Cargando…

How does biomass distribution change with size and differ among species? An analysis for 1200 plant species from five continents

We compiled a global database for leaf, stem and root biomass representing c. 11 000 records for c. 1200 herbaceous and woody species grown under either controlled or field conditions. We used this data set to analyse allometric relationships and fractional biomass distribution to leaves, stems and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poorter, Hendrik, Jagodzinski, Andrzej M., Ruiz‐Peinado, Ricardo, Kuyah, Shem, Luo, Yunjian, Oleksyn, Jacek, Usoltsev, Vladimir A., Buckley, Thomas N., Reich, Peter B., Sack, Lawren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26197869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.13571
_version_ 1782455328295616512
author Poorter, Hendrik
Jagodzinski, Andrzej M.
Ruiz‐Peinado, Ricardo
Kuyah, Shem
Luo, Yunjian
Oleksyn, Jacek
Usoltsev, Vladimir A.
Buckley, Thomas N.
Reich, Peter B.
Sack, Lawren
author_facet Poorter, Hendrik
Jagodzinski, Andrzej M.
Ruiz‐Peinado, Ricardo
Kuyah, Shem
Luo, Yunjian
Oleksyn, Jacek
Usoltsev, Vladimir A.
Buckley, Thomas N.
Reich, Peter B.
Sack, Lawren
author_sort Poorter, Hendrik
collection PubMed
description We compiled a global database for leaf, stem and root biomass representing c. 11 000 records for c. 1200 herbaceous and woody species grown under either controlled or field conditions. We used this data set to analyse allometric relationships and fractional biomass distribution to leaves, stems and roots. We tested whether allometric scaling exponents are generally constant across plant sizes as predicted by metabolic scaling theory, or whether instead they change dynamically with plant size. We also quantified interspecific variation in biomass distribution among plant families and functional groups. Across all species combined, leaf vs stem and leaf vs root scaling exponents decreased from c. 1.00 for small plants to c. 0.60 for the largest trees considered. Evergreens had substantially higher leaf mass fractions (LMFs) than deciduous species, whereas graminoids maintained higher root mass fractions (RMFs) than eudicotyledonous herbs. These patterns do not support the hypothesis of fixed allometric exponents. Rather, continuous shifts in allometric exponents with plant size during ontogeny and evolution are the norm. Across seed plants, variation in biomass distribution among species is related more to function than phylogeny. We propose that the higher LMF of evergreens at least partly compensates for their relatively low leaf area : leaf mass ratio.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5034769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50347692016-10-03 How does biomass distribution change with size and differ among species? An analysis for 1200 plant species from five continents Poorter, Hendrik Jagodzinski, Andrzej M. Ruiz‐Peinado, Ricardo Kuyah, Shem Luo, Yunjian Oleksyn, Jacek Usoltsev, Vladimir A. Buckley, Thomas N. Reich, Peter B. Sack, Lawren New Phytol Research We compiled a global database for leaf, stem and root biomass representing c. 11 000 records for c. 1200 herbaceous and woody species grown under either controlled or field conditions. We used this data set to analyse allometric relationships and fractional biomass distribution to leaves, stems and roots. We tested whether allometric scaling exponents are generally constant across plant sizes as predicted by metabolic scaling theory, or whether instead they change dynamically with plant size. We also quantified interspecific variation in biomass distribution among plant families and functional groups. Across all species combined, leaf vs stem and leaf vs root scaling exponents decreased from c. 1.00 for small plants to c. 0.60 for the largest trees considered. Evergreens had substantially higher leaf mass fractions (LMFs) than deciduous species, whereas graminoids maintained higher root mass fractions (RMFs) than eudicotyledonous herbs. These patterns do not support the hypothesis of fixed allometric exponents. Rather, continuous shifts in allometric exponents with plant size during ontogeny and evolution are the norm. Across seed plants, variation in biomass distribution among species is related more to function than phylogeny. We propose that the higher LMF of evergreens at least partly compensates for their relatively low leaf area : leaf mass ratio. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-11 2015-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5034769/ /pubmed/26197869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.13571 Text en © 2015 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2015 New Phytologist Trust This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Poorter, Hendrik
Jagodzinski, Andrzej M.
Ruiz‐Peinado, Ricardo
Kuyah, Shem
Luo, Yunjian
Oleksyn, Jacek
Usoltsev, Vladimir A.
Buckley, Thomas N.
Reich, Peter B.
Sack, Lawren
How does biomass distribution change with size and differ among species? An analysis for 1200 plant species from five continents
title How does biomass distribution change with size and differ among species? An analysis for 1200 plant species from five continents
title_full How does biomass distribution change with size and differ among species? An analysis for 1200 plant species from five continents
title_fullStr How does biomass distribution change with size and differ among species? An analysis for 1200 plant species from five continents
title_full_unstemmed How does biomass distribution change with size and differ among species? An analysis for 1200 plant species from five continents
title_short How does biomass distribution change with size and differ among species? An analysis for 1200 plant species from five continents
title_sort how does biomass distribution change with size and differ among species? an analysis for 1200 plant species from five continents
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26197869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.13571
work_keys_str_mv AT poorterhendrik howdoesbiomassdistributionchangewithsizeanddifferamongspeciesananalysisfor1200plantspeciesfromfivecontinents
AT jagodzinskiandrzejm howdoesbiomassdistributionchangewithsizeanddifferamongspeciesananalysisfor1200plantspeciesfromfivecontinents
AT ruizpeinadoricardo howdoesbiomassdistributionchangewithsizeanddifferamongspeciesananalysisfor1200plantspeciesfromfivecontinents
AT kuyahshem howdoesbiomassdistributionchangewithsizeanddifferamongspeciesananalysisfor1200plantspeciesfromfivecontinents
AT luoyunjian howdoesbiomassdistributionchangewithsizeanddifferamongspeciesananalysisfor1200plantspeciesfromfivecontinents
AT oleksynjacek howdoesbiomassdistributionchangewithsizeanddifferamongspeciesananalysisfor1200plantspeciesfromfivecontinents
AT usoltsevvladimira howdoesbiomassdistributionchangewithsizeanddifferamongspeciesananalysisfor1200plantspeciesfromfivecontinents
AT buckleythomasn howdoesbiomassdistributionchangewithsizeanddifferamongspeciesananalysisfor1200plantspeciesfromfivecontinents
AT reichpeterb howdoesbiomassdistributionchangewithsizeanddifferamongspeciesananalysisfor1200plantspeciesfromfivecontinents
AT sacklawren howdoesbiomassdistributionchangewithsizeanddifferamongspeciesananalysisfor1200plantspeciesfromfivecontinents