = 14,190) to identify sources of bias and derive the most efficient sex-specific estimates of corrected height and weight. Measured, SR, and corrected W2 BMI values were calculated and compared, including sensitivity and specificity. Final correction equations were applied to W1. RESULTS: After correction, weight status misclassification rates among those who underestimated their weight status were reduced from 6.6 to 5.7 % for males and from 8.0 to 5.6 % for females compared to self-report; and the correlation between SR and measured BMI in W2 increased slightly from 0.92 to 0.93. Among females, correction procedures resulted in a 3.4 % increase in sensitivity to detect overweight/obesity (BMI ≥ 25) and 5.9 % increase in sensitivity for obesity (BMI ≥ 30). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that application of the proposed statistical corrections can reduce bias of self-report height and weight in W1 of the Add Health data and may be useful in some analyses. In particular, the corrected BMI values improve sensitivity --the ability to detect a true positive—for overweight/obesity among females, which addresses a major concern about self-report bias in obesity research. However, the correction does not improve sensitivity to identify underweight or healthy weight adolescents and so should be applied selectively based on research questions. BioMed Central 2016-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5034522/ /pubmed/27658820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0227-y Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liechty, Janet M.
Bi, Xuan
Qu, Annie
Feasibility and validity of a statistical adjustment to reduce self-report bias of height and weight in wave 1 of the Add Health study
title Feasibility and validity of a statistical adjustment to reduce self-report bias of height and weight in wave 1 of the Add Health study
title_full Feasibility and validity of a statistical adjustment to reduce self-report bias of height and weight in wave 1 of the Add Health study
title_fullStr Feasibility and validity of a statistical adjustment to reduce self-report bias of height and weight in wave 1 of the Add Health study
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and validity of a statistical adjustment to reduce self-report bias of height and weight in wave 1 of the Add Health study
title_short Feasibility and validity of a statistical adjustment to reduce self-report bias of height and weight in wave 1 of the Add Health study
title_sort feasibility and validity of a statistical adjustment to reduce self-report bias of height and weight in wave 1 of the add health study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27658820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0227-y
work_keys_str_mv AT liechtyjanetm feasibilityandvalidityofastatisticaladjustmenttoreduceselfreportbiasofheightandweightinwave1oftheaddhealthstudy
AT bixuan feasibilityandvalidityofastatisticaladjustmenttoreduceselfreportbiasofheightandweightinwave1oftheaddhealthstudy
AT quannie feasibilityandvalidityofastatisticaladjustmenttoreduceselfreportbiasofheightandweightinwave1oftheaddhealthstudy