Cargando…

A comparative ethnobotany of Khevsureti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Tusheti, Svaneti, and Racha-Lechkhumi, Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo), Caucasus

BACKGROUND: The Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo in Georgian language) is part of the Caucasus biodiversity hotspot, and human agricultural plant use dates bat at least 6000 years. However, little ethnobiological research has been published from the region since the 1940s. Given the lack of recent re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bussmann, Rainer W., Paniagua Zambrana, Narel Y., Sikharulidze, Shalva, Kikvidze, Zaal, Kikodze, David, Tchelidze, David, Khutsishvili, Manana, Batsatsashvili, Ketevan, Hart, Robbie E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27659258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-016-0110-2
_version_ 1782455298655518720
author Bussmann, Rainer W.
Paniagua Zambrana, Narel Y.
Sikharulidze, Shalva
Kikvidze, Zaal
Kikodze, David
Tchelidze, David
Khutsishvili, Manana
Batsatsashvili, Ketevan
Hart, Robbie E.
author_facet Bussmann, Rainer W.
Paniagua Zambrana, Narel Y.
Sikharulidze, Shalva
Kikvidze, Zaal
Kikodze, David
Tchelidze, David
Khutsishvili, Manana
Batsatsashvili, Ketevan
Hart, Robbie E.
author_sort Bussmann, Rainer W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo in Georgian language) is part of the Caucasus biodiversity hotspot, and human agricultural plant use dates bat at least 6000 years. However, little ethnobiological research has been published from the region since the 1940s. Given the lack of recent research in the region, the present study we report on plant uses in Skartvelo (Republic of Georgia), Caucasus. We hypothesized that, (1) given the long tradition of plant use, and the isolation under Soviet rule, plant use both based on homegardens and wild harvesting would be more pronounced in Georgia than in the wiser region, (2) the Soviet occupation would have had broad influence on plant use, and (3) there would still be incidence of knowledge loss despite wide plant use. METHODS: Fieldwork was conducted in Khevsureti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Tusheti, Svaneti, and Racha in July–August 2013, July–August 2014, and September–October 2015. Interviews using semi-structured questionnaires were conducted with 170 participants (80 women and 90 men) after obtaining their oral prior informed consent. All interviews were carried out in the participants’ homes and gardens by native speakers of Georgian and its local dialects (Svan, Tush, Khevsur, Psav), or, where participants spoke these as their native language, Armenian, Russian, or Greek. RESULTS: In the present study we encountered 480 plant species belonging to 249 genera of 95 families being used in the research region. The highest number of species and of unique species were reported from the remote Tusheti-Khevsureti region. Informant consensus and number of use reports were highest for each region in the food and medicinal use categories. Of the 480 plants being used in the research region 282 species were exclusively wild-harvested, 103 were grown in homegardens, and 84 were both grown in gardens and sourced in the wild. CONCLUSIONS: Plant species, and uses, found in our study, both for Georgia in general, as well as for its regions, showed clear relations to the wider Caucasus - Asia Minor - Balkans cultural complex. However, plant use in Georgia was much more diverse than reported in other studies from Eurasia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13002-016-0110-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5034577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50345772016-09-29 A comparative ethnobotany of Khevsureti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Tusheti, Svaneti, and Racha-Lechkhumi, Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo), Caucasus Bussmann, Rainer W. Paniagua Zambrana, Narel Y. Sikharulidze, Shalva Kikvidze, Zaal Kikodze, David Tchelidze, David Khutsishvili, Manana Batsatsashvili, Ketevan Hart, Robbie E. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed Research BACKGROUND: The Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo in Georgian language) is part of the Caucasus biodiversity hotspot, and human agricultural plant use dates bat at least 6000 years. However, little ethnobiological research has been published from the region since the 1940s. Given the lack of recent research in the region, the present study we report on plant uses in Skartvelo (Republic of Georgia), Caucasus. We hypothesized that, (1) given the long tradition of plant use, and the isolation under Soviet rule, plant use both based on homegardens and wild harvesting would be more pronounced in Georgia than in the wiser region, (2) the Soviet occupation would have had broad influence on plant use, and (3) there would still be incidence of knowledge loss despite wide plant use. METHODS: Fieldwork was conducted in Khevsureti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Tusheti, Svaneti, and Racha in July–August 2013, July–August 2014, and September–October 2015. Interviews using semi-structured questionnaires were conducted with 170 participants (80 women and 90 men) after obtaining their oral prior informed consent. All interviews were carried out in the participants’ homes and gardens by native speakers of Georgian and its local dialects (Svan, Tush, Khevsur, Psav), or, where participants spoke these as their native language, Armenian, Russian, or Greek. RESULTS: In the present study we encountered 480 plant species belonging to 249 genera of 95 families being used in the research region. The highest number of species and of unique species were reported from the remote Tusheti-Khevsureti region. Informant consensus and number of use reports were highest for each region in the food and medicinal use categories. Of the 480 plants being used in the research region 282 species were exclusively wild-harvested, 103 were grown in homegardens, and 84 were both grown in gardens and sourced in the wild. CONCLUSIONS: Plant species, and uses, found in our study, both for Georgia in general, as well as for its regions, showed clear relations to the wider Caucasus - Asia Minor - Balkans cultural complex. However, plant use in Georgia was much more diverse than reported in other studies from Eurasia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13002-016-0110-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5034577/ /pubmed/27659258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-016-0110-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Bussmann, Rainer W.
Paniagua Zambrana, Narel Y.
Sikharulidze, Shalva
Kikvidze, Zaal
Kikodze, David
Tchelidze, David
Khutsishvili, Manana
Batsatsashvili, Ketevan
Hart, Robbie E.
A comparative ethnobotany of Khevsureti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Tusheti, Svaneti, and Racha-Lechkhumi, Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo), Caucasus
title A comparative ethnobotany of Khevsureti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Tusheti, Svaneti, and Racha-Lechkhumi, Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo), Caucasus
title_full A comparative ethnobotany of Khevsureti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Tusheti, Svaneti, and Racha-Lechkhumi, Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo), Caucasus
title_fullStr A comparative ethnobotany of Khevsureti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Tusheti, Svaneti, and Racha-Lechkhumi, Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo), Caucasus
title_full_unstemmed A comparative ethnobotany of Khevsureti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Tusheti, Svaneti, and Racha-Lechkhumi, Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo), Caucasus
title_short A comparative ethnobotany of Khevsureti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Tusheti, Svaneti, and Racha-Lechkhumi, Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo), Caucasus
title_sort comparative ethnobotany of khevsureti, samtskhe-javakheti, tusheti, svaneti, and racha-lechkhumi, republic of georgia (sakartvelo), caucasus
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27659258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-016-0110-2
work_keys_str_mv AT bussmannrainerw acomparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus
AT paniaguazambrananarely acomparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus
AT sikharulidzeshalva acomparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus
AT kikvidzezaal acomparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus
AT kikodzedavid acomparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus
AT tchelidzedavid acomparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus
AT khutsishvilimanana acomparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus
AT batsatsashviliketevan acomparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus
AT hartrobbiee acomparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus
AT bussmannrainerw comparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus
AT paniaguazambrananarely comparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus
AT sikharulidzeshalva comparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus
AT kikvidzezaal comparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus
AT kikodzedavid comparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus
AT tchelidzedavid comparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus
AT khutsishvilimanana comparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus
AT batsatsashviliketevan comparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus
AT hartrobbiee comparativeethnobotanyofkhevsuretisamtskhejavakhetitushetisvanetiandrachalechkhumirepublicofgeorgiasakartvelocaucasus