Cargando…

Resilience of a FIT screening programme against screening fatigue: a modelling study

BACKGROUND: Repeated participation is important in faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) screening for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, a large number of screening invitations over time may lead to screening fatigue and consequently, decreased participation rates. We evaluated the impact of screening...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greuter, Marjolein J. E., Berkhof, Johannes, Canfell, Karen, Lew, Jie-Bin, Dekker, Evelien, Coupé, Veerle M. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27658454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3667-8
_version_ 1782455309893107712
author Greuter, Marjolein J. E.
Berkhof, Johannes
Canfell, Karen
Lew, Jie-Bin
Dekker, Evelien
Coupé, Veerle M. H.
author_facet Greuter, Marjolein J. E.
Berkhof, Johannes
Canfell, Karen
Lew, Jie-Bin
Dekker, Evelien
Coupé, Veerle M. H.
author_sort Greuter, Marjolein J. E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Repeated participation is important in faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) screening for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, a large number of screening invitations over time may lead to screening fatigue and consequently, decreased participation rates. We evaluated the impact of screening fatigue on overall screening programme effectiveness. METHODS: Using the ASCCA model, we simulated the Dutch CRC screening programme consisting of biennial FIT screening in individuals aged 55–75. We studied the resilience of the programme against heterogeneity in screening attendance and decrease in participation rate due to screening fatigue. Outcomes were reductions in CRC incidence and mortality compared to no screening. RESULTS: Assuming a homogenous 63 % participation, i.e., each round each individual was equally likely to attend screening, 30 years of screening reduced CRC incidence and mortality by 39 and 53 %, respectively, compared to no screening. When assuming clustered participation, i.e., three subgroups of individuals with a high (95 %), moderate (65 %) and low (5 %) participation rate, screening was less effective; reductions were 33 % for CRC incidence and 43 % for CRC mortality. Screening fatigue considerably reduced screening effectiveness; if individuals refrained from screening after three negative screens, model-predicted incidence reductions decreased to 25 and 18 % under homogenous and clustered participation, respectively. Figures were 34 and 25 % for mortality reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Screening will substantially decrease CRC incidence and mortality. However, screening effectiveness can be seriously compromised if screening fatigue occurs. This warrants careful monitoring of individual screening behaviour and consideration of targeted invitation systems in individuals who have (repeatedly) missed screening rounds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5034628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50346282016-09-29 Resilience of a FIT screening programme against screening fatigue: a modelling study Greuter, Marjolein J. E. Berkhof, Johannes Canfell, Karen Lew, Jie-Bin Dekker, Evelien Coupé, Veerle M. H. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Repeated participation is important in faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) screening for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, a large number of screening invitations over time may lead to screening fatigue and consequently, decreased participation rates. We evaluated the impact of screening fatigue on overall screening programme effectiveness. METHODS: Using the ASCCA model, we simulated the Dutch CRC screening programme consisting of biennial FIT screening in individuals aged 55–75. We studied the resilience of the programme against heterogeneity in screening attendance and decrease in participation rate due to screening fatigue. Outcomes were reductions in CRC incidence and mortality compared to no screening. RESULTS: Assuming a homogenous 63 % participation, i.e., each round each individual was equally likely to attend screening, 30 years of screening reduced CRC incidence and mortality by 39 and 53 %, respectively, compared to no screening. When assuming clustered participation, i.e., three subgroups of individuals with a high (95 %), moderate (65 %) and low (5 %) participation rate, screening was less effective; reductions were 33 % for CRC incidence and 43 % for CRC mortality. Screening fatigue considerably reduced screening effectiveness; if individuals refrained from screening after three negative screens, model-predicted incidence reductions decreased to 25 and 18 % under homogenous and clustered participation, respectively. Figures were 34 and 25 % for mortality reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Screening will substantially decrease CRC incidence and mortality. However, screening effectiveness can be seriously compromised if screening fatigue occurs. This warrants careful monitoring of individual screening behaviour and consideration of targeted invitation systems in individuals who have (repeatedly) missed screening rounds. BioMed Central 2016-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5034628/ /pubmed/27658454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3667-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Greuter, Marjolein J. E.
Berkhof, Johannes
Canfell, Karen
Lew, Jie-Bin
Dekker, Evelien
Coupé, Veerle M. H.
Resilience of a FIT screening programme against screening fatigue: a modelling study
title Resilience of a FIT screening programme against screening fatigue: a modelling study
title_full Resilience of a FIT screening programme against screening fatigue: a modelling study
title_fullStr Resilience of a FIT screening programme against screening fatigue: a modelling study
title_full_unstemmed Resilience of a FIT screening programme against screening fatigue: a modelling study
title_short Resilience of a FIT screening programme against screening fatigue: a modelling study
title_sort resilience of a fit screening programme against screening fatigue: a modelling study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27658454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3667-8
work_keys_str_mv AT greutermarjoleinje resilienceofafitscreeningprogrammeagainstscreeningfatigueamodellingstudy
AT berkhofjohannes resilienceofafitscreeningprogrammeagainstscreeningfatigueamodellingstudy
AT canfellkaren resilienceofafitscreeningprogrammeagainstscreeningfatigueamodellingstudy
AT lewjiebin resilienceofafitscreeningprogrammeagainstscreeningfatigueamodellingstudy
AT dekkerevelien resilienceofafitscreeningprogrammeagainstscreeningfatigueamodellingstudy
AT coupeveerlemh resilienceofafitscreeningprogrammeagainstscreeningfatigueamodellingstudy