Cargando…

Hemodynamic evaluation in patients with transposition of the great arteries after the arterial switch operation: 4D flow and 2D phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared with Doppler echocardiography

BACKGROUND: Peak velocity measurements are used to evaluate the significance of stenosis in patients with transposition of the great arteries after the arterial switch operation (TGA after ASO). 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) provides 3-directional velocity encoding and full volumet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jarvis, Kelly, Vonder, Marleen, Barker, Alex J., Schnell, Susanne, Rose, Michael, Carr, James, Robinson, Joshua D., Markl, Michael, Rigsby, Cynthia K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27659876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0276-8
_version_ 1782455314851823616
author Jarvis, Kelly
Vonder, Marleen
Barker, Alex J.
Schnell, Susanne
Rose, Michael
Carr, James
Robinson, Joshua D.
Markl, Michael
Rigsby, Cynthia K.
author_facet Jarvis, Kelly
Vonder, Marleen
Barker, Alex J.
Schnell, Susanne
Rose, Michael
Carr, James
Robinson, Joshua D.
Markl, Michael
Rigsby, Cynthia K.
author_sort Jarvis, Kelly
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Peak velocity measurements are used to evaluate the significance of stenosis in patients with transposition of the great arteries after the arterial switch operation (TGA after ASO). 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) provides 3-directional velocity encoding and full volumetric coverage of the great arteries and may thus improve the hemodynamic evaluation in these patients. The aim of this study was to compare peak velocities measured by 4D flow CMR with 2D phase contrast (PC) CMR and the gold standard Doppler echocardiography (echo) in patients with TGA after ASO. METHODS: Nineteen patients (mean age 13 ± 9 years, range 1–25 years) with TGA after ASO who underwent 2D PC CMR and 4D flow CMR were included in this study. Peak velocities were measured with 4D flow CMR in the aorta and pulmonary arteries and compared to peak velocities measured with 2D PC CMR and Doppler echo. 2D PC CMR data were available in the ascending aorta, main, right and left pulmonary arteries (AAO/MPA/RPA/LPA) for 19/18/17/17 scans, respectively, and Doppler echo data were available for 13/9/6/6 scans, respectively. Peak velocities were measured with: 1) a single cross section for 2D PC CMR, 2) velocity maximum intensity projections (MIPs) for 4D flow CMR and 3) Doppler echo. RESULTS: Significantly higher peak velocities were found with 4D flow CMR than 2D PC CMR in the AAO (p = 0.003), MPA (p = 0.002) and RPA (p = 0.005) but not in the LPA (p = 0.200). No difference in peak velocity was found between 4D flow CMR and Doppler echo (p > 0.46) or 2D PC CMR and echo (p > 0.11) for all analyzed vessel segments. CONCLUSIONS: 4D flow CMR evaluation of patients with TGA after ASO detected higher peak velocities than 2D PC CMR, indicating the potential of 4D flow CMR to provide improved stenosis assessment in these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5034650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50346502016-09-29 Hemodynamic evaluation in patients with transposition of the great arteries after the arterial switch operation: 4D flow and 2D phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared with Doppler echocardiography Jarvis, Kelly Vonder, Marleen Barker, Alex J. Schnell, Susanne Rose, Michael Carr, James Robinson, Joshua D. Markl, Michael Rigsby, Cynthia K. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Peak velocity measurements are used to evaluate the significance of stenosis in patients with transposition of the great arteries after the arterial switch operation (TGA after ASO). 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) provides 3-directional velocity encoding and full volumetric coverage of the great arteries and may thus improve the hemodynamic evaluation in these patients. The aim of this study was to compare peak velocities measured by 4D flow CMR with 2D phase contrast (PC) CMR and the gold standard Doppler echocardiography (echo) in patients with TGA after ASO. METHODS: Nineteen patients (mean age 13 ± 9 years, range 1–25 years) with TGA after ASO who underwent 2D PC CMR and 4D flow CMR were included in this study. Peak velocities were measured with 4D flow CMR in the aorta and pulmonary arteries and compared to peak velocities measured with 2D PC CMR and Doppler echo. 2D PC CMR data were available in the ascending aorta, main, right and left pulmonary arteries (AAO/MPA/RPA/LPA) for 19/18/17/17 scans, respectively, and Doppler echo data were available for 13/9/6/6 scans, respectively. Peak velocities were measured with: 1) a single cross section for 2D PC CMR, 2) velocity maximum intensity projections (MIPs) for 4D flow CMR and 3) Doppler echo. RESULTS: Significantly higher peak velocities were found with 4D flow CMR than 2D PC CMR in the AAO (p = 0.003), MPA (p = 0.002) and RPA (p = 0.005) but not in the LPA (p = 0.200). No difference in peak velocity was found between 4D flow CMR and Doppler echo (p > 0.46) or 2D PC CMR and echo (p > 0.11) for all analyzed vessel segments. CONCLUSIONS: 4D flow CMR evaluation of patients with TGA after ASO detected higher peak velocities than 2D PC CMR, indicating the potential of 4D flow CMR to provide improved stenosis assessment in these patients. BioMed Central 2016-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5034650/ /pubmed/27659876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0276-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Jarvis, Kelly
Vonder, Marleen
Barker, Alex J.
Schnell, Susanne
Rose, Michael
Carr, James
Robinson, Joshua D.
Markl, Michael
Rigsby, Cynthia K.
Hemodynamic evaluation in patients with transposition of the great arteries after the arterial switch operation: 4D flow and 2D phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared with Doppler echocardiography
title Hemodynamic evaluation in patients with transposition of the great arteries after the arterial switch operation: 4D flow and 2D phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared with Doppler echocardiography
title_full Hemodynamic evaluation in patients with transposition of the great arteries after the arterial switch operation: 4D flow and 2D phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared with Doppler echocardiography
title_fullStr Hemodynamic evaluation in patients with transposition of the great arteries after the arterial switch operation: 4D flow and 2D phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared with Doppler echocardiography
title_full_unstemmed Hemodynamic evaluation in patients with transposition of the great arteries after the arterial switch operation: 4D flow and 2D phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared with Doppler echocardiography
title_short Hemodynamic evaluation in patients with transposition of the great arteries after the arterial switch operation: 4D flow and 2D phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared with Doppler echocardiography
title_sort hemodynamic evaluation in patients with transposition of the great arteries after the arterial switch operation: 4d flow and 2d phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared with doppler echocardiography
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27659876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0276-8
work_keys_str_mv AT jarviskelly hemodynamicevaluationinpatientswithtranspositionofthegreatarteriesafterthearterialswitchoperation4dflowand2dphasecontrastcardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparedwithdopplerechocardiography
AT vondermarleen hemodynamicevaluationinpatientswithtranspositionofthegreatarteriesafterthearterialswitchoperation4dflowand2dphasecontrastcardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparedwithdopplerechocardiography
AT barkeralexj hemodynamicevaluationinpatientswithtranspositionofthegreatarteriesafterthearterialswitchoperation4dflowand2dphasecontrastcardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparedwithdopplerechocardiography
AT schnellsusanne hemodynamicevaluationinpatientswithtranspositionofthegreatarteriesafterthearterialswitchoperation4dflowand2dphasecontrastcardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparedwithdopplerechocardiography
AT rosemichael hemodynamicevaluationinpatientswithtranspositionofthegreatarteriesafterthearterialswitchoperation4dflowand2dphasecontrastcardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparedwithdopplerechocardiography
AT carrjames hemodynamicevaluationinpatientswithtranspositionofthegreatarteriesafterthearterialswitchoperation4dflowand2dphasecontrastcardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparedwithdopplerechocardiography
AT robinsonjoshuad hemodynamicevaluationinpatientswithtranspositionofthegreatarteriesafterthearterialswitchoperation4dflowand2dphasecontrastcardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparedwithdopplerechocardiography
AT marklmichael hemodynamicevaluationinpatientswithtranspositionofthegreatarteriesafterthearterialswitchoperation4dflowand2dphasecontrastcardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparedwithdopplerechocardiography
AT rigsbycynthiak hemodynamicevaluationinpatientswithtranspositionofthegreatarteriesafterthearterialswitchoperation4dflowand2dphasecontrastcardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparedwithdopplerechocardiography