Cargando…
Clinical outcome of subchromosomal events detected by whole‐genome noninvasive prenatal testing
OBJECTIVE: A novel algorithm to identify fetal microdeletion events in maternal plasma has been developed and used in clinical laboratory‐based noninvasive prenatal testing. We used this approach to identify the subchromosomal events 5pdel, 22q11del, 15qdel, 1p36del, 4pdel, 11qdel, and 8qdel in rout...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26088833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.4640 |
_version_ | 1782455330606678016 |
---|---|
author | Helgeson, J. Wardrop, J. Boomer, T. Almasri, E. Paxton, W. B. Saldivar, J. S. Dharajiya, N. Monroe, T. J. Farkas, D. H. Grosu, D. S. McCullough, R. M. |
author_facet | Helgeson, J. Wardrop, J. Boomer, T. Almasri, E. Paxton, W. B. Saldivar, J. S. Dharajiya, N. Monroe, T. J. Farkas, D. H. Grosu, D. S. McCullough, R. M. |
author_sort | Helgeson, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: A novel algorithm to identify fetal microdeletion events in maternal plasma has been developed and used in clinical laboratory‐based noninvasive prenatal testing. We used this approach to identify the subchromosomal events 5pdel, 22q11del, 15qdel, 1p36del, 4pdel, 11qdel, and 8qdel in routine testing. We describe the clinical outcomes of those samples identified with these subchromosomal events. METHODS: Blood samples from high‐risk pregnant women submitted for noninvasive prenatal testing were analyzed using low coverage whole genome massively parallel sequencing. Sequencing data were analyzed using a novel algorithm to detect trisomies and microdeletions. RESULTS: In testing 175 393 samples, 55 subchromosomal deletions were reported. The overall positive predictive value for each subchromosomal aberration ranged from 60% to 100% for cases with diagnostic and clinical follow‐up information. The total false positive rate was 0.0017% for confirmed false positives results; false negative rate and sensitivity were not conclusively determined. CONCLUSION: Noninvasive testing can be expanded into the detection of subchromosomal copy number variations, while maintaining overall high test specificity. In the current setting, our results demonstrate high positive predictive values for testing of rare subchromosomal deletions. © 2015 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5034801 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50348012016-10-03 Clinical outcome of subchromosomal events detected by whole‐genome noninvasive prenatal testing Helgeson, J. Wardrop, J. Boomer, T. Almasri, E. Paxton, W. B. Saldivar, J. S. Dharajiya, N. Monroe, T. J. Farkas, D. H. Grosu, D. S. McCullough, R. M. Prenat Diagn Original Articles OBJECTIVE: A novel algorithm to identify fetal microdeletion events in maternal plasma has been developed and used in clinical laboratory‐based noninvasive prenatal testing. We used this approach to identify the subchromosomal events 5pdel, 22q11del, 15qdel, 1p36del, 4pdel, 11qdel, and 8qdel in routine testing. We describe the clinical outcomes of those samples identified with these subchromosomal events. METHODS: Blood samples from high‐risk pregnant women submitted for noninvasive prenatal testing were analyzed using low coverage whole genome massively parallel sequencing. Sequencing data were analyzed using a novel algorithm to detect trisomies and microdeletions. RESULTS: In testing 175 393 samples, 55 subchromosomal deletions were reported. The overall positive predictive value for each subchromosomal aberration ranged from 60% to 100% for cases with diagnostic and clinical follow‐up information. The total false positive rate was 0.0017% for confirmed false positives results; false negative rate and sensitivity were not conclusively determined. CONCLUSION: Noninvasive testing can be expanded into the detection of subchromosomal copy number variations, while maintaining overall high test specificity. In the current setting, our results demonstrate high positive predictive values for testing of rare subchromosomal deletions. © 2015 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-07-27 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5034801/ /pubmed/26088833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.4640 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Helgeson, J. Wardrop, J. Boomer, T. Almasri, E. Paxton, W. B. Saldivar, J. S. Dharajiya, N. Monroe, T. J. Farkas, D. H. Grosu, D. S. McCullough, R. M. Clinical outcome of subchromosomal events detected by whole‐genome noninvasive prenatal testing |
title | Clinical outcome of subchromosomal events detected by whole‐genome noninvasive prenatal testing |
title_full | Clinical outcome of subchromosomal events detected by whole‐genome noninvasive prenatal testing |
title_fullStr | Clinical outcome of subchromosomal events detected by whole‐genome noninvasive prenatal testing |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical outcome of subchromosomal events detected by whole‐genome noninvasive prenatal testing |
title_short | Clinical outcome of subchromosomal events detected by whole‐genome noninvasive prenatal testing |
title_sort | clinical outcome of subchromosomal events detected by whole‐genome noninvasive prenatal testing |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5034801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26088833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.4640 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT helgesonj clinicaloutcomeofsubchromosomaleventsdetectedbywholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltesting AT wardropj clinicaloutcomeofsubchromosomaleventsdetectedbywholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltesting AT boomert clinicaloutcomeofsubchromosomaleventsdetectedbywholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltesting AT almasrie clinicaloutcomeofsubchromosomaleventsdetectedbywholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltesting AT paxtonwb clinicaloutcomeofsubchromosomaleventsdetectedbywholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltesting AT saldivarjs clinicaloutcomeofsubchromosomaleventsdetectedbywholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltesting AT dharajiyan clinicaloutcomeofsubchromosomaleventsdetectedbywholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltesting AT monroetj clinicaloutcomeofsubchromosomaleventsdetectedbywholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltesting AT farkasdh clinicaloutcomeofsubchromosomaleventsdetectedbywholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltesting AT grosuds clinicaloutcomeofsubchromosomaleventsdetectedbywholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltesting AT mcculloughrm clinicaloutcomeofsubchromosomaleventsdetectedbywholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltesting |