Cargando…

Clinical outcome of subchromosomal events detected by whole‐genome noninvasive prenatal testing

OBJECTIVE: A novel algorithm to identify fetal microdeletion events in maternal plasma has been developed and used in clinical laboratory‐based noninvasive prenatal testing. We used this approach to identify the subchromosomal events 5pdel, 22q11del, 15qdel, 1p36del, 4pdel, 11qdel, and 8qdel in rout...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Helgeson, J., Wardrop, J., Boomer, T., Almasri, E., Paxton, W. B., Saldivar, J. S., Dharajiya, N., Monroe, T. J., Farkas, D. H., Grosu, D. S., McCullough, R. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26088833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.4640
_version_ 1782455330606678016
author Helgeson, J.
Wardrop, J.
Boomer, T.
Almasri, E.
Paxton, W. B.
Saldivar, J. S.
Dharajiya, N.
Monroe, T. J.
Farkas, D. H.
Grosu, D. S.
McCullough, R. M.
author_facet Helgeson, J.
Wardrop, J.
Boomer, T.
Almasri, E.
Paxton, W. B.
Saldivar, J. S.
Dharajiya, N.
Monroe, T. J.
Farkas, D. H.
Grosu, D. S.
McCullough, R. M.
author_sort Helgeson, J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: A novel algorithm to identify fetal microdeletion events in maternal plasma has been developed and used in clinical laboratory‐based noninvasive prenatal testing. We used this approach to identify the subchromosomal events 5pdel, 22q11del, 15qdel, 1p36del, 4pdel, 11qdel, and 8qdel in routine testing. We describe the clinical outcomes of those samples identified with these subchromosomal events. METHODS: Blood samples from high‐risk pregnant women submitted for noninvasive prenatal testing were analyzed using low coverage whole genome massively parallel sequencing. Sequencing data were analyzed using a novel algorithm to detect trisomies and microdeletions. RESULTS: In testing 175 393 samples, 55 subchromosomal deletions were reported. The overall positive predictive value for each subchromosomal aberration ranged from 60% to 100% for cases with diagnostic and clinical follow‐up information. The total false positive rate was 0.0017% for confirmed false positives results; false negative rate and sensitivity were not conclusively determined. CONCLUSION: Noninvasive testing can be expanded into the detection of subchromosomal copy number variations, while maintaining overall high test specificity. In the current setting, our results demonstrate high positive predictive values for testing of rare subchromosomal deletions. © 2015 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5034801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50348012016-10-03 Clinical outcome of subchromosomal events detected by whole‐genome noninvasive prenatal testing Helgeson, J. Wardrop, J. Boomer, T. Almasri, E. Paxton, W. B. Saldivar, J. S. Dharajiya, N. Monroe, T. J. Farkas, D. H. Grosu, D. S. McCullough, R. M. Prenat Diagn Original Articles OBJECTIVE: A novel algorithm to identify fetal microdeletion events in maternal plasma has been developed and used in clinical laboratory‐based noninvasive prenatal testing. We used this approach to identify the subchromosomal events 5pdel, 22q11del, 15qdel, 1p36del, 4pdel, 11qdel, and 8qdel in routine testing. We describe the clinical outcomes of those samples identified with these subchromosomal events. METHODS: Blood samples from high‐risk pregnant women submitted for noninvasive prenatal testing were analyzed using low coverage whole genome massively parallel sequencing. Sequencing data were analyzed using a novel algorithm to detect trisomies and microdeletions. RESULTS: In testing 175 393 samples, 55 subchromosomal deletions were reported. The overall positive predictive value for each subchromosomal aberration ranged from 60% to 100% for cases with diagnostic and clinical follow‐up information. The total false positive rate was 0.0017% for confirmed false positives results; false negative rate and sensitivity were not conclusively determined. CONCLUSION: Noninvasive testing can be expanded into the detection of subchromosomal copy number variations, while maintaining overall high test specificity. In the current setting, our results demonstrate high positive predictive values for testing of rare subchromosomal deletions. © 2015 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-07-27 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5034801/ /pubmed/26088833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.4640 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Helgeson, J.
Wardrop, J.
Boomer, T.
Almasri, E.
Paxton, W. B.
Saldivar, J. S.
Dharajiya, N.
Monroe, T. J.
Farkas, D. H.
Grosu, D. S.
McCullough, R. M.
Clinical outcome of subchromosomal events detected by whole‐genome noninvasive prenatal testing
title Clinical outcome of subchromosomal events detected by whole‐genome noninvasive prenatal testing
title_full Clinical outcome of subchromosomal events detected by whole‐genome noninvasive prenatal testing
title_fullStr Clinical outcome of subchromosomal events detected by whole‐genome noninvasive prenatal testing
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcome of subchromosomal events detected by whole‐genome noninvasive prenatal testing
title_short Clinical outcome of subchromosomal events detected by whole‐genome noninvasive prenatal testing
title_sort clinical outcome of subchromosomal events detected by whole‐genome noninvasive prenatal testing
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26088833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.4640
work_keys_str_mv AT helgesonj clinicaloutcomeofsubchromosomaleventsdetectedbywholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltesting
AT wardropj clinicaloutcomeofsubchromosomaleventsdetectedbywholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltesting
AT boomert clinicaloutcomeofsubchromosomaleventsdetectedbywholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltesting
AT almasrie clinicaloutcomeofsubchromosomaleventsdetectedbywholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltesting
AT paxtonwb clinicaloutcomeofsubchromosomaleventsdetectedbywholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltesting
AT saldivarjs clinicaloutcomeofsubchromosomaleventsdetectedbywholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltesting
AT dharajiyan clinicaloutcomeofsubchromosomaleventsdetectedbywholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltesting
AT monroetj clinicaloutcomeofsubchromosomaleventsdetectedbywholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltesting
AT farkasdh clinicaloutcomeofsubchromosomaleventsdetectedbywholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltesting
AT grosuds clinicaloutcomeofsubchromosomaleventsdetectedbywholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltesting
AT mcculloughrm clinicaloutcomeofsubchromosomaleventsdetectedbywholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltesting