Cargando…
A comparative ethnobotany of Khevsureti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Tusheti, Svaneti, and Racha-Lechkhumi, Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo), Caucasus
BACKGROUND: The Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo in Georgian language) is part of the Caucasus biodiversity hotspot, and human agricultural plant use dates bat at least 6000 years. However, little ethnobiological research has been published from the region since the 1940s. Given the lack of recent re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27659258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-016-0110-2 |
_version_ | 1782455298655518720 |
---|---|
author | Bussmann, Rainer W. Paniagua Zambrana, Narel Y. Sikharulidze, Shalva Kikvidze, Zaal Kikodze, David Tchelidze, David Khutsishvili, Manana Batsatsashvili, Ketevan Hart, Robbie E. |
author_facet | Bussmann, Rainer W. Paniagua Zambrana, Narel Y. Sikharulidze, Shalva Kikvidze, Zaal Kikodze, David Tchelidze, David Khutsishvili, Manana Batsatsashvili, Ketevan Hart, Robbie E. |
author_sort | Bussmann, Rainer W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo in Georgian language) is part of the Caucasus biodiversity hotspot, and human agricultural plant use dates bat at least 6000 years. However, little ethnobiological research has been published from the region since the 1940s. Given the lack of recent research in the region, the present study we report on plant uses in Skartvelo (Republic of Georgia), Caucasus. We hypothesized that, (1) given the long tradition of plant use, and the isolation under Soviet rule, plant use both based on homegardens and wild harvesting would be more pronounced in Georgia than in the wiser region, (2) the Soviet occupation would have had broad influence on plant use, and (3) there would still be incidence of knowledge loss despite wide plant use. METHODS: Fieldwork was conducted in Khevsureti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Tusheti, Svaneti, and Racha in July–August 2013, July–August 2014, and September–October 2015. Interviews using semi-structured questionnaires were conducted with 170 participants (80 women and 90 men) after obtaining their oral prior informed consent. All interviews were carried out in the participants’ homes and gardens by native speakers of Georgian and its local dialects (Svan, Tush, Khevsur, Psav), or, where participants spoke these as their native language, Armenian, Russian, or Greek. RESULTS: In the present study we encountered 480 plant species belonging to 249 genera of 95 families being used in the research region. The highest number of species and of unique species were reported from the remote Tusheti-Khevsureti region. Informant consensus and number of use reports were highest for each region in the food and medicinal use categories. Of the 480 plants being used in the research region 282 species were exclusively wild-harvested, 103 were grown in homegardens, and 84 were both grown in gardens and sourced in the wild. CONCLUSIONS: Plant species, and uses, found in our study, both for Georgia in general, as well as for its regions, showed clear relations to the wider Caucasus - Asia Minor - Balkans cultural complex. However, plant use in Georgia was much more diverse than reported in other studies from Eurasia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13002-016-0110-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5034577 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50345772016-09-29 A comparative ethnobotany of Khevsureti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Tusheti, Svaneti, and Racha-Lechkhumi, Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo), Caucasus Bussmann, Rainer W. Paniagua Zambrana, Narel Y. Sikharulidze, Shalva Kikvidze, Zaal Kikodze, David Tchelidze, David Khutsishvili, Manana Batsatsashvili, Ketevan Hart, Robbie E. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed Research BACKGROUND: The Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo in Georgian language) is part of the Caucasus biodiversity hotspot, and human agricultural plant use dates bat at least 6000 years. However, little ethnobiological research has been published from the region since the 1940s. Given the lack of recent research in the region, the present study we report on plant uses in Skartvelo (Republic of Georgia), Caucasus. We hypothesized that, (1) given the long tradition of plant use, and the isolation under Soviet rule, plant use both based on homegardens and wild harvesting would be more pronounced in Georgia than in the wiser region, (2) the Soviet occupation would have had broad influence on plant use, and (3) there would still be incidence of knowledge loss despite wide plant use. METHODS: Fieldwork was conducted in Khevsureti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Tusheti, Svaneti, and Racha in July–August 2013, July–August 2014, and September–October 2015. Interviews using semi-structured questionnaires were conducted with 170 participants (80 women and 90 men) after obtaining their oral prior informed consent. All interviews were carried out in the participants’ homes and gardens by native speakers of Georgian and its local dialects (Svan, Tush, Khevsur, Psav), or, where participants spoke these as their native language, Armenian, Russian, or Greek. RESULTS: In the present study we encountered 480 plant species belonging to 249 genera of 95 families being used in the research region. The highest number of species and of unique species were reported from the remote Tusheti-Khevsureti region. Informant consensus and number of use reports were highest for each region in the food and medicinal use categories. Of the 480 plants being used in the research region 282 species were exclusively wild-harvested, 103 were grown in homegardens, and 84 were both grown in gardens and sourced in the wild. CONCLUSIONS: Plant species, and uses, found in our study, both for Georgia in general, as well as for its regions, showed clear relations to the wider Caucasus - Asia Minor - Balkans cultural complex. However, plant use in Georgia was much more diverse than reported in other studies from Eurasia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13002-016-0110-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5034577/ /pubmed/27659258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-016-0110-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Bussmann, Rainer W. Paniagua Zambrana, Narel Y. Sikharulidze, Shalva Kikvidze, Zaal Kikodze, David Tchelidze, David Khutsishvili, Manana Batsatsashvili, Ketevan Hart, Robbie E. A comparative ethnobotany of Khevsureti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Tusheti, Svaneti, and Racha-Lechkhumi, Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo), Caucasus |
title | A comparative ethnobotany of Khevsureti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Tusheti, Svaneti, and Racha-Lechkhumi, Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo), Caucasus |
title_full | A comparative ethnobotany of Khevsureti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Tusheti, Svaneti, and Racha-Lechkhumi, Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo), Caucasus |
title_fullStr | A comparative ethnobotany of Khevsureti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Tusheti, Svaneti, and Racha-Lechkhumi, Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo), Caucasus |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative ethnobotany of Khevsureti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Tusheti, Svaneti, and Racha-Lechkhumi, Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo), Caucasus |
title_short | A comparative ethnobotany of Khevsureti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Tusheti, Svaneti, and Racha-Lechkhumi, Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo), Caucasus |
title_sort | comparative ethnobotany of khevsureti, samtskhe-javakheti, tusheti, svaneti, and racha-lechkhumi, republic of georgia (sakartvelo), caucasus |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27659258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-016-0110-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bussmannrainerw acomparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus AT paniaguazambrananarely acomparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus AT sikharulidzeshalva acomparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus AT kikvidzezaal acomparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus AT kikodzedavid acomparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus AT tchelidzedavid acomparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus AT khutsishvilimanana acomparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus AT batsatsashviliketevan acomparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus AT hartrobbiee acomparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus AT bussmannrainerw comparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus AT paniaguazambrananarely comparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus AT sikharulidzeshalva comparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus AT kikvidzezaal comparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus AT kikodzedavid comparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus AT tchelidzedavid comparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus AT khutsishvilimanana comparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus AT batsatsashviliketevan comparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus AT hartrobbiee comparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus |